[评估个人声称战斗创伤后应激障碍补偿可信度的多维方法:初步研究]。

Harefuah Pub Date : 2023-09-01
Shlomo Mendlovic, Ofra Bareket, Simion Kertzman, Saed Meree, Ariel Goldman, Rakefet Hod, Yoram Braw
{"title":"[评估个人声称战斗创伤后应激障碍补偿可信度的多维方法:初步研究]。","authors":"Shlomo Mendlovic,&nbsp;Ofra Bareket,&nbsp;Simion Kertzman,&nbsp;Saed Meree,&nbsp;Ariel Goldman,&nbsp;Rakefet Hod,&nbsp;Yoram Braw","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosis of combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is largely based on the subjective reports of the claimant and is therefore prone to over-diagnosis of symptoms. Over-diagnosis of combat PTSD is associated with harm. Therefore, it is important to assess the claimant's credibility in assessing PTSD as accurately as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":12965,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"162 8","pages":"481-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[MULTI-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH FOR ASSESSING CREDIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS CLAIMING COMBAT PTSD COMPENSATIONS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY].\",\"authors\":\"Shlomo Mendlovic,&nbsp;Ofra Bareket,&nbsp;Simion Kertzman,&nbsp;Saed Meree,&nbsp;Ariel Goldman,&nbsp;Rakefet Hod,&nbsp;Yoram Braw\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diagnosis of combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is largely based on the subjective reports of the claimant and is therefore prone to over-diagnosis of symptoms. Over-diagnosis of combat PTSD is associated with harm. Therefore, it is important to assess the claimant's credibility in assessing PTSD as accurately as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harefuah\",\"volume\":\"162 8\",\"pages\":\"481-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harefuah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:战斗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的诊断很大程度上是基于索赔人的主观报告,因此容易过度诊断症状。战斗创伤后应激障碍的过度诊断与伤害有关。因此,评估索赔人在评估PTSD时尽可能准确的可信度是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[MULTI-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH FOR ASSESSING CREDIBILITY OF INDIVIDUALS CLAIMING COMBAT PTSD COMPENSATIONS: A PRELIMINARY STUDY].

Introduction: Diagnosis of combat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is largely based on the subjective reports of the claimant and is therefore prone to over-diagnosis of symptoms. Over-diagnosis of combat PTSD is associated with harm. Therefore, it is important to assess the claimant's credibility in assessing PTSD as accurately as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[MENTAL HEALTH RISK MANAGEMENT: A THEORETICAL CHALLENGE TO APPLICABLE PRACTICE]. [PUBLIC EXPENDITURE ON MENTAL HEALTH IN ISRAEL: CALCULATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON]. [SAFETY CLIMATE AT WORK, ROLE PERCEPTION AND THE EFFECT OF THEIR INTERACTIONS ON PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS AND JOB SATISFACTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG NURSING STAFF MEMBERS IN PSYCHIATRIC WARDS]. [COPING WITH THE UNSEEN WOUNDS TO EVALUATE THE HANDICAPS CAUSED BY PTSD]. [SLEEP MONITORING FOR PREDICTION OF MAJOR DEPRESSION RECURRENCE IN PATIENTS AT HIGH RISK - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1