Cristiane M Ida, Jose Pulido, Patricia T Greipp, Joaquin J Garcia, Timothy W Olsen, Lauren Dalvin, Diva Regina Salomão
{"title":"葡萄膜黑色素瘤眼内活检标本BAP1免疫染色状态与其他预后标志物高度相关","authors":"Cristiane M Ida, Jose Pulido, Patricia T Greipp, Joaquin J Garcia, Timothy W Olsen, Lauren Dalvin, Diva Regina Salomão","doi":"10.1159/000515858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Loss of BAP1 protein expression emerged as a negative prognostic marker in uveal melanoma (UM) and has primarily been studied in enucleations. Intraocular biopsy is frequently performed prior to UM globe-conserving therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated BAP1 immunostaining of UM in 16 biopsies and 8 subsequent enucleations, and results were correlated with the UM-specific gene expression profile (GEP; <i>n</i> = 11), chromosome 3 status by FISH and/or chromosomal microarray (<i>n</i> = 12; 9 also had GEP), and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UM involved the choroid in 15 (of 16) cases. Biopsy was performed for prognostication (<i>n</i> = 12) or diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 4). Treatment included brachytherapy (<i>n</i> = 13; 5 followed by enucleation) or enucleation only (<i>n</i> = 3). BAP1 nuclear immunostaining was positive in 9, negative in 4, and equivocal in 3 biopsies. For the 3 equivocal biopsies, BAP1 immunostaining was positive in 2 (of 3) subsequent enucleations. BAP1 immunostaining was concordant between all 5 remaining biopsies and enucleations. BAP1-positive biopsies had disomy 3 (<i>n</i> = 6) or 3p loss (<i>n</i> = 1) and class 1 GEP (<i>n</i> = 6). BAP1-negative biopsies had monosomy 3 (<i>n</i> = 3) and class 2 GEP (<i>n</i> = 2). Median follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17-150). For BAP1-positive UM patients, 8 were alive (7 without metastatic disease) and 3 had died (1 melanoma-related death). Among BAP1-negative UM patients, 2 were alive (1 with metastatic disease) and 3 had melanoma-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAP1 immunostaining in biopsies highly correlates with results in subsequent enucleations and with well-established UM prognostic markers, representing a potential additional prognostic tool for UM biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914242/pdf/oop-0008-0022.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BAP1 Immunostain Status in Intraocular Biopsy Specimens for Uveal Melanoma Highly Correlates with Other Prognostic Markers.\",\"authors\":\"Cristiane M Ida, Jose Pulido, Patricia T Greipp, Joaquin J Garcia, Timothy W Olsen, Lauren Dalvin, Diva Regina Salomão\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000515858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Loss of BAP1 protein expression emerged as a negative prognostic marker in uveal melanoma (UM) and has primarily been studied in enucleations. Intraocular biopsy is frequently performed prior to UM globe-conserving therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated BAP1 immunostaining of UM in 16 biopsies and 8 subsequent enucleations, and results were correlated with the UM-specific gene expression profile (GEP; <i>n</i> = 11), chromosome 3 status by FISH and/or chromosomal microarray (<i>n</i> = 12; 9 also had GEP), and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UM involved the choroid in 15 (of 16) cases. Biopsy was performed for prognostication (<i>n</i> = 12) or diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 4). Treatment included brachytherapy (<i>n</i> = 13; 5 followed by enucleation) or enucleation only (<i>n</i> = 3). BAP1 nuclear immunostaining was positive in 9, negative in 4, and equivocal in 3 biopsies. For the 3 equivocal biopsies, BAP1 immunostaining was positive in 2 (of 3) subsequent enucleations. BAP1 immunostaining was concordant between all 5 remaining biopsies and enucleations. BAP1-positive biopsies had disomy 3 (<i>n</i> = 6) or 3p loss (<i>n</i> = 1) and class 1 GEP (<i>n</i> = 6). BAP1-negative biopsies had monosomy 3 (<i>n</i> = 3) and class 2 GEP (<i>n</i> = 2). Median follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17-150). For BAP1-positive UM patients, 8 were alive (7 without metastatic disease) and 3 had died (1 melanoma-related death). Among BAP1-negative UM patients, 2 were alive (1 with metastatic disease) and 3 had melanoma-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAP1 immunostaining in biopsies highly correlates with results in subsequent enucleations and with well-established UM prognostic markers, representing a potential additional prognostic tool for UM biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8914242/pdf/oop-0008-0022.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000515858\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000515858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
BAP1 Immunostain Status in Intraocular Biopsy Specimens for Uveal Melanoma Highly Correlates with Other Prognostic Markers.
Introduction: Loss of BAP1 protein expression emerged as a negative prognostic marker in uveal melanoma (UM) and has primarily been studied in enucleations. Intraocular biopsy is frequently performed prior to UM globe-conserving therapy.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated BAP1 immunostaining of UM in 16 biopsies and 8 subsequent enucleations, and results were correlated with the UM-specific gene expression profile (GEP; n = 11), chromosome 3 status by FISH and/or chromosomal microarray (n = 12; 9 also had GEP), and clinical outcomes.
Results: UM involved the choroid in 15 (of 16) cases. Biopsy was performed for prognostication (n = 12) or diagnosis (n = 4). Treatment included brachytherapy (n = 13; 5 followed by enucleation) or enucleation only (n = 3). BAP1 nuclear immunostaining was positive in 9, negative in 4, and equivocal in 3 biopsies. For the 3 equivocal biopsies, BAP1 immunostaining was positive in 2 (of 3) subsequent enucleations. BAP1 immunostaining was concordant between all 5 remaining biopsies and enucleations. BAP1-positive biopsies had disomy 3 (n = 6) or 3p loss (n = 1) and class 1 GEP (n = 6). BAP1-negative biopsies had monosomy 3 (n = 3) and class 2 GEP (n = 2). Median follow-up was 62.5 months (range, 17-150). For BAP1-positive UM patients, 8 were alive (7 without metastatic disease) and 3 had died (1 melanoma-related death). Among BAP1-negative UM patients, 2 were alive (1 with metastatic disease) and 3 had melanoma-related deaths.
Conclusion: BAP1 immunostaining in biopsies highly correlates with results in subsequent enucleations and with well-established UM prognostic markers, representing a potential additional prognostic tool for UM biopsies.