认知衰老研究中阿尔茨海默病的遗传倾向和相关特征对招募偏见的影响。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Twin Research and Human Genetics Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1017/thg.2023.26
Lina M Gomez, Brittany L Mitchell, Kerrie McAloney, Jessica Adsett, Natalie Garden, Madeline Wood, Santiago Diaz-Torres, Luis M Garcia-Marin, Michael Breakspear, Nicholas G Martin, Michelle K Lupton
{"title":"认知衰老研究中阿尔茨海默病的遗传倾向和相关特征对招募偏见的影响。","authors":"Lina M Gomez,&nbsp;Brittany L Mitchell,&nbsp;Kerrie McAloney,&nbsp;Jessica Adsett,&nbsp;Natalie Garden,&nbsp;Madeline Wood,&nbsp;Santiago Diaz-Torres,&nbsp;Luis M Garcia-Marin,&nbsp;Michael Breakspear,&nbsp;Nicholas G Martin,&nbsp;Michelle K Lupton","doi":"10.1017/thg.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recruitment of participants for research studies may be subject to bias. The Prospective Imaging Study of Ageing (PISA) aims to characterize the phenotype and natural history of healthy adult Australians at high future risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants approached to take part in PISA were selected from existing cohort studies with available genomewide genetic data for both successfully and unsuccessfully recruited participants, allowing us to investigate the genetic contribution to voluntary recruitment, including the genetic predisposition to AD. We use a polygenic risk score (PRS) approach to test to what extent the genetic risk for AD, and related risk factors predict participation in PISA. We did not identify a significant association of genetic risk for AD with study participation, but we did identify significant associations with PRS for key causal risk factors for AD, IQ, household income and years of education. We also found that older and female participants were more likely to take part in the study. Our findings highlight the importance of considering bias in key risk factors for AD in the recruitment of individuals for cohort studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":"26 3","pages":"209-214"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Genetic Predisposition to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Traits on Recruitment Bias in a Study of Cognitive Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Lina M Gomez,&nbsp;Brittany L Mitchell,&nbsp;Kerrie McAloney,&nbsp;Jessica Adsett,&nbsp;Natalie Garden,&nbsp;Madeline Wood,&nbsp;Santiago Diaz-Torres,&nbsp;Luis M Garcia-Marin,&nbsp;Michael Breakspear,&nbsp;Nicholas G Martin,&nbsp;Michelle K Lupton\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/thg.2023.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recruitment of participants for research studies may be subject to bias. The Prospective Imaging Study of Ageing (PISA) aims to characterize the phenotype and natural history of healthy adult Australians at high future risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants approached to take part in PISA were selected from existing cohort studies with available genomewide genetic data for both successfully and unsuccessfully recruited participants, allowing us to investigate the genetic contribution to voluntary recruitment, including the genetic predisposition to AD. We use a polygenic risk score (PRS) approach to test to what extent the genetic risk for AD, and related risk factors predict participation in PISA. We did not identify a significant association of genetic risk for AD with study participation, but we did identify significant associations with PRS for key causal risk factors for AD, IQ, household income and years of education. We also found that older and female participants were more likely to take part in the study. Our findings highlight the importance of considering bias in key risk factors for AD in the recruitment of individuals for cohort studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"209-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Twin Research and Human Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.26\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2023.26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

招募研究参与者可能存在偏见。老龄化前瞻性影像学研究(PISA)旨在描述未来阿尔茨海默病(AD)高危的健康成年澳大利亚人的表型和自然史。参与PISA的参与者是从现有的队列研究中选择的,这些研究具有成功和失败招募参与者的全基因组遗传数据,使我们能够调查自愿招募的遗传贡献,包括AD的遗传易感性。我们使用多基因风险评分(PRS)方法来测试AD的遗传风险和相关风险因素在多大程度上预测参与PISA。我们没有发现AD的遗传风险与参与研究有显著关联,但我们确实发现了AD、IQ、家庭收入和教育年限的关键因果风险因素与PRS有显著关联。我们还发现,年龄较大和女性参与者更有可能参与这项研究。我们的研究结果强调了在招募个体进行队列研究时,考虑AD关键风险因素的偏差的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Genetic Predisposition to Alzheimer's Disease and Related Traits on Recruitment Bias in a Study of Cognitive Aging.

The recruitment of participants for research studies may be subject to bias. The Prospective Imaging Study of Ageing (PISA) aims to characterize the phenotype and natural history of healthy adult Australians at high future risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants approached to take part in PISA were selected from existing cohort studies with available genomewide genetic data for both successfully and unsuccessfully recruited participants, allowing us to investigate the genetic contribution to voluntary recruitment, including the genetic predisposition to AD. We use a polygenic risk score (PRS) approach to test to what extent the genetic risk for AD, and related risk factors predict participation in PISA. We did not identify a significant association of genetic risk for AD with study participation, but we did identify significant associations with PRS for key causal risk factors for AD, IQ, household income and years of education. We also found that older and female participants were more likely to take part in the study. Our findings highlight the importance of considering bias in key risk factors for AD in the recruitment of individuals for cohort studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Sibling Patterns in the Educational Attainment of Hungarian Twins. Trends in Twin Births and Survival in Rural Spain: Evidence from 18th to 20th Century. Placental Vascular Anastamoses and Associated Pathologies in Dichorionic Twin Gestations. Chorionicity and Psychomotor Development From Infancy to Childhood: The Japan Environment and Children's Study. Common Genetic Influence on the Relationship Between Gaming Addiction and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Young Adults: A Twin Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1