斯洛文尼亚版心脏抑郁量表的心理测量特性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Zdravstveno Varstvo Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/sjph-2023-0003
Anja Kokalj Palandačič, Saša Ucman, Mitja Lainščak, Brigita Novak Šarotar
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚版心脏抑郁量表的心理测量特性。","authors":"Anja Kokalj Palandačič,&nbsp;Saša Ucman,&nbsp;Mitja Lainščak,&nbsp;Brigita Novak Šarotar","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the Cardiac Depression Scale into the Slovenian language and test its validity and reliability on Slovenian patients with heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 272 patients with heart disease who underwent elective coronary angiography at Celje General Hospital participated in this study. We used the Slovenian Cardiac Depression Scale (S-CDS), the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-20 (CES-D) to collect data. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.92 and the test-retest reliability was 0.71. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed six factors, accounting for 61% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two- and one-factor solution had acceptable goodness-of-fit measures. However, we kept a more parsimonious one-factor method, given a high correlation between the two factors and the theoretical background in previous studies. Concurrent validation against the CES-D and the STAI-S showed moderate to strong correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The S-CDS is a reliable and valid instrument for screening for depression in Slovenian patients with heart disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/ac/sjph-62-013.PMC9837811.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Slovenian Version of the Cardiac Depression Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Anja Kokalj Palandačič,&nbsp;Saša Ucman,&nbsp;Mitja Lainščak,&nbsp;Brigita Novak Šarotar\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sjph-2023-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the Cardiac Depression Scale into the Slovenian language and test its validity and reliability on Slovenian patients with heart disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 272 patients with heart disease who underwent elective coronary angiography at Celje General Hospital participated in this study. We used the Slovenian Cardiac Depression Scale (S-CDS), the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-20 (CES-D) to collect data. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.92 and the test-retest reliability was 0.71. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed six factors, accounting for 61% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two- and one-factor solution had acceptable goodness-of-fit measures. However, we kept a more parsimonious one-factor method, given a high correlation between the two factors and the theoretical background in previous studies. Concurrent validation against the CES-D and the STAI-S showed moderate to strong correlations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The S-CDS is a reliable and valid instrument for screening for depression in Slovenian patients with heart disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/ac/sjph-62-013.PMC9837811.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zdravstveno Varstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:本研究的目的是将心脏抑郁量表翻译成斯洛文尼亚语,并测试其在斯洛文尼亚心脏病患者中的效度和信度。方法:在Celje总医院接受选择性冠状动脉造影的272例心脏病患者参与了这项研究。我们使用斯洛文尼亚心脏抑郁量表(S-CDS)、斯皮尔伯格状态焦虑量表(STAI-S)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表-20 (CES-D)收集数据。进行了探索性和验证性因素分析、内部一致性、重测信度和并发效度。结果:总量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.92,重测信度为0.71。探索性因子分析证实了6个因素,占总方差的61%。验证性因子分析表明,两因素和一因素的解决方案具有可接受的拟合优度措施。但是,考虑到两个因素之间的高度相关性以及以往研究的理论背景,我们保留了更为简洁的单因素方法。对CES-D和STAI-S的并发验证显示出中等到强的相关性。结论:S-CDS是斯洛文尼亚心脏病患者抑郁筛查的一种可靠有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of the Slovenian Version of the Cardiac Depression Scale.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to translate the Cardiac Depression Scale into the Slovenian language and test its validity and reliability on Slovenian patients with heart disease.

Methods: A total of 272 patients with heart disease who underwent elective coronary angiography at Celje General Hospital participated in this study. We used the Slovenian Cardiac Depression Scale (S-CDS), the Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-20 (CES-D) to collect data. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were performed.

Results: Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.92 and the test-retest reliability was 0.71. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed six factors, accounting for 61% of the total variance. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a two- and one-factor solution had acceptable goodness-of-fit measures. However, we kept a more parsimonious one-factor method, given a high correlation between the two factors and the theoretical background in previous studies. Concurrent validation against the CES-D and the STAI-S showed moderate to strong correlations.

Conclusions: The S-CDS is a reliable and valid instrument for screening for depression in Slovenian patients with heart disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monitoring the Effect of Vaccination on Mumps Cases Complications in the Czech Republic - Surveillance Data 2013-2022. Smokers' Characteristics Associated with Successful Smoking Cessation Undergoing Pharmacotherapy in Slovenia. Stigmatising Attitudes Towards Mental Health Conditions Among Medical Students In Five South-Eastern European Countries. The Evolution and Challenges of Academic Family Medicine: Insights from the Banja Luka Declaration. The Results of the "My Challenge" Camp in Addressing Childhood Obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1