不同富含纤维成分对生长猪能量值、微生物群组成和SCFA分布的时间过程影响

IF 6.3 Animal Nutrition Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aninu.2022.10.003
Qingtao Gao , Zhengqun Liu , Kai Li , Guosong Bai , Lei Liu , Ruqing Zhong , Liang Chen , Hongfu Zhang
{"title":"不同富含纤维成分对生长猪能量值、微生物群组成和SCFA分布的时间过程影响","authors":"Qingtao Gao ,&nbsp;Zhengqun Liu ,&nbsp;Kai Li ,&nbsp;Guosong Bai ,&nbsp;Lei Liu ,&nbsp;Ruqing Zhong ,&nbsp;Liang Chen ,&nbsp;Hongfu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.aninu.2022.10.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study was to investigate time-course effects of different types of dietary fiber on the energy values, fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration in growing pigs. A total of 24 barrows (initial body weight, 19.8 ± 0.5 kg) were assigned to 4 dietary treatments based on body weight (BW) in a completely randomized design, including a basal diet (CON) and 3 fiber-rich diets replacing corn, soybean meal and soybean oil in the CON diet with 20% sugar beet pulp (SBP), defatted rice bran (DFRB) or soybean hull (SBH), respectively. Fresh feces were sampled on d 7, 14 and 21, followed by 5 d total feces and urine collections. The results showed that there were no differences in DE and ME between any of the fiber ingredients on d 7, 14 or 21. However, fiber inclusion decreased the DE and ME of the diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) regardless of the time effect. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed distinctly different microbial communities on the DFRB diet and SBH diet across different times (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and the fecal microbiota of the 4 diet groups demonstrated notably distinct clusters at each time point (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). With adaptation time increased from 7 to 21 d, cellulose-degrading bacteria and SCFA-producing bacteria (e.g., <em>Ruminococcaceae</em><em>_UCG-014</em>, <em>Rikenellaceae</em><em>_RC9_gut_group</em> and <em>Bifidobacterium</em>) increased in the fiber inclusion diets, and pathogenic genera (e.g., <em>Streptococcus</em> and <em>Selenomonas</em>) were increased in the basal diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, the gut microbiota of growing pigs adapted more easily and quickly to the SBP diet compared to the DFRB diet, as reflected by the concentration of propionate, butyrate, isovalerate and total SCFA which increased with time for growing pigs fed the DFRB diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Collectively, our results indicated at least 7 d adaptation was required to evaluate the energy values of fiber-rich ingredients, as the hindgut microbiota of growing pigs may need more time to adapt to a high fiber diet, especially for insoluble dietary fiber.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":62604,"journal":{"name":"Animal Nutrition","volume":"12 ","pages":"Pages 263-275"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/0d/main.PMC9868344.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-course effects of different fiber-rich ingredients on energy values, microbiota composition and SCFA profile in growing pigs\",\"authors\":\"Qingtao Gao ,&nbsp;Zhengqun Liu ,&nbsp;Kai Li ,&nbsp;Guosong Bai ,&nbsp;Lei Liu ,&nbsp;Ruqing Zhong ,&nbsp;Liang Chen ,&nbsp;Hongfu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aninu.2022.10.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study was to investigate time-course effects of different types of dietary fiber on the energy values, fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration in growing pigs. A total of 24 barrows (initial body weight, 19.8 ± 0.5 kg) were assigned to 4 dietary treatments based on body weight (BW) in a completely randomized design, including a basal diet (CON) and 3 fiber-rich diets replacing corn, soybean meal and soybean oil in the CON diet with 20% sugar beet pulp (SBP), defatted rice bran (DFRB) or soybean hull (SBH), respectively. Fresh feces were sampled on d 7, 14 and 21, followed by 5 d total feces and urine collections. The results showed that there were no differences in DE and ME between any of the fiber ingredients on d 7, 14 or 21. However, fiber inclusion decreased the DE and ME of the diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) regardless of the time effect. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed distinctly different microbial communities on the DFRB diet and SBH diet across different times (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and the fecal microbiota of the 4 diet groups demonstrated notably distinct clusters at each time point (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). With adaptation time increased from 7 to 21 d, cellulose-degrading bacteria and SCFA-producing bacteria (e.g., <em>Ruminococcaceae</em><em>_UCG-014</em>, <em>Rikenellaceae</em><em>_RC9_gut_group</em> and <em>Bifidobacterium</em>) increased in the fiber inclusion diets, and pathogenic genera (e.g., <em>Streptococcus</em> and <em>Selenomonas</em>) were increased in the basal diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, the gut microbiota of growing pigs adapted more easily and quickly to the SBP diet compared to the DFRB diet, as reflected by the concentration of propionate, butyrate, isovalerate and total SCFA which increased with time for growing pigs fed the DFRB diet (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Collectively, our results indicated at least 7 d adaptation was required to evaluate the energy values of fiber-rich ingredients, as the hindgut microbiota of growing pigs may need more time to adapt to a high fiber diet, especially for insoluble dietary fiber.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":62604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 263-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9c/0d/main.PMC9868344.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405654522001494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405654522001494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在研究不同类型膳食纤维对生长猪能量值、粪便微生物群和短链脂肪酸(SCFA)浓度的时间过程影响。根据体重(BW),采用完全随机设计,将24头(初始体重19.8±0.5kg)的手推车分为4个日粮处理,包括基础日粮(CON)和3个富含纤维的日粮,分别用20%甜菜浆(SBP)、脱脂米糠(DFRB)或大豆壳(SBH)代替CON日粮中的玉米、豆粕和豆油。在第7天、第14天和第21天采集新鲜粪便,然后采集第5天的总粪便和尿液。结果表明,在第7天、第14天或第21天,任何纤维成分的DE和ME都没有差异。然而,无论时间效应如何,纤维包合物都降低了日粮的DE和ME(P<;0.05)。主坐标分析(PCoA)显示,DFRB饮食和SBH饮食在不同时间段的微生物群落明显不同(P<;0.05),4个饮食组的粪便微生物群在每个时间点都表现出明显不同的集群(P<)。随着适应时间从7天增加到21天,纤维素降解菌和SCFA产生菌(如Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014、Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group和Bifidobacterium)在纤维包合日粮中增加,致病属(如链球菌和Selenomonas)在基础日粮中增多(P<;0.05)。此外,与DFRB日粮相比,生长猪的肠道微生物群更容易、更快地适应SBP日粮,如丙酸盐、丁酸盐、异戊酸盐和总SCFA的浓度所反映的,这些浓度随着喂食DFRB日料的生长猪的时间而增加(P<;0.05),我们的研究结果表明,评估富含纤维成分的能量值至少需要7天的适应期,因为生长猪的后肠微生物群可能需要更多的时间来适应高纤维饮食,尤其是不溶性膳食纤维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-course effects of different fiber-rich ingredients on energy values, microbiota composition and SCFA profile in growing pigs

This study was to investigate time-course effects of different types of dietary fiber on the energy values, fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentration in growing pigs. A total of 24 barrows (initial body weight, 19.8 ± 0.5 kg) were assigned to 4 dietary treatments based on body weight (BW) in a completely randomized design, including a basal diet (CON) and 3 fiber-rich diets replacing corn, soybean meal and soybean oil in the CON diet with 20% sugar beet pulp (SBP), defatted rice bran (DFRB) or soybean hull (SBH), respectively. Fresh feces were sampled on d 7, 14 and 21, followed by 5 d total feces and urine collections. The results showed that there were no differences in DE and ME between any of the fiber ingredients on d 7, 14 or 21. However, fiber inclusion decreased the DE and ME of the diet (P < 0.05) regardless of the time effect. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed distinctly different microbial communities on the DFRB diet and SBH diet across different times (P < 0.05) and the fecal microbiota of the 4 diet groups demonstrated notably distinct clusters at each time point (P < 0.05). With adaptation time increased from 7 to 21 d, cellulose-degrading bacteria and SCFA-producing bacteria (e.g., Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group and Bifidobacterium) increased in the fiber inclusion diets, and pathogenic genera (e.g., Streptococcus and Selenomonas) were increased in the basal diet (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the gut microbiota of growing pigs adapted more easily and quickly to the SBP diet compared to the DFRB diet, as reflected by the concentration of propionate, butyrate, isovalerate and total SCFA which increased with time for growing pigs fed the DFRB diet (P < 0.05). Collectively, our results indicated at least 7 d adaptation was required to evaluate the energy values of fiber-rich ingredients, as the hindgut microbiota of growing pigs may need more time to adapt to a high fiber diet, especially for insoluble dietary fiber.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Nutrition
Animal Nutrition Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
542
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Animal Nutrition encompasses the full gamut of animal nutritional sciences and reviews including, but not limited to, fundamental aspects of animal nutrition such as nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics and molecular and cell biology related to primarily to the nutrition of farm animals and aquatic species. More applied aspects of animal nutrition, such as the evaluation of novel ingredients, feed additives and feed safety will also be considered but it is expected that such studies will have a strong nutritional focus. Animal Nutrition is indexed in SCIE, PubMed Central, Scopus, DOAJ, etc.
期刊最新文献
Re-evaluation of recent research on metabolic utilization of energy in poultry: Recommendations for a net energy system for broilers Editorial Board Effects of essential oils on economically important characteristics of ruminant species: A comprehensive review Mulberry leaf supplementation inhibits skatole deposition by regulating gut microbiota and upregulating liver cytochrome P450 1A1 expression in finishing pigs Zinc lactate alleviates oxidative stress by modulating crosstalk between constitutive androstane receptor signaling pathway and gut microbiota profile in weaned piglets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1