{"title":"表面处理对氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷物理性能和生物膜形成的影响:体外试验。","authors":"Patricia Akemi Nishitani Shibasaki, Vanessa Cavalli, Mateus Cardoso Oliveira, Janaina Priscila Barbosa, Marcelo Fabiano Gomes Boriollo, Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins","doi":"10.11607/ijp.7192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Celtra Duo, ZLS-CD), partially crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Suprinity, ZLS-VS), and partially sintered lithium disilicate-based (IPS e.max CAD, LD) glass-ceramics submitted to polishing, glazing, or no surface treatment after aging.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Samples of each glass-ceramic material were subjected to polishing with rubber cups (POL), glazing (GL), or no treatment (control: unpolished) and afterward aged with 18,000 thermal cycles (5.C to 55.C). The average roughness, 2D and 3D morphology, contact angle, multispecies biofilm formation (Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans), and mechanical strength were evaluated with atomic force microscopy (AFM, n = 5), sessile-drop goniometry (n = 5), spectrophotometry (n = 5), and the flexural strength test (n = 10), respectively. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POL produced lower surface roughness than GL, and ZLS-CD presented higher roughness than LD (P < .05). Surfaces without polishing displayed higher roughness than the POL group (P < .001), greater contact angle (P < .001), and significant morphologic changes, regardless of the glass-ceramic material. Irrespective of the treatment, the contact angle was higher in the ZLS-CD group, and regardless of the material, there was higher biofilm formation and lower flexural strength of the unpolished compared to the POL or GL ceramics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POL promoted lower roughness and minor morphologic surface alterations, but biofilm formation and flexural strength were similar to the GL group. In general, ZLS-CD and ZLS-VS showed more similar behavior than LD, which makes ZLS glass-ceramic a good option for indirect restorations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50292,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","volume":"36 4","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Surface Treatment on the Physical Properties and Biofilm Formation of Zirconia- Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics: In Vitro Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Patricia Akemi Nishitani Shibasaki, Vanessa Cavalli, Mateus Cardoso Oliveira, Janaina Priscila Barbosa, Marcelo Fabiano Gomes Boriollo, Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ijp.7192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Celtra Duo, ZLS-CD), partially crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Suprinity, ZLS-VS), and partially sintered lithium disilicate-based (IPS e.max CAD, LD) glass-ceramics submitted to polishing, glazing, or no surface treatment after aging.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Samples of each glass-ceramic material were subjected to polishing with rubber cups (POL), glazing (GL), or no treatment (control: unpolished) and afterward aged with 18,000 thermal cycles (5.C to 55.C). The average roughness, 2D and 3D morphology, contact angle, multispecies biofilm formation (Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans), and mechanical strength were evaluated with atomic force microscopy (AFM, n = 5), sessile-drop goniometry (n = 5), spectrophotometry (n = 5), and the flexural strength test (n = 10), respectively. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POL produced lower surface roughness than GL, and ZLS-CD presented higher roughness than LD (P < .05). Surfaces without polishing displayed higher roughness than the POL group (P < .001), greater contact angle (P < .001), and significant morphologic changes, regardless of the glass-ceramic material. Irrespective of the treatment, the contact angle was higher in the ZLS-CD group, and regardless of the material, there was higher biofilm formation and lower flexural strength of the unpolished compared to the POL or GL ceramics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>POL promoted lower roughness and minor morphologic surface alterations, but biofilm formation and flexural strength were similar to the GL group. In general, ZLS-CD and ZLS-VS showed more similar behavior than LD, which makes ZLS glass-ceramic a good option for indirect restorations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"460-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of Surface Treatment on the Physical Properties and Biofilm Formation of Zirconia- Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramics: In Vitro Trial.
Purpose: To evaluate the performance of fully crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Celtra Duo, ZLS-CD), partially crystallized zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (Vita Suprinity, ZLS-VS), and partially sintered lithium disilicate-based (IPS e.max CAD, LD) glass-ceramics submitted to polishing, glazing, or no surface treatment after aging.
Material and methods: Samples of each glass-ceramic material were subjected to polishing with rubber cups (POL), glazing (GL), or no treatment (control: unpolished) and afterward aged with 18,000 thermal cycles (5.C to 55.C). The average roughness, 2D and 3D morphology, contact angle, multispecies biofilm formation (Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans), and mechanical strength were evaluated with atomic force microscopy (AFM, n = 5), sessile-drop goniometry (n = 5), spectrophotometry (n = 5), and the flexural strength test (n = 10), respectively. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 5%).
Results: POL produced lower surface roughness than GL, and ZLS-CD presented higher roughness than LD (P < .05). Surfaces without polishing displayed higher roughness than the POL group (P < .001), greater contact angle (P < .001), and significant morphologic changes, regardless of the glass-ceramic material. Irrespective of the treatment, the contact angle was higher in the ZLS-CD group, and regardless of the material, there was higher biofilm formation and lower flexural strength of the unpolished compared to the POL or GL ceramics.
Conclusions: POL promoted lower roughness and minor morphologic surface alterations, but biofilm formation and flexural strength were similar to the GL group. In general, ZLS-CD and ZLS-VS showed more similar behavior than LD, which makes ZLS glass-ceramic a good option for indirect restorations.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO), the International College of Prosthodontists (ICP), the German Society of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials Science (DGPro), and the Italian Academy of Prosthetic Dentistry (AIOP)
Prosthodontics demands a clinical research emphasis on patient- and dentist-mediated concerns in the management of oral rehabilitation needs. It is about making and implementing the best clinical decisions to enhance patients'' quality of life via applied biologic architecture - a role that far exceeds that of traditional prosthetic dentistry, with its emphasis on materials and techniques. The International Journal of Prosthodontics is dedicated to exploring and developing this conceptual shift in the role of today''s prosthodontist, clinician, and educator alike. The editorial board is composed of a distinguished team of leading international scholars.