儿童患者的尾部吗啡:接受脐下手术的儿童两种不同剂量的比较——一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-09 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_120_22
Sushree Das, Ranjita Acharya, Madhusmita Patro, Nupur Moda, Gunde Mounika
{"title":"儿童患者的尾部吗啡:接受脐下手术的儿童两种不同剂量的比较——一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。","authors":"Sushree Das,&nbsp;Ranjita Acharya,&nbsp;Madhusmita Patro,&nbsp;Nupur Moda,&nbsp;Gunde Mounika","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_120_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most feared symptoms of any disease is PAIN. It is a complex phenomenal experience, especially in children. Various methods and medications have been administered through different routes. Regional anesthesia produces marvelous postoperative analgesia and cessation of stress response in infants and children. Caudal epidural analgesia is the most acceptable and popular method of providing intra- and postoperative analgesia for abdominal, perineal, and lower limb surgeries in children. The use of preservative-free morphine as an adjunct to ropivacaine increases the quality and duration of analgesia despite the various side effects. Various articles use various doses of morphine as an adjuvant in caudal epidural analgesia. Hence, we conducted the study to compare the two dosages of morphine that is 20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> and 30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of caudal epidural morphine for infraumblical surgeries with regard to its efficacy and safety and side effect profiles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Sixty patients were divided into two groups. Group A: 20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of morphine was added to 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup> and the solution was made. Group B: 30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of morphine was added to 1 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup> of 0.2% ropivacaine. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, SPO<sub>2</sub>, pain score, and sedation score were recorded immediately, after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 18 h, and 24 h were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of analgesia is similar in both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.011). The mean duration was 20.517 ± 1.9143 h in Group A and 22.233 ± 1.6853 h in Group B. Children with the requirement of one dose of rescue analgesia in Group A was 83.3% which was higher than Group B being 66.7%. Children with no analgesic requirement were 16.7% in Group A and 33.3% in Group B. The incidence of side effects was more in Group B (8 [26.7%] children with nausea and vomiting; 1 [3.3%] children with urinary retention) than in Group A (2 [6.6%] children with nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the above observations, it can be concluded that morphine of less dosage (20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>) when added to 0.2% ropivacaine for the caudal epidural block has better efficacy than morphine of higher dosage (30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>) as the duration of analgesia is similar with decreased incidence of side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"360-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814005/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caudal Morphine in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Two Different Doses in Children Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery - A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sushree Das,&nbsp;Ranjita Acharya,&nbsp;Madhusmita Patro,&nbsp;Nupur Moda,&nbsp;Gunde Mounika\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_120_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the most feared symptoms of any disease is PAIN. It is a complex phenomenal experience, especially in children. Various methods and medications have been administered through different routes. Regional anesthesia produces marvelous postoperative analgesia and cessation of stress response in infants and children. Caudal epidural analgesia is the most acceptable and popular method of providing intra- and postoperative analgesia for abdominal, perineal, and lower limb surgeries in children. The use of preservative-free morphine as an adjunct to ropivacaine increases the quality and duration of analgesia despite the various side effects. Various articles use various doses of morphine as an adjuvant in caudal epidural analgesia. Hence, we conducted the study to compare the two dosages of morphine that is 20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> and 30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of caudal epidural morphine for infraumblical surgeries with regard to its efficacy and safety and side effect profiles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Sixty patients were divided into two groups. Group A: 20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of morphine was added to 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup> and the solution was made. Group B: 30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup> of morphine was added to 1 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup> of 0.2% ropivacaine. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, SPO<sub>2</sub>, pain score, and sedation score were recorded immediately, after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 18 h, and 24 h were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean duration of analgesia is similar in both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.011). The mean duration was 20.517 ± 1.9143 h in Group A and 22.233 ± 1.6853 h in Group B. Children with the requirement of one dose of rescue analgesia in Group A was 83.3% which was higher than Group B being 66.7%. Children with no analgesic requirement were 16.7% in Group A and 33.3% in Group B. The incidence of side effects was more in Group B (8 [26.7%] children with nausea and vomiting; 1 [3.3%] children with urinary retention) than in Group A (2 [6.6%] children with nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>From the above observations, it can be concluded that morphine of less dosage (20 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>) when added to 0.2% ropivacaine for the caudal epidural block has better efficacy than morphine of higher dosage (30 μg.kg<sup>-1</sup>) as the duration of analgesia is similar with decreased incidence of side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"360-365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9814005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_120_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_120_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:任何疾病最可怕的症状之一就是疼痛。这是一种复杂而非凡的体验,尤其是在儿童身上。已经通过不同的途径给药了各种方法和药物。区域麻醉在婴儿和儿童中产生了极好的术后镇痛和停止应激反应。尾部硬膜外镇痛是为儿童腹部、会阴和下肢手术提供术中和术后镇痛的最可接受和最受欢迎的方法。使用不含防腐剂的吗啡作为罗哌卡因的辅助药物可以提高镇痛的质量和持续时间,尽管有各种副作用。各种文章使用不同剂量的吗啡作为硬膜外尾部镇痛的辅助药物。因此,我们进行了这项研究,以比较两种剂量的吗啡,即20μg.kg-1和尾侧硬膜外吗啡30μg.kg-1,用于脐下手术的疗效、安全性和副作用。材料和方法:本研究为前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。60名患者被分为两组。A组:在0.2%罗哌卡因1mL.kg-1中加入吗啡20μg.kg-1制成溶液。B组:在0.2%罗哌卡因1mL·kg~(-1)中加入吗啡30μg.kg~(-2)。在记录15分钟、30分钟、45分钟、1小时、2小时、4小时、8小时、12小时、16小时、18小时和24小时后,立即记录心率、收缩压、舒张压、SPO2、疼痛评分和镇静评分。结果:两组平均镇痛持续时间相似(P=0.011),A组平均为20.517±1.9143h,B组平均为22.233±1.6853h。A组需要一次镇痛的儿童为83.3%,高于B组的66.7%。无镇痛需求的儿童为16.7%,B组为33.3%。B组恶心呕吐患儿8例(26.7%),尿潴留患儿1例(3.3%),副作用发生率高于A组恶心呕吐儿2例(6.6%)高剂量(30μg.kg-1)与镇痛持续时间相似,副作用发生率降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caudal Morphine in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Two Different Doses in Children Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgery - A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Background: One of the most feared symptoms of any disease is PAIN. It is a complex phenomenal experience, especially in children. Various methods and medications have been administered through different routes. Regional anesthesia produces marvelous postoperative analgesia and cessation of stress response in infants and children. Caudal epidural analgesia is the most acceptable and popular method of providing intra- and postoperative analgesia for abdominal, perineal, and lower limb surgeries in children. The use of preservative-free morphine as an adjunct to ropivacaine increases the quality and duration of analgesia despite the various side effects. Various articles use various doses of morphine as an adjuvant in caudal epidural analgesia. Hence, we conducted the study to compare the two dosages of morphine that is 20 μg.kg-1 and 30 μg.kg-1 of caudal epidural morphine for infraumblical surgeries with regard to its efficacy and safety and side effect profiles.

Materials and methods: The study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Sixty patients were divided into two groups. Group A: 20 μg.kg-1 of morphine was added to 0.2% ropivacaine 1 mL.kg-1 and the solution was made. Group B: 30 μg.kg-1 of morphine was added to 1 mL.kg-1 of 0.2% ropivacaine. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, SPO2, pain score, and sedation score were recorded immediately, after 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 18 h, and 24 h were recorded.

Results: The mean duration of analgesia is similar in both groups (P = 0.011). The mean duration was 20.517 ± 1.9143 h in Group A and 22.233 ± 1.6853 h in Group B. Children with the requirement of one dose of rescue analgesia in Group A was 83.3% which was higher than Group B being 66.7%. Children with no analgesic requirement were 16.7% in Group A and 33.3% in Group B. The incidence of side effects was more in Group B (8 [26.7%] children with nausea and vomiting; 1 [3.3%] children with urinary retention) than in Group A (2 [6.6%] children with nausea and vomiting.

Conclusion: From the above observations, it can be concluded that morphine of less dosage (20 μg.kg-1) when added to 0.2% ropivacaine for the caudal epidural block has better efficacy than morphine of higher dosage (30 μg.kg-1) as the duration of analgesia is similar with decreased incidence of side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1