phpt患者骨微结构退化——骨折概率的重要预测因子。

IF 3 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795514221145840

Theodor Eugen Oprea, Carmen Gabriela Barbu, Sorina Carmen Martin, Anca Elena Sarbu, Simona Gabriela Duta, Irina Manuela Nistor, Simona Fica

{"title":"phpt患者骨微结构退化——骨折概率的重要预测因子。","authors":"Theodor Eugen Oprea, Carmen Gabriela Barbu, Sorina Carmen Martin, Anca Elena Sarbu, Simona Gabriela Duta, Irina Manuela Nistor, Simona Fica","doi":"10.1177/11795514221145840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss and trabecular bone score (TBS) alteration, which current guidelines recommend assessing. Considering TBS alongside BMD for a 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) may improve PHPT management.Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study composed of 49 Caucasian females (62 ± 10.6 years, 27.7 ± 0.87 kg/m2) with PHPT and 132 matched control subjects (61.3 ± 10.5 years, 27.5 ± 0.49 kg/m2) evaluated in 3 years. We assessed lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD, T and Z scores (GE Healthcare Lunar Osteodensitometer) and TBS (iNsight 1.8), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip FRAX.Results: Patients with PHPT had statistically lower mean values for lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01), LS T-scores (-2 ± 0.2 vs -1.4 ± 0.1 SD, P = .009), LS Z scores (-0.9 ± 0.19 vs -0.1 ± 0.11 SD, P = .009), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.83 ± 0.01 g/cm2, P = .02), FN T-scores (-1.8 ± 0.13 vs -1.5 ± 0.07 SD, P = .017), FN Z scores (-0.51 ± 0.87 vs -0.1 ± 0.82 SD, P = .006), and TBS (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01) compared with control subjects. 22.4% of patients with PHPT had degraded microarchitecture (TBS < 1.2) vs. 7.6% in control group (χ2 = 0.008). PHPT proved to be a covariate with unique contribution (P = .031) alongside LS BMD (P = .040) in a linear regression model [R 2 = 0.532, F(4,16) = 4.543] for TBS < 1.2. TBS adjustment elevated MOF FRAX both for PHPT (4.35 ± 0.6% vs 5.25% ± 0.73%, P < .001) and control groups (4.5 ± 0.24% vs 4.7% ± 0.26%, P < .001) compared with BMD-bases FRAX, but also increased differently between the 2 study groups (1.1-folds for PHPT patients and 1.04 for control subjects, P = .034).Conclusion: Compared with control, TBS-adjusted FRAX provides significantly higher MOF risk than BMD-based FRAX in PHPT women.","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"16 ","pages":"11795514221145840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/10/10.1177_11795514221145840.PMC9869236.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Degraded Bone Microarchitecture in Women with PHPT-Significant Predictor of Fracture Probability.\",\"authors\":\"Theodor Eugen Oprea, Carmen Gabriela Barbu, Sorina Carmen Martin, Anca Elena Sarbu, Simona Gabriela Duta, Irina Manuela Nistor, Simona Fica\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795514221145840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss and trabecular bone score (TBS) alteration, which current guidelines recommend assessing. Considering TBS alongside BMD for a 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) may improve PHPT management.Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study composed of 49 Caucasian females (62 ± 10.6 years, 27.7 ± 0.87 kg/m2) with PHPT and 132 matched control subjects (61.3 ± 10.5 years, 27.5 ± 0.49 kg/m2) evaluated in 3 years. We assessed lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD, T and Z scores (GE Healthcare Lunar Osteodensitometer) and TBS (iNsight 1.8), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip FRAX.Results: Patients with PHPT had statistically lower mean values for lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01), LS T-scores (-2 ± 0.2 vs -1.4 ± 0.1 SD, P = .009), LS Z scores (-0.9 ± 0.19 vs -0.1 ± 0.11 SD, P = .009), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.83 ± 0.01 g/cm2, P = .02), FN T-scores (-1.8 ± 0.13 vs -1.5 ± 0.07 SD, P = .017), FN Z scores (-0.51 ± 0.87 vs -0.1 ± 0.82 SD, P = .006), and TBS (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm2, P = .01) compared with control subjects. 22.4% of patients with PHPT had degraded microarchitecture (TBS < 1.2) vs. 7.6% in control group (χ2 = 0.008). PHPT proved to be a covariate with unique contribution (P = .031) alongside LS BMD (P = .040) in a linear regression model [R 2 = 0.532, F(4,16) = 4.543] for TBS < 1.2. TBS adjustment elevated MOF FRAX both for PHPT (4.35 ± 0.6% vs 5.25% ± 0.73%, P < .001) and control groups (4.5 ± 0.24% vs 4.7% ± 0.26%, P < .001) compared with BMD-bases FRAX, but also increased differently between the 2 study groups (1.1-folds for PHPT patients and 1.04 for control subjects, P = .034).Conclusion: Compared with control, TBS-adjusted FRAX provides significantly higher MOF risk than BMD-based FRAX in PHPT women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"11795514221145840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/79/10/10.1177_11795514221145840.PMC9869236.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221145840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221145840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(PHPT)患者会经历骨密度(BMD)丢失和骨小梁评分(TBS)改变，目前的指南建议对其进行评估。考虑TBS和BMD一起进行10年骨折风险评估(FRAX)可能会改善PHPT的管理。设计:回顾性横断面研究，由49名患有PHPT的高加索女性(62±10.6岁，27.7±0.87 kg/m2)和132名匹配的对照组(61.3±10.5岁，27.5±0.49 kg/m2)组成，3年内评估。我们评估了腰椎(LS)和股骨颈(FN) BMD、T和Z评分(GE Healthcare月相骨密度计)和TBS (iNsight 1.8)、主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)和髋部FRAX。结果:PHPT患者统计平均值低了腰椎骨矿物质密度(LS BMD)(0.95±0.25 vs 1.01±0.14克/厘米2,P = . 01), LS t指数(2±0.2 vs -1.4±0.1 SD, P = .009), LS Z得分(-0.9±0.19 vs -0.1±0.11 SD, P = .009),股骨颈骨密度(FN BMD)(0.79±0.02 vs 0.83±0.01克/厘米2,P = .02点),FN t指数(-1.8±0.13 vs -1.5±0.07 SD, P = .017), FN Z得分(-0.51±0.87 vs -0.1±0.82 SD, P = .006),和TBS(0.95±0.25 vs 1.01±0.14克/厘米2,P = 0.01)。22.4%的PHPT患者微结构退化(TBS 2 = 0.008)。在线性回归模型(r2 = 0.532, F(4,16) = 4.543)中，PHPT与LS BMD (P = 0.040)一起被证明是具有独特贡献的协变量(P = 0.031)。结论:与对照组相比，经tbs调整的FRAX在PHPT女性中提供的MOF风险明显高于基于bmd的FRAX。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Degraded Bone Microarchitecture in Women with PHPT-Significant Predictor of Fracture Probability.

Introduction: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss and trabecular bone score (TBS) alteration, which current guidelines recommend assessing. Considering TBS alongside BMD for a 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) may improve PHPT management.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study composed of 49 Caucasian females (62 ± 10.6 years, 27.7 ± 0.87 kg/m²) with PHPT and 132 matched control subjects (61.3 ± 10.5 years, 27.5 ± 0.49 kg/m²) evaluated in 3 years. We assessed lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD, T and Z scores (GE Healthcare Lunar Osteodensitometer) and TBS (iNsight 1.8), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip FRAX.

Results: Patients with PHPT had statistically lower mean values for lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm², P = .01), LS T-scores (-2 ± 0.2 vs -1.4 ± 0.1 SD, P = .009), LS Z scores (-0.9 ± 0.19 vs -0.1 ± 0.11 SD, P = .009), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.83 ± 0.01 g/cm², P = .02), FN T-scores (-1.8 ± 0.13 vs -1.5 ± 0.07 SD, P = .017), FN Z scores (-0.51 ± 0.87 vs -0.1 ± 0.82 SD, P = .006), and TBS (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm², P = .01) compared with control subjects. 22.4% of patients with PHPT had degraded microarchitecture (TBS < 1.2) vs. 7.6% in control group (χ² = 0.008). PHPT proved to be a covariate with unique contribution (P = .031) alongside LS BMD (P = .040) in a linear regression model [R ² = 0.532, F(4,16) = 4.543] for TBS < 1.2. TBS adjustment elevated MOF FRAX both for PHPT (4.35 ± 0.6% vs 5.25% ± 0.73%, P < .001) and control groups (4.5 ± 0.24% vs 4.7% ± 0.26%, P < .001) compared with BMD-bases FRAX, but also increased differently between the 2 study groups (1.1-folds for PHPT patients and 1.04 for control subjects, P = .034).