COVID-19大流行期间牙科学生对在线学习的态度和观点:一项跨部门、多所大学的研究

IF 1.4 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Stomatologica Croatica Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.15644/asc56/4/6
Domagoj Vražić, Larisa Musić, Marina Barbarić, Ana Badovinac, Laura Plančak, Ivan Puhar
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间牙科学生对在线学习的态度和观点:一项跨部门、多所大学的研究","authors":"Domagoj Vražić,&nbsp;Larisa Musić,&nbsp;Marina Barbarić,&nbsp;Ana Badovinac,&nbsp;Laura Plančak,&nbsp;Ivan Puhar","doi":"10.15644/asc56/4/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the attitude and perspectives of dental students of four Croatian universities towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An anonymous internet-based survey was administered to undergraduate dental medicine students at the Universities of Zagreb, Rijeka, Split and Osijek. The 29-item questionnaire collected data on students' demographics, online learning organization and management, and perception of online classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and four participants (85.1% female) took part in the survey. The majority of the participants (63.5%) were from the University of Zagreb. 39.6% of students reported agreement regarding online learning satisfaction. Individual university satisfaction ratings on overall online learning were: Osijek 3.69, Zagreb 3.22, Split 3.05 and Rijeka 2.64. Most students considered that lectures (82.9%) and seminars (78.9%) could be successfully delivered in an online learning format. The online learning format cannot successfully deliver laboratory, preclinical, clinical practicals or clinical clerkship, as agreed by more than 80% of the total student sample. 60% of students consider online learning a valuable alternative to face-to-face instruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online learning was highly praised for educational formats such as lectures and seminars, and was considered a useful substitute for conventional learning. Conventional practical courses cannot be substituted with online learning. Overall perspective about online learning was mixed among the students of four universities. The findings of the present study can serve to help individual universities address the shortcomings and reinforce the strengths of their OL programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7154,"journal":{"name":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","volume":"56 4","pages":"395-404"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/67/ASC_56(4)_395-404.PMC9873008.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dental Students' Attitudes and Perspectives regarding Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-sectional, Multi-university Study.\",\"authors\":\"Domagoj Vražić,&nbsp;Larisa Musić,&nbsp;Marina Barbarić,&nbsp;Ana Badovinac,&nbsp;Laura Plančak,&nbsp;Ivan Puhar\",\"doi\":\"10.15644/asc56/4/6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the attitude and perspectives of dental students of four Croatian universities towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An anonymous internet-based survey was administered to undergraduate dental medicine students at the Universities of Zagreb, Rijeka, Split and Osijek. The 29-item questionnaire collected data on students' demographics, online learning organization and management, and perception of online classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and four participants (85.1% female) took part in the survey. The majority of the participants (63.5%) were from the University of Zagreb. 39.6% of students reported agreement regarding online learning satisfaction. Individual university satisfaction ratings on overall online learning were: Osijek 3.69, Zagreb 3.22, Split 3.05 and Rijeka 2.64. Most students considered that lectures (82.9%) and seminars (78.9%) could be successfully delivered in an online learning format. The online learning format cannot successfully deliver laboratory, preclinical, clinical practicals or clinical clerkship, as agreed by more than 80% of the total student sample. 60% of students consider online learning a valuable alternative to face-to-face instruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Online learning was highly praised for educational formats such as lectures and seminars, and was considered a useful substitute for conventional learning. Conventional practical courses cannot be substituted with online learning. Overall perspective about online learning was mixed among the students of four universities. The findings of the present study can serve to help individual universities address the shortcomings and reinforce the strengths of their OL programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"volume\":\"56 4\",\"pages\":\"395-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/67/ASC_56(4)_395-404.PMC9873008.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Stomatologica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/4/6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Stomatologica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/4/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估2019冠状病毒病大流行期间克罗地亚四所大学牙科专业学生对在线学习的态度和观点。材料和方法:对萨格勒布、里耶卡、斯普利特和奥西耶克大学牙科医学本科学生进行匿名网络调查。这份29项调查问卷收集了学生的人口统计、在线学习组织和管理以及对在线课程的看法等数据。结果:共有54人参与调查,其中女性占85.1%。大多数参与者(63.5%)来自萨格勒布大学,39.6%的学生报告了对在线学习满意度的认同。个别大学对整体在线学习的满意度评分为:奥西耶克大学3.69分,萨格勒布大学3.22分,斯普利特大学3.05分,里耶卡大学2.64分。大多数学生认为讲座(82.9%)和研讨会(78.9%)可以成功地以在线学习的形式进行。超过80%的学生样本同意,在线学习模式不能成功地提供实验室、临床前、临床实践或临床实习。60%的学生认为在线学习是面对面教学的一个有价值的选择。结论:在线学习以讲座和研讨会等教育形式受到高度赞扬,被认为是传统学习的有用替代品。传统的实践课程不能被在线学习所取代。四所大学的学生对在线学习的总体看法不一。本研究的结果可以帮助个别大学解决其OL计划的不足之处并加强其优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dental Students' Attitudes and Perspectives regarding Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-sectional, Multi-university Study.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the attitude and perspectives of dental students of four Croatian universities towards online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and methods: An anonymous internet-based survey was administered to undergraduate dental medicine students at the Universities of Zagreb, Rijeka, Split and Osijek. The 29-item questionnaire collected data on students' demographics, online learning organization and management, and perception of online classes.

Results: Five hundred and four participants (85.1% female) took part in the survey. The majority of the participants (63.5%) were from the University of Zagreb. 39.6% of students reported agreement regarding online learning satisfaction. Individual university satisfaction ratings on overall online learning were: Osijek 3.69, Zagreb 3.22, Split 3.05 and Rijeka 2.64. Most students considered that lectures (82.9%) and seminars (78.9%) could be successfully delivered in an online learning format. The online learning format cannot successfully deliver laboratory, preclinical, clinical practicals or clinical clerkship, as agreed by more than 80% of the total student sample. 60% of students consider online learning a valuable alternative to face-to-face instruction.

Conclusion: Online learning was highly praised for educational formats such as lectures and seminars, and was considered a useful substitute for conventional learning. Conventional practical courses cannot be substituted with online learning. Overall perspective about online learning was mixed among the students of four universities. The findings of the present study can serve to help individual universities address the shortcomings and reinforce the strengths of their OL programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Acta Stomatologica Croatica DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
28.60%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Acta Stomatologica Croatica (ASCRO) is a leading scientific non-profit journal in the field of dental, oral and cranio-facial sciences during the past 44 years in Croatia. ASCRO publishes original scientific and clinical papers, preliminary communications, case reports, book reviews, letters to the editor and news. Review articles are published by invitation from the Editor-in-Chief by acclaimed professionals in distinct fields of dental medicine. All manuscripts are subjected to peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Age Determination Based on Open Apex Measurement in the Developing Dentition: Comparing the Accuracy of the Belgrade Age Formula (BAF) with the European Formula on a Bosnian Children Population. Differences between Doctors of Dental Medicine and Doctors of Medicine Awareness of Their Online Image and Perception Concerns: a Quantitative Cross-Sectional Study. Evaluation of the Bond Strength between the Acrylic Teeth and Reinforced or Non-reinforced Complete Denture Base. Exploring the Root Canal Morphology of Third Molars in the Bosnia and Herzegovina Population. Legal Dental Age Thresholds Estimation in Croatian Children and Adolescents: Accuracy of the Olze, Haavikko, and Demirjian Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1