实施和利用基于网络的部门年度教师评审计划。

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1097/CEH.0000000000000488
Stephanie K Mueller, Christina Pascal, John Spiers, Ellen W Seely
{"title":"实施和利用基于网络的部门年度教师评审计划。","authors":"Stephanie K Mueller,&nbsp;Christina Pascal,&nbsp;John Spiers,&nbsp;Ellen W Seely","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Supporting faculty in their professional development is a central mission of academic medical centers (AMCs), assisted by routine assessment of faculty development. However, AMCs face barriers to standard faculty assessment, particularly among large departments with diverse faculty roles. We report on the development, implementation, and utilization of a standardized, web-based faculty annual career review (FACR) process deployed within the Department of Medicine at a large AMC, composed of 22 divisions and 1400 faculty. The FACR process was developed to achieve the following goals: Creation of a trackable review of professional goals and barriers to professional development; provide longitudinal faculty reflection on professional growth; and provide data to identify faculty development needs to target initiatives. The FACR was initiated in 2008. We provide specific case examples of utilization of the FACR data for targeted faculty development initiatives, including (1) division benchmarking; (2) targeting career opportunities to individual faculty members; and (3) longitudinal data analysis of 5-year trends of FACR response, including subanalysis by gender, to target faculty development initiatives across the DOM. In summary, we demonstrate successful development, implementation, and utilization of a web-based standard faculty annual review program within a large AMC that allows for systematic evaluation and reflection of professional development by faculty members and their supervisors and allows for data collection and analysis to help target faculty development initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":"43 3","pages":"198-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Utilization of a Web-Based Departmental Annual Faculty Review Program.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie K Mueller,&nbsp;Christina Pascal,&nbsp;John Spiers,&nbsp;Ellen W Seely\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Supporting faculty in their professional development is a central mission of academic medical centers (AMCs), assisted by routine assessment of faculty development. However, AMCs face barriers to standard faculty assessment, particularly among large departments with diverse faculty roles. We report on the development, implementation, and utilization of a standardized, web-based faculty annual career review (FACR) process deployed within the Department of Medicine at a large AMC, composed of 22 divisions and 1400 faculty. The FACR process was developed to achieve the following goals: Creation of a trackable review of professional goals and barriers to professional development; provide longitudinal faculty reflection on professional growth; and provide data to identify faculty development needs to target initiatives. The FACR was initiated in 2008. We provide specific case examples of utilization of the FACR data for targeted faculty development initiatives, including (1) division benchmarking; (2) targeting career opportunities to individual faculty members; and (3) longitudinal data analysis of 5-year trends of FACR response, including subanalysis by gender, to target faculty development initiatives across the DOM. In summary, we demonstrate successful development, implementation, and utilization of a web-based standard faculty annual review program within a large AMC that allows for systematic evaluation and reflection of professional development by faculty members and their supervisors and allows for data collection and analysis to help target faculty development initiatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\"43 3\",\"pages\":\"198-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000488\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:支持教师的专业发展是学术医学中心(amc)的核心任务,辅助教师发展的常规评估。然而,amc面临着标准教师评估的障碍,特别是在教师角色多样化的大型院系中。我们报告了一个标准化的、基于网络的教师年度职业评估(FACR)流程的开发、实施和利用,该流程部署在一个大型AMC的医学系,由22个部门和1400名教师组成。制定FACR流程是为了实现以下目标:创建对专业目标和专业发展障碍的可跟踪审查;为教师提供专业成长的纵向反思;并提供数据,以确定教师的发展需要,以目标倡议。FACR于2008年启动。我们提供了将FACR数据用于有针对性的教师发展计划的具体案例,包括:(1)部门基准;(2)为个别教师提供就业机会;(3)对FACR响应的5年趋势进行纵向数据分析,包括按性别进行亚分析,以针对整个DOM的教师发展举措。总之,我们展示了在大型AMC中成功开发、实施和利用基于网络的标准教师年度评估计划,该计划允许教师及其主管对专业发展进行系统评估和反思,并允许数据收集和分析,以帮助目标教师发展计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation and Utilization of a Web-Based Departmental Annual Faculty Review Program.

Abstract: Supporting faculty in their professional development is a central mission of academic medical centers (AMCs), assisted by routine assessment of faculty development. However, AMCs face barriers to standard faculty assessment, particularly among large departments with diverse faculty roles. We report on the development, implementation, and utilization of a standardized, web-based faculty annual career review (FACR) process deployed within the Department of Medicine at a large AMC, composed of 22 divisions and 1400 faculty. The FACR process was developed to achieve the following goals: Creation of a trackable review of professional goals and barriers to professional development; provide longitudinal faculty reflection on professional growth; and provide data to identify faculty development needs to target initiatives. The FACR was initiated in 2008. We provide specific case examples of utilization of the FACR data for targeted faculty development initiatives, including (1) division benchmarking; (2) targeting career opportunities to individual faculty members; and (3) longitudinal data analysis of 5-year trends of FACR response, including subanalysis by gender, to target faculty development initiatives across the DOM. In summary, we demonstrate successful development, implementation, and utilization of a web-based standard faculty annual review program within a large AMC that allows for systematic evaluation and reflection of professional development by faculty members and their supervisors and allows for data collection and analysis to help target faculty development initiatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
期刊最新文献
Differences in Physician Performance and Self-rated Confidence on High- and Low-Stakes Knowledge Assessments in Board Certification. Paving the Way Forward for Evidence-Based Continuing Professional Development. Development of a Communication Skills Training to Enhance Effective Team Communication in Oncology. Evolution of a Continuing Professional Development Program Based on a Community of Practice Model for Health Care Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings. Where do Physiotherapists Search for Information? Barriers in Translating Scientific Information into Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1