Lana Mukharesh, Morgan Ryan, Lystra P Hayden, Suzanne E Dahlberg, Jonathan M Gaffin
{"title":"基于现场评估的肺活量计和便携式数字涡轮肺活量仪的比较:支气管肺发育不良的空气质量、环境和呼吸结果研究。","authors":"Lana Mukharesh, Morgan Ryan, Lystra P Hayden, Suzanne E Dahlberg, Jonathan M Gaffin","doi":"10.1089/ped.2023.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Data on the use of remote spirometry are limited in the pediatric population. We sought to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a digital turbine spirometer, Medical International Research (MIR) Spirobank Smart (MIR, New Berlin, WI, USA), compared with a pneumotachography spirometer, Pneumotrac (Vitalograph Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA), in field-based clinical research. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a cross-sectional study of a subgroup of school-aged participants enrolled in the Air quality, Environment, and Respiratory Outcomes in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) study, who performed same-day paired coached baseline spirometry measurements from the Pneumotrac and MIR devices. Proportion of successful tests was estimated for each device and compared using McNemar's test. Correlation between devices forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and forced vital capacity (FVC) was analyzed by Lin's concordance correlation, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-one participants with history of BPD completed home spirometry maneuvers on both devices. The mean age of participants was 8.7 years. The mean FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC measurement was 81% predicted and 90.4% predicted, respectively. The proportion of acceptable tests appeared higher using Pneumotrac (81%) than when using MIR (67%), although without evidence of discordance (<i>P</i> = 0.317). Among subjects with successful tests on both devices, Lin's concordance correlation demonstrated moderate agreement (FEV<sub>1</sub> <i>r</i> = 0.955, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.98; FVC <i>r</i> = 0.971, CI: 0.91-0.99). The mean difference in FEV<sub>1</sub> between Pneumotrac and MIR was 0.079 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.141 to 0.298 L) and FVC was 0.075 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.171 to 0.322 L). These were relatively small and without evidence of systematic or volume-dependent bias. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Utilizing turbine spirometers may be a promising and feasible way to perform pulmonary function testing for field research in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":54389,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology","volume":"36 3","pages":"115-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pneumotachometer and Portable Digital Turbine Spirometry for Field-Based Assessment: An Air Quality, Environment, and Respiratory Outcomes in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lana Mukharesh, Morgan Ryan, Lystra P Hayden, Suzanne E Dahlberg, Jonathan M Gaffin\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ped.2023.0046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Data on the use of remote spirometry are limited in the pediatric population. We sought to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a digital turbine spirometer, Medical International Research (MIR) Spirobank Smart (MIR, New Berlin, WI, USA), compared with a pneumotachography spirometer, Pneumotrac (Vitalograph Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA), in field-based clinical research. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a cross-sectional study of a subgroup of school-aged participants enrolled in the Air quality, Environment, and Respiratory Outcomes in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) study, who performed same-day paired coached baseline spirometry measurements from the Pneumotrac and MIR devices. Proportion of successful tests was estimated for each device and compared using McNemar's test. Correlation between devices forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and forced vital capacity (FVC) was analyzed by Lin's concordance correlation, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-one participants with history of BPD completed home spirometry maneuvers on both devices. The mean age of participants was 8.7 years. The mean FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC measurement was 81% predicted and 90.4% predicted, respectively. The proportion of acceptable tests appeared higher using Pneumotrac (81%) than when using MIR (67%), although without evidence of discordance (<i>P</i> = 0.317). Among subjects with successful tests on both devices, Lin's concordance correlation demonstrated moderate agreement (FEV<sub>1</sub> <i>r</i> = 0.955, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.98; FVC <i>r</i> = 0.971, CI: 0.91-0.99). The mean difference in FEV<sub>1</sub> between Pneumotrac and MIR was 0.079 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.141 to 0.298 L) and FVC was 0.075 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.171 to 0.322 L). These were relatively small and without evidence of systematic or volume-dependent bias. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Utilizing turbine spirometers may be a promising and feasible way to perform pulmonary function testing for field research in children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"115-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10516228/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2023.0046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Allergy Immunology and Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ped.2023.0046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Pneumotachometer and Portable Digital Turbine Spirometry for Field-Based Assessment: An Air Quality, Environment, and Respiratory Outcomes in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Study.
Introduction: Data on the use of remote spirometry are limited in the pediatric population. We sought to assess the feasibility and accuracy of a digital turbine spirometer, Medical International Research (MIR) Spirobank Smart (MIR, New Berlin, WI, USA), compared with a pneumotachography spirometer, Pneumotrac (Vitalograph Inc., Lenexa, KS, USA), in field-based clinical research. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of a subgroup of school-aged participants enrolled in the Air quality, Environment, and Respiratory Outcomes in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) study, who performed same-day paired coached baseline spirometry measurements from the Pneumotrac and MIR devices. Proportion of successful tests was estimated for each device and compared using McNemar's test. Correlation between devices forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) was analyzed by Lin's concordance correlation, and Bland-Altman plots were generated. Results: Twenty-one participants with history of BPD completed home spirometry maneuvers on both devices. The mean age of participants was 8.7 years. The mean FEV1 and FVC measurement was 81% predicted and 90.4% predicted, respectively. The proportion of acceptable tests appeared higher using Pneumotrac (81%) than when using MIR (67%), although without evidence of discordance (P = 0.317). Among subjects with successful tests on both devices, Lin's concordance correlation demonstrated moderate agreement (FEV1r = 0.955, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.98; FVC r = 0.971, CI: 0.91-0.99). The mean difference in FEV1 between Pneumotrac and MIR was 0.079 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.141 to 0.298 L) and FVC was 0.075 L (95% limits of agreement were -0.171 to 0.322 L). These were relatively small and without evidence of systematic or volume-dependent bias. Conclusions: Utilizing turbine spirometers may be a promising and feasible way to perform pulmonary function testing for field research in children.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology is a peer-reviewed journal designed to promote understanding and advance the treatment of respiratory, allergic, and immunologic diseases in children. The Journal delivers original translational, clinical, and epidemiologic research on the most common chronic illnesses of children—asthma and allergies—as well as many less common and rare diseases. It emphasizes the developmental implications of the morphological, physiological, pharmacological, and sociological components of these problems, as well as the impact of disease processes on families.
Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonology coverage includes:
-Functional and genetic immune deficiencies-
Interstitial lung diseases-
Both common and rare respiratory, allergic, and immunologic diseases-
Patient care-
Patient education research-
Public health policy-
International health studies