COVID-19大流行期间对老年人的年龄歧视和其他主义的交集

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.1111/josi.12574
Luisa Ramirez, Caitlin Monahan, Ximena Palacios-Espinosa, Sheri R. Levy
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间对老年人的年龄歧视和其他主义的交集","authors":"Luisa Ramirez,&nbsp;Caitlin Monahan,&nbsp;Ximena Palacios-Espinosa,&nbsp;Sheri R. Levy","doi":"10.1111/josi.12574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a significant global issue that has exacerbated pre-existing structural and social inequalities. There are concerns that ageism toward older adults has intensified in conjunction with elevated forms of other “isms” such as ableism, classism, heterosexism, racism, and sexism. This study offers a systematic review (PRISMA) of ageism toward older adults interacting with other isms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in 10 databases resulting in 354 ageism studies published between 2019 and August 2022 in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish. Only 32 articles met eligibility criteria (ageism together with other ism(s); focus on the COVID-19 pandemic); which were mostly review papers (<i>n</i> = 25) with few empirical papers (<i>n</i> = 7), reflecting almost all qualitative designs (<i>n</i> = 6). Articles discussed ageism with racism (<i>n</i> = 15), classism (<i>n</i> = 11), ableism (<i>n</i> = 9), sexism (<i>n</i> = 7), and heterosexism (<i>n</i> = 2). Authors represented numerous disciplines (gerontology, medicine, nursing, psychology, social work, and sociology) and countries (<i>n</i> = 14) from several continents. Results from this study underscore that ageism intersects with other isms in profoundly negative ways and that the intersections of ageism and other isms are understudied, requiring more research and intervention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":"78 4","pages":"965-990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersections of ageism toward older adults and other isms during the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Ramirez,&nbsp;Caitlin Monahan,&nbsp;Ximena Palacios-Espinosa,&nbsp;Sheri R. Levy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josi.12574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic is a significant global issue that has exacerbated pre-existing structural and social inequalities. There are concerns that ageism toward older adults has intensified in conjunction with elevated forms of other “isms” such as ableism, classism, heterosexism, racism, and sexism. This study offers a systematic review (PRISMA) of ageism toward older adults interacting with other isms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in 10 databases resulting in 354 ageism studies published between 2019 and August 2022 in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish. Only 32 articles met eligibility criteria (ageism together with other ism(s); focus on the COVID-19 pandemic); which were mostly review papers (<i>n</i> = 25) with few empirical papers (<i>n</i> = 7), reflecting almost all qualitative designs (<i>n</i> = 6). Articles discussed ageism with racism (<i>n</i> = 15), classism (<i>n</i> = 11), ableism (<i>n</i> = 9), sexism (<i>n</i> = 7), and heterosexism (<i>n</i> = 2). Authors represented numerous disciplines (gerontology, medicine, nursing, psychology, social work, and sociology) and countries (<i>n</i> = 14) from several continents. Results from this study underscore that ageism intersects with other isms in profoundly negative ways and that the intersections of ageism and other isms are understudied, requiring more research and intervention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"78 4\",\"pages\":\"965-990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12574\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行是一个重大的全球问题,加剧了原有的结构性和社会不平等。人们担心,针对老年人的年龄歧视与其他形式的“歧视”(如残疾歧视、阶级歧视、异性恋歧视、种族主义和性别歧视)一起加剧。本研究对COVID-19大流行期间与其他主义相互作用的老年人年龄歧视进行了系统回顾(PRISMA)。研究人员在10个数据库中检索了2019年至2022年8月期间以英语、法语、葡萄牙语或西班牙语发表的354篇年龄歧视研究。只有32条符合资格标准(年龄歧视和其他歧视);重点关注2019冠状病毒病大流行);其中以综述论文(n = 25)为主,实证论文(n = 7)较少,反映了几乎所有的定性设计(n = 6)。文章讨论了种族歧视(n = 15)、阶级歧视(n = 11)、残疾歧视(n = 9)、性别歧视(n = 7)和异性恋歧视(n = 2)。作者代表了多个学科(老年学、医学、护理学、心理学、社会工作和社会学)和来自几个大洲的国家(n = 14)。这项研究的结果强调,年龄歧视与其他主义以极其消极的方式交叉,年龄歧视与其他主义的交叉尚未得到充分研究,需要更多的研究和干预努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intersections of ageism toward older adults and other isms during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic is a significant global issue that has exacerbated pre-existing structural and social inequalities. There are concerns that ageism toward older adults has intensified in conjunction with elevated forms of other “isms” such as ableism, classism, heterosexism, racism, and sexism. This study offers a systematic review (PRISMA) of ageism toward older adults interacting with other isms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in 10 databases resulting in 354 ageism studies published between 2019 and August 2022 in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish. Only 32 articles met eligibility criteria (ageism together with other ism(s); focus on the COVID-19 pandemic); which were mostly review papers (n = 25) with few empirical papers (n = 7), reflecting almost all qualitative designs (n = 6). Articles discussed ageism with racism (n = 15), classism (n = 11), ableism (n = 9), sexism (n = 7), and heterosexism (n = 2). Authors represented numerous disciplines (gerontology, medicine, nursing, psychology, social work, and sociology) and countries (n = 14) from several continents. Results from this study underscore that ageism intersects with other isms in profoundly negative ways and that the intersections of ageism and other isms are understudied, requiring more research and intervention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Challenging the Status-Quo with Practical Theory: Introduction to John T. Jost's Kurt Lewin Award Address From oppressive to affirmative: Situating the health and well-being of LGBTIQ+ people as impacted by systemic and structural transitions in Russia, Turkey, Pakistan, and India Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research – Acknowledging differences across subpopulations, methods, and countries The damaging legacy of damage-centered LGBTIQ+ research: Implications for healthcare and LGBTIQ+ health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1