上颌种植体支持的不同框架材料全弓修复体的生物力学研究:有限元研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.346
Mirac Berke Topcu Ersöz, Emre Mumcu
{"title":"上颌种植体支持的不同框架材料全弓修复体的生物力学研究:有限元研究。","authors":"Mirac Berke Topcu Ersöz,&nbsp;Emre Mumcu","doi":"10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Four and six implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with various framework materials were assessed under different loading conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the edentulous maxilla, the implants were positioned in a configuration of four to six implant modalities. CoCr, Ti, ZrO<sub>2</sub>, and PEEK materials were used to produce the prosthetic structure. Using finite element stress analysis, the first molar was subjected to a 200 N axial and 45° oblique force. Stresses were measured on the bone, implants, abutment screw, abutment, and prosthetic screw. The Von Mises, maximum, and minimum principal stress values were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum and minimum principal stresses in bone were determined as CoCr < ZrO<sub>2</sub> < Ti < PEEK. The Von Mises stresses on the implant, implant screw, abutment, and prosthetic screws were determined as CoCr < ZrO<sub>2</sub> < Ti < PEEK. The highest Von Mises stress was 9584.4 Mpa in PEEK material on the prosthetic screw under 4 implant-oblique loading. The highest maximum principal stress value in bone was found to be 120.89 Mpa, for PEEK in 4 implant-oblique loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For four and six implant-supported structures, and depending on the loading condition, the system accumulated different stresses. The distribution of stress was reduced in materials with a high elastic modulus. When choosing materials for implant-supported fixed prostheses, it is essential to consider both the number of implants and the mechanical and physical attributes of the framework material.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/de/jap-14-346.PMC9832146.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study.\",\"authors\":\"Mirac Berke Topcu Ersöz,&nbsp;Emre Mumcu\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Four and six implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with various framework materials were assessed under different loading conditions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the edentulous maxilla, the implants were positioned in a configuration of four to six implant modalities. CoCr, Ti, ZrO<sub>2</sub>, and PEEK materials were used to produce the prosthetic structure. Using finite element stress analysis, the first molar was subjected to a 200 N axial and 45° oblique force. Stresses were measured on the bone, implants, abutment screw, abutment, and prosthetic screw. The Von Mises, maximum, and minimum principal stress values were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum and minimum principal stresses in bone were determined as CoCr < ZrO<sub>2</sub> < Ti < PEEK. The Von Mises stresses on the implant, implant screw, abutment, and prosthetic screws were determined as CoCr < ZrO<sub>2</sub> < Ti < PEEK. The highest Von Mises stress was 9584.4 Mpa in PEEK material on the prosthetic screw under 4 implant-oblique loading. The highest maximum principal stress value in bone was found to be 120.89 Mpa, for PEEK in 4 implant-oblique loading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For four and six implant-supported structures, and depending on the loading condition, the system accumulated different stresses. The distribution of stress was reduced in materials with a high elastic modulus. When choosing materials for implant-supported fixed prostheses, it is essential to consider both the number of implants and the mechanical and physical attributes of the framework material.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/de/jap-14-346.PMC9832146.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2022.14.6.346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:对4个和6个不同框架材料的种植体支撑固定全弓假体进行不同载荷条件下的评估。材料和方法:在无牙颌中,种植体以四到六种种植方式定位。采用CoCr, Ti, ZrO2和PEEK材料制作假体结构。通过有限元应力分析,第一磨牙承受200 N的轴向力和45°斜向力。测量骨、种植体、基牙螺钉、基牙螺钉和假体螺钉上的应力。计算并比较了Von Mises、最大、最小主应力值。结果:骨内最大、最小主应力为CoCr < ZrO2 < Ti < PEEK。种植体、种植体螺钉、基台和假体螺钉的Von Mises应力为CoCr < ZrO2 < Ti < PEEK。在4次种植体斜向载荷下,PEEK材料在假体螺钉上的Von Mises应力最高为9584.4 Mpa。在4种种植体斜向载荷下,PEEK在骨内的最大主应力值为120.89 Mpa。结论:对于4根和6根种植体支撑结构,根据不同的加载条件,系统积累了不同的应力。在高弹性模量的材料中,应力分布减小。在选择种植体支持的固定假体材料时,必须考虑种植体的数量以及框架材料的机械和物理属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study.

Purpose: Four and six implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with various framework materials were assessed under different loading conditions.

Materials and methods: In the edentulous maxilla, the implants were positioned in a configuration of four to six implant modalities. CoCr, Ti, ZrO2, and PEEK materials were used to produce the prosthetic structure. Using finite element stress analysis, the first molar was subjected to a 200 N axial and 45° oblique force. Stresses were measured on the bone, implants, abutment screw, abutment, and prosthetic screw. The Von Mises, maximum, and minimum principal stress values were calculated and compared.

Results: The maximum and minimum principal stresses in bone were determined as CoCr < ZrO2 < Ti < PEEK. The Von Mises stresses on the implant, implant screw, abutment, and prosthetic screws were determined as CoCr < ZrO2 < Ti < PEEK. The highest Von Mises stress was 9584.4 Mpa in PEEK material on the prosthetic screw under 4 implant-oblique loading. The highest maximum principal stress value in bone was found to be 120.89 Mpa, for PEEK in 4 implant-oblique loading.

Conclusion: For four and six implant-supported structures, and depending on the loading condition, the system accumulated different stresses. The distribution of stress was reduced in materials with a high elastic modulus. When choosing materials for implant-supported fixed prostheses, it is essential to consider both the number of implants and the mechanical and physical attributes of the framework material.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear. Clinical performance of implant-assisted removable partial dentures using implant surveyed crowns: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Effect of cement type, luting protocol, and ceramic abutment material on the shade of cemented titanium-based lithium disilicate crowns and surrounding peri-implant soft tissue: a spectrophotometric analysis. Palatal vault configuration and its influence on intraoral scan time and accuracy in completely edentulous arches: a prospective clinical study. Recording maximal intercuspation and border positions of the mandible with intraoral scanner using the acquisition software's multi-occlusion function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1