阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者舌根活动的驱动力与压力贡献。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Annals of the American Thoracic Society Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC
Laura K Gell, Daniel Vena, Kevin Grace, Ali Azarbarzin, Ludovico Messineo, Lauren B Hess, Nicole Calianese, Gonzalo Labarca, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro, David P White, Andrew Wellman, Scott A Sands
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者舌根活动的驱动力与压力贡献。","authors":"Laura K Gell, Daniel Vena, Kevin Grace, Ali Azarbarzin, Ludovico Messineo, Lauren B Hess, Nicole Calianese, Gonzalo Labarca, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro, David P White, Andrew Wellman, Scott A Sands","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. <b>Objectives:</b> For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. <b>Methods:</b> We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). <b>Results:</b> Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model <i>R</i> = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub>; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (<i>n</i> = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub> > 2:1), and one-quarter (<i>n</i> = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub> < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %<sub>baseline</sub>/standard deviation of β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub>; <i>P</i> = 0.004, adjusted analysis). <b>Conclusions:</b> Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8018,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":"20 9","pages":"1326-1336"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drive versus Pressure Contributions to Genioglossus Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.\",\"authors\":\"Laura K Gell, Daniel Vena, Kevin Grace, Ali Azarbarzin, Ludovico Messineo, Lauren B Hess, Nicole Calianese, Gonzalo Labarca, Luigi Taranto-Montemurro, David P White, Andrew Wellman, Scott A Sands\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. <b>Objectives:</b> For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. <b>Methods:</b> We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). <b>Results:</b> Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model <i>R</i> = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub>; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (<i>n</i> = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub> > 2:1), and one-quarter (<i>n</i> = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub> < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %<sub>baseline</sub>/standard deviation of β<sub>drive</sub>:β<sub>pressure</sub>; <i>P</i> = 0.004, adjusted analysis). <b>Conclusions:</b> Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"1326-1336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10502881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-083OC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由咽部扩张肌活动丧失是阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)呼吸事件的关键决定因素。在睡眠开始时对舌根部的清醒刺激消失后,机械感受器负压和化学感受器通气驱动反馈控制着睡眠期间舌根部的激活,但在渐进性阻塞事件中,驱动和压力刺激对舌根部活动的相对贡献仍不清楚。我们最近的研究表明,在发生阻塞事件时,驱动力通常会下降,而负压则会上升,这为评估它们对舌根活动时间进程的各自贡献提供了一种方法。我们的目标是我们首次严格检验了驱动力的丧失是否可以解释在 OSA 事件中观察到的舌根活动的丧失。方法:我们研究了 42 名 OSA 患者(呼吸暂停-低通气指数为 5-91 事件/小时)自发呼吸事件期间舌根肌活动(EMGgg;肌内肌电图)、通气驱动力(食道内横膈膜肌电图)和食道压力的时间过程(使用集合平均法)。结果显示多变量回归表明,先下降后上升的驱动力和上升的负压刺激可以很好地解释 EMGgg 先下降后上升的时间过程(模型 R = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% 置信区间])。总体而言,EMGgg 与驱动力的关系比与压力刺激的关系密切 2.9 倍(0.47-∞)(标准化系数之比,β驱动力:β压力;∞表示无压力贡献)。然而,单个患者的结果不尽相同:约二分之一(42 人中有 22 人)表现出驱动力主导型反应(即 β 驱动力:β 压力 > 2:1),四分之一(42 人中有 11 人)表现出压力主导型 EMGgg 反应(即 β 驱动力:β 压力基线/β 驱动力:β 压力的标准偏差;P = 0.004,调整分析)。结论诱发 OSA 患者事件的舌根肌活动丧失与同时发生的驱动力丧失密切相关,在那些活动追踪驱动力而非压力刺激的患者中,驱动力丧失的程度最大。这些发现在没有事先唤醒的事件中得到了证实。在事件发生时,对下降的驱动力而非上升的负压做出反应可能是有害的;通过优先增强对上升的压力而非下降的驱动力的反应来维持舌根肌活动的未来治疗策略值得关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drive versus Pressure Contributions to Genioglossus Activity in Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Rationale: Loss of pharyngeal dilator muscle activity is a key determinant of respiratory events in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). After the withdrawal of wakefulness stimuli to the genioglossus at sleep onset, mechanoreceptor negative pressure and chemoreceptor ventilatory drive feedback govern genioglossus activation during sleep, but the relative contributions of drive and pressure stimuli to genioglossus activity across progressive obstructive events remain unclear. We recently showed that drive typically falls during events, whereas negative pressures increase, providing a means to assess their individual contributions to the time course of genioglossus activity. Objectives: For the first time, we critically test whether the loss of drive could explain the loss of genioglossus activity observed within events in OSA. Methods: We examined the time course of genioglossus activity (EMGgg; intramuscular electromyography), ventilatory drive (intraesophageal diaphragm electromyography), and esophageal pressure during spontaneous respiratory events (using the ensemble-average method) in 42 patients with OSA (apnea-hypopnea index 5-91 events/h). Results: Multivariable regression demonstrated that the falling-then-rising time course of EMGgg may be well explained by falling-then-rising drive and rising negative pressure stimuli (model R = 0.91 [0.88-0.98] [95% confidence interval]). Overall, EMGgg was 2.9-fold (0.47-∞) more closely associated with drive than pressure stimuli (ratio of standardized coefficients, βdrivepressure; ∞ denotes absent pressure contribution). However, individual patient results were heterogeneous: approximately one-half (n = 22 of 42) exhibited drive-dominant responses (i.e., βdrivepressure > 2:1), and one-quarter (n = 11 of 42) exhibited pressure-dominant EMGgg responses (i.e., βdrivepressure < 1:2). Patients exhibiting more drive-dominant EMGgg responses experienced greater event-related EMGgg declines (12.9 [4.8-21.0] %baseline/standard deviation of βdrivepressure; P = 0.004, adjusted analysis). Conclusions: Loss of genioglossus activity precipitating events in patients with OSA is strongly associated with a contemporaneous loss of drive and is greatest in those whose activity tracks drive rather than pressure stimuli. These findings were upheld for events without prior arousal. Responding to falling drive rather than rising negative pressure during events may be deleterious; future therapeutic strategies whose aim is to sustain genioglossus activity by preferentially enhancing responses to rising pressure rather than falling drive are of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Annals of the American Thoracic Society Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Annals of the American Thoracic Society (AnnalsATS) is the official international online journal of the American Thoracic Society. Formerly known as PATS, it provides comprehensive and authoritative coverage of a wide range of topics in adult and pediatric pulmonary medicine, respiratory sleep medicine, and adult medical critical care. As a leading journal in its field, AnnalsATS offers up-to-date and reliable information that is directly applicable to clinical practice. It serves as a valuable resource for clinical specialists, supporting their formative and continuing education. Additionally, the journal is committed to promoting public health by publishing research and articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Discharge Support Provided to Patients Leaving 'Before Medically Advised' from Hospitalization for COPD Exacerbation. Morphological Prediction of CPAP Associated Acute Respiratory Instability. The Impact of Age of Diagnosis in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Rural Residence, Tobacco Use, and Nationwide COPD Prevalence: Analyses from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Further Insight into the Association of Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1