冠状动脉分叉支架术的当前证据和未来展望。

Serkan Kahraman, Ahmet Güner, Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici, Mehmet Ertürk
{"title":"冠状动脉分叉支架术的当前证据和未来展望。","authors":"Serkan Kahraman,&nbsp;Ahmet Güner,&nbsp;Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici,&nbsp;Mehmet Ertürk","doi":"10.5543/tkda.2022.22476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronary bifurcation lesions account for 15%-20% of all percutaneous coronary interven tions and are associated with greater procedural complexity and consequently at higher risk for cardiac adverse events. Early clinical trials in the interventional approach to bifurcation lesions supported provisional stenting. However, the most recent randomized studies have indicated potentially superior results using a double-kissing crush technique, particularly for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. Moreover, many operators recently favor double-kissing mini-culotte, nanocrush, and double-kissing nanocrush stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions. In this review, we describe the traditional and novel bifurcation stenting techniques and the current evidence for each and review general principles for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46993,"journal":{"name":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Evidence and Future Perspective for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Serkan Kahraman,&nbsp;Ahmet Güner,&nbsp;Ahmet Yaşar Çizgici,&nbsp;Mehmet Ertürk\",\"doi\":\"10.5543/tkda.2022.22476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coronary bifurcation lesions account for 15%-20% of all percutaneous coronary interven tions and are associated with greater procedural complexity and consequently at higher risk for cardiac adverse events. Early clinical trials in the interventional approach to bifurcation lesions supported provisional stenting. However, the most recent randomized studies have indicated potentially superior results using a double-kissing crush technique, particularly for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. Moreover, many operators recently favor double-kissing mini-culotte, nanocrush, and double-kissing nanocrush stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions. In this review, we describe the traditional and novel bifurcation stenting techniques and the current evidence for each and review general principles for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.22476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5543/tkda.2022.22476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

冠状动脉分叉病变占所有经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的15%-20%,其操作更复杂,因此发生心脏不良事件的风险更高。早期临床试验对分叉病变的介入治疗支持临时支架植入术。然而,最近的随机研究表明,使用双吻压碎技术可能有更好的结果,特别是对于无保护的左主干分叉远端病变。此外,许多作业者最近倾向于采用双吻微型导管、纳米挤压和双吻纳米挤压支架技术来治疗分叉病变。在这篇综述中,我们描述了传统的和新的分叉支架术和目前的证据,并回顾了分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的一般原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Evidence and Future Perspective for Coronary Bifurcation Stenting.

Coronary bifurcation lesions account for 15%-20% of all percutaneous coronary interven tions and are associated with greater procedural complexity and consequently at higher risk for cardiac adverse events. Early clinical trials in the interventional approach to bifurcation lesions supported provisional stenting. However, the most recent randomized studies have indicated potentially superior results using a double-kissing crush technique, particularly for unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. Moreover, many operators recently favor double-kissing mini-culotte, nanocrush, and double-kissing nanocrush stenting techniques for bifurcation lesions. In this review, we describe the traditional and novel bifurcation stenting techniques and the current evidence for each and review general principles for bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Variation of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Related to Different Vessel Morphology. Debulking of Giant Right Ventricular Lead Vegetation by Percutaneous Approach Under the Direct Real-Time Intracardiac Echocardiography Visualization. Thyroid Functions Are Associated with All-Cause Long-Term Mortality in Elderly Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The Predictive Role of Small Airway Dysfunction in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Predictive Value of the SCORE, SCORE2, and Pooled Cohort Risk Equation Systems in Patients with Hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1