Jéssica Azevedo Guardalupe, Ivana Duarte Brum, Débora Francisco do Canto, Kelly Cristina Milioni Telles, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, João Lucas Campos de Oliveira
{"title":"护理人员尺寸患者分类系统的比较。","authors":"Jéssica Azevedo Guardalupe, Ivana Duarte Brum, Débora Francisco do Canto, Kelly Cristina Milioni Telles, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, João Lucas Campos de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare nursing staff workload and dimensioning measured by two patient classification systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study, developed in a clinical inpatient unit of a large hospital in southern Brazil, between June and August 2022. Included patients (n = 260) were assessed through two different patient classification systems. The dimensioning calculation provided by the standard and descriptive statistics were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total number of patients, 1,248 classifications were performed with each of the classification systems. One of the instruments showed a concentration of demand for minimal care (54.5%) and the other for intermediate care (63.4%). The anticipation of required nursing hours was discrepant (235.58 and 298.16 hours), as well as the projected nursing staff, which was of 53 and 67 workers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of workload and dimensioning were different when using two patient classification systems in the same sample. Additional accuracy studies shall be carried out.</p>","PeriodicalId":21229,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"57 ","pages":"e20230047"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of patient classification systems for dimensioning nursing staff.\",\"authors\":\"Jéssica Azevedo Guardalupe, Ivana Duarte Brum, Débora Francisco do Canto, Kelly Cristina Milioni Telles, Ana Maria Müller de Magalhães, João Lucas Campos de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare nursing staff workload and dimensioning measured by two patient classification systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional study, developed in a clinical inpatient unit of a large hospital in southern Brazil, between June and August 2022. Included patients (n = 260) were assessed through two different patient classification systems. The dimensioning calculation provided by the standard and descriptive statistics were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the total number of patients, 1,248 classifications were performed with each of the classification systems. One of the instruments showed a concentration of demand for minimal care (54.5%) and the other for intermediate care (63.4%). The anticipation of required nursing hours was discrepant (235.58 and 298.16 hours), as well as the projected nursing staff, which was of 53 and 67 workers, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of workload and dimensioning were different when using two patient classification systems in the same sample. Additional accuracy studies shall be carried out.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"e20230047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10499377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0047en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of patient classification systems for dimensioning nursing staff.
Objective: To compare nursing staff workload and dimensioning measured by two patient classification systems.
Method: Cross-sectional study, developed in a clinical inpatient unit of a large hospital in southern Brazil, between June and August 2022. Included patients (n = 260) were assessed through two different patient classification systems. The dimensioning calculation provided by the standard and descriptive statistics were applied.
Results: Of the total number of patients, 1,248 classifications were performed with each of the classification systems. One of the instruments showed a concentration of demand for minimal care (54.5%) and the other for intermediate care (63.4%). The anticipation of required nursing hours was discrepant (235.58 and 298.16 hours), as well as the projected nursing staff, which was of 53 and 67 workers, respectively.
Conclusion: Measurement of workload and dimensioning were different when using two patient classification systems in the same sample. Additional accuracy studies shall be carried out.
期刊介绍：
The University of São Paulo Nursing School Journal (Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, REEUSP) is a bimonthly periodical revised by fellow nurses, which has the objective of publishing empirical or theoretical articles that represent a significant advance for the professional practice or for the fundaments of Nursing
Mission: to stimulate knowledge production and dissemination in Nursing and related areas, focusing on international interlocution to advance Nursing science.
Areas of Interest: Nursing and Health
Its abbreviated title is Rev Esc Enferm USP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
