多任务作为俄罗斯儿童青少年活动模式的个人选择:与实验多任务的关系及其有效性。

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology in Russia-State of the Art Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.11621/pir.2022.0208
Galina U Soldatova, Elena I Rasskazova
{"title":"多任务作为俄罗斯儿童青少年活动模式的个人选择:与实验多任务的关系及其有效性。","authors":"Galina U Soldatova,&nbsp;Elena I Rasskazova","doi":"10.11621/pir.2022.0208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A person's ability to solve several tasks simultaneously, or within a limited amount of time, - <i>i.e.</i>, multitasking - is becoming more and more highly valued in society, despite experimental data in cognitive science about the low effectiveness of such activity. But, in the modern world, the term multitasking has become increasingly used in another sense - that is, a personal choice to perform several tasks simultaneously even if a person could do them consecutively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between a personal preference for multitasking, its subjective effectiveness in children and adolescents, and their tendency for and efficacy of multitasking under experimental conditions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One hundred and fifty-seven (157) schoolchildren of different ages participated in the study, which called for responding to four windows on a screen, including texts (SMS) and video images, and reporting on their subjective multitasking and its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of children and adolescents said (the older they were, the more likely) that sometimes, or often, they combine several tasks, and argued that their performance was effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subjective perspective on multitasking and its effectiveness was more likely to be related to multitasking by carrying out several tasks simultaneously, than switching between tasks, and was not related to actual effectiveness when undertaking a variety of activities within a limited time period. In the case of distractions (for instance, incoming messages while undertaking tasks), they might be related to a decrease in effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"15 2","pages":"113-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multitasking as a Personal Choice of the Mode of Activity in Russian Children and Adolescents: Its Relationship to Experimental Multitasking and its Effectiveness.\",\"authors\":\"Galina U Soldatova,&nbsp;Elena I Rasskazova\",\"doi\":\"10.11621/pir.2022.0208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A person's ability to solve several tasks simultaneously, or within a limited amount of time, - <i>i.e.</i>, multitasking - is becoming more and more highly valued in society, despite experimental data in cognitive science about the low effectiveness of such activity. But, in the modern world, the term multitasking has become increasingly used in another sense - that is, a personal choice to perform several tasks simultaneously even if a person could do them consecutively.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between a personal preference for multitasking, its subjective effectiveness in children and adolescents, and their tendency for and efficacy of multitasking under experimental conditions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>One hundred and fifty-seven (157) schoolchildren of different ages participated in the study, which called for responding to four windows on a screen, including texts (SMS) and video images, and reporting on their subjective multitasking and its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of children and adolescents said (the older they were, the more likely) that sometimes, or often, they combine several tasks, and argued that their performance was effective.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The subjective perspective on multitasking and its effectiveness was more likely to be related to multitasking by carrying out several tasks simultaneously, than switching between tasks, and was not related to actual effectiveness when undertaking a variety of activities within a limited time period. In the case of distractions (for instance, incoming messages while undertaking tasks), they might be related to a decrease in effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"113-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一个人同时或在有限的时间内解决多个任务的能力,即多任务处理,在社会上越来越受到重视,尽管认知科学的实验数据表明这种活动的效率很低。但是,在现代社会,“多任务”一词越来越多地用于另一种意义上——即个人选择同时执行几项任务,即使一个人可以连续地完成它们。目的:探讨实验条件下儿童青少年的多任务倾向、多任务主观效能与多任务倾向和多任务效能之间的关系。设计:157名不同年龄的学童参与了这项研究,研究要求他们对屏幕上的四个窗口(包括短信和视频图像)做出反应,并报告他们的主观多任务处理及其效果。结果:大多数儿童和青少年(年龄越大越有可能)说,有时或经常,他们同时做几项任务,并认为他们的表现是有效的。结论:多任务处理及其有效性的主观视角更可能与同时进行多项任务的多任务处理有关,而不是在任务之间切换,而与在有限时间内进行多种活动时的实际有效性无关。在分心的情况下(例如,在执行任务时收到消息),它们可能与效率降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multitasking as a Personal Choice of the Mode of Activity in Russian Children and Adolescents: Its Relationship to Experimental Multitasking and its Effectiveness.

Background: A person's ability to solve several tasks simultaneously, or within a limited amount of time, - i.e., multitasking - is becoming more and more highly valued in society, despite experimental data in cognitive science about the low effectiveness of such activity. But, in the modern world, the term multitasking has become increasingly used in another sense - that is, a personal choice to perform several tasks simultaneously even if a person could do them consecutively.

Objective: The aim of this study was to reveal the relationship between a personal preference for multitasking, its subjective effectiveness in children and adolescents, and their tendency for and efficacy of multitasking under experimental conditions.

Design: One hundred and fifty-seven (157) schoolchildren of different ages participated in the study, which called for responding to four windows on a screen, including texts (SMS) and video images, and reporting on their subjective multitasking and its efficacy.

Results: The majority of children and adolescents said (the older they were, the more likely) that sometimes, or often, they combine several tasks, and argued that their performance was effective.

Conclusion: The subjective perspective on multitasking and its effectiveness was more likely to be related to multitasking by carrying out several tasks simultaneously, than switching between tasks, and was not related to actual effectiveness when undertaking a variety of activities within a limited time period. In the case of distractions (for instance, incoming messages while undertaking tasks), they might be related to a decrease in effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Agentic Self-regulation of Capoeira Athletes of Different Sports Qualifications. "I Am a Football Player and/or a Girl": Psychosemantics of Self-Consciousness among Teenage Female Football Players. Analysis of Eye and Head Tracking Movements During a Puck-Hitting Task in Ice Hockey Players, Compared to Wrestlers and Controls. Assessing Motivational Factors in Young Serbian Athletes: A Validation Study of the Sport Motivation Scale-II. Competitive Anxiety and Mood States in High-Performance Cuban Student Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1