Helena Kyunghee Kim, Daniel M Blumberger, Jordan F Karp, Eric Lenze, Charles F Reynolds, Benoit H Mulsant
{"title":"文拉法辛XR治疗老年抑郁症患者:何时改变治疗的决策树","authors":"Helena Kyunghee Kim, Daniel M Blumberger, Jordan F Karp, Eric Lenze, Charles F Reynolds, Benoit H Mulsant","doi":"10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictors of antidepressant response in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) need to be confirmed before they can guide treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create decision trees for early identification of older patients with MDD who are unlikely to respond to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, we analysed data from 454 older participants treated with venlafaxine XR (150-300 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks in the Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected the earliest decision point when we could detect participants who had not yet responded (defined as >50% symptom improvement) but would do so after 12 weeks of treatment. Using receiver operating characteristic models, we created two decision trees to minimise either false identification of future responders (false positives) or false identification of future non-responders (false negatives). These decision trees integrated baseline characteristics and treatment response at the early decision point as predictors.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>We selected week 4 as the optimal early decision point. Both decision trees shared minimal symptom reduction at week 4, longer episode duration and not having responded to an antidepressant previously as predictors of non-response. Test negative predictive values of the leftmost terminal node of the two trees were 77.4% and 76.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our decision trees have the potential to guide treatment in older patients with MDD but they require to be validated in other larger samples.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Once confirmed, our findings may be used to guide changes in antidepressant treatment in older patients with poor early response.</p>","PeriodicalId":12233,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134194/pdf/ebmental-2022-300479.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Venlafaxine XR treatment for older patients with major depressive disorder: decision trees for when to change treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Helena Kyunghee Kim, Daniel M Blumberger, Jordan F Karp, Eric Lenze, Charles F Reynolds, Benoit H Mulsant\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predictors of antidepressant response in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) need to be confirmed before they can guide treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create decision trees for early identification of older patients with MDD who are unlikely to respond to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, we analysed data from 454 older participants treated with venlafaxine XR (150-300 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks in the Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected the earliest decision point when we could detect participants who had not yet responded (defined as >50% symptom improvement) but would do so after 12 weeks of treatment. Using receiver operating characteristic models, we created two decision trees to minimise either false identification of future responders (false positives) or false identification of future non-responders (false negatives). These decision trees integrated baseline characteristics and treatment response at the early decision point as predictors.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>We selected week 4 as the optimal early decision point. Both decision trees shared minimal symptom reduction at week 4, longer episode duration and not having responded to an antidepressant previously as predictors of non-response. Test negative predictive values of the leftmost terminal node of the two trees were 77.4% and 76.6%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our decision trees have the potential to guide treatment in older patients with MDD but they require to be validated in other larger samples.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Once confirmed, our findings may be used to guide changes in antidepressant treatment in older patients with poor early response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10134194/pdf/ebmental-2022-300479.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2022-300479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Venlafaxine XR treatment for older patients with major depressive disorder: decision trees for when to change treatment.
Background: Predictors of antidepressant response in older patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) need to be confirmed before they can guide treatment.
Objective: To create decision trees for early identification of older patients with MDD who are unlikely to respond to 12 weeks of antidepressant treatment, we analysed data from 454 older participants treated with venlafaxine XR (150-300 mg/day) for up to 12 weeks in the Incomplete Response in Late-Life Depression: Getting to Remission study.
Methods: We selected the earliest decision point when we could detect participants who had not yet responded (defined as >50% symptom improvement) but would do so after 12 weeks of treatment. Using receiver operating characteristic models, we created two decision trees to minimise either false identification of future responders (false positives) or false identification of future non-responders (false negatives). These decision trees integrated baseline characteristics and treatment response at the early decision point as predictors.
Finding: We selected week 4 as the optimal early decision point. Both decision trees shared minimal symptom reduction at week 4, longer episode duration and not having responded to an antidepressant previously as predictors of non-response. Test negative predictive values of the leftmost terminal node of the two trees were 77.4% and 76.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: Our decision trees have the potential to guide treatment in older patients with MDD but they require to be validated in other larger samples.
Clinical implications: Once confirmed, our findings may be used to guide changes in antidepressant treatment in older patients with poor early response.
期刊介绍:
Evidence-Based Mental Health alerts clinicians to important advances in treatment, diagnosis, aetiology, prognosis, continuing education, economic evaluation and qualitative research in mental health. Published by the British Psychological Society, the Royal College of Psychiatrists and the BMJ Publishing Group the journal surveys a wide range of international medical journals applying strict criteria for the quality and validity of research. Clinicians assess the relevance of the best studies and the key details of these essential studies are presented in a succinct, informative abstract with an expert commentary on its clinical application.Evidence-Based Mental Health is a multidisciplinary, quarterly publication.