一项随机III期研究,在6个周期的XELOX(卡培他滨加奥沙利铂)后,卡培他滨维持或临床观察无进展的晚期胃腺癌患者。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastric Cancer Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e16
Guk Jin Lee, Hyunho Kim, Sung Shim Cho, Hyung Soon Park, Ho Jung An, In Sook Woo, Jae Ho Byun, Ji Hyung Hong, Yoon Ho Ko, Der Sheng Sun, Hye Sung Won, Jong Youl Jin, Ji Chan Park, In-Ho Kim, Sang Young Roh, Byoung Yong Shim
{"title":"一项随机III期研究,在6个周期的XELOX(卡培他滨加奥沙利铂)后,卡培他滨维持或临床观察无进展的晚期胃腺癌患者。","authors":"Guk Jin Lee,&nbsp;Hyunho Kim,&nbsp;Sung Shim Cho,&nbsp;Hyung Soon Park,&nbsp;Ho Jung An,&nbsp;In Sook Woo,&nbsp;Jae Ho Byun,&nbsp;Ji Hyung Hong,&nbsp;Yoon Ho Ko,&nbsp;Der Sheng Sun,&nbsp;Hye Sung Won,&nbsp;Jong Youl Jin,&nbsp;Ji Chan Park,&nbsp;In-Ho Kim,&nbsp;Sang Young Roh,&nbsp;Byoung Yong Shim","doi":"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oxaliplatin, a component of the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen, has a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, oxaliplatin can induce sensory neuropathy and cumulative, dose-related toxicities. Thus, the capecitabine maintenance regimen may achieve the maximum treatment effect while reducing the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients with advanced GC between capecitabine maintenance and observation after 1st line XELOX chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients treated with six cycles of XELOX for advanced GC in six hospitals of the Catholic University of Korea were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine maintenance or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed using a two-sided log-rank test stratified at a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2020, 32 and 31 patients were randomized into the maintenance and observation groups, respectively. After randomization, the median number of capecitabine maintenance cycles was 6. The PFS was significantly higher in the maintenance group than the observation group (6.3 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.010). Overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (18.2 vs. 16.5 months, P=0.624). Toxicities, such as hand-foot syndrome, were reported in some maintenance group patients. Maintenance treatment was a significant factor associated with PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.472; 95% confidence interval, 0.250-0.890; P=0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 6 cycles of XELOX chemotherapy, capecitabine maintenance significantly prolonged PFS compared with observation, and toxicity was manageable. Maintenance treatment was a significant prognostic factor associated with PFS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289547.</p>","PeriodicalId":56072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","volume":"23 2","pages":"315-327"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/f7/jgc-23-315.PMC10154142.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Phase III Study of Patients With Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Without Progression After Six Cycles of XELOX (Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin) Followed by Capecitabine Maintenance or Clinical Observation.\",\"authors\":\"Guk Jin Lee,&nbsp;Hyunho Kim,&nbsp;Sung Shim Cho,&nbsp;Hyung Soon Park,&nbsp;Ho Jung An,&nbsp;In Sook Woo,&nbsp;Jae Ho Byun,&nbsp;Ji Hyung Hong,&nbsp;Yoon Ho Ko,&nbsp;Der Sheng Sun,&nbsp;Hye Sung Won,&nbsp;Jong Youl Jin,&nbsp;Ji Chan Park,&nbsp;In-Ho Kim,&nbsp;Sang Young Roh,&nbsp;Byoung Yong Shim\",\"doi\":\"10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oxaliplatin, a component of the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen, has a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, oxaliplatin can induce sensory neuropathy and cumulative, dose-related toxicities. Thus, the capecitabine maintenance regimen may achieve the maximum treatment effect while reducing the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients with advanced GC between capecitabine maintenance and observation after 1st line XELOX chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Sixty-three patients treated with six cycles of XELOX for advanced GC in six hospitals of the Catholic University of Korea were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine maintenance or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed using a two-sided log-rank test stratified at a 5% significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2015 and 2020, 32 and 31 patients were randomized into the maintenance and observation groups, respectively. After randomization, the median number of capecitabine maintenance cycles was 6. The PFS was significantly higher in the maintenance group than the observation group (6.3 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.010). Overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (18.2 vs. 16.5 months, P=0.624). Toxicities, such as hand-foot syndrome, were reported in some maintenance group patients. Maintenance treatment was a significant factor associated with PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.472; 95% confidence interval, 0.250-0.890; P=0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 6 cycles of XELOX chemotherapy, capecitabine maintenance significantly prolonged PFS compared with observation, and toxicity was manageable. Maintenance treatment was a significant prognostic factor associated with PFS.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289547.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastric Cancer\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"315-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/f7/jgc-23-315.PMC10154142.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastric Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e16\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastric Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:奥沙利铂是卡培他滨+奥沙利铂(XELOX)方案的一个组成部分,在晚期胃癌(GC)患者中具有比顺铂更有利的毒性。然而,奥沙利铂可诱导感觉神经病变和累积的剂量相关毒性。因此,卡培他滨维持方案可以达到最大的治疗效果,同时降低奥沙利铂的累积神经毒性。本研究旨在比较晚期胃癌患者在一线XELOX化疗后卡培他滨维持和观察的生存率。材料与方法:韩国天主教大学6家医院接受6个周期XELOX治疗晚期GC的患者63例,按1:1随机分为卡培他滨维持组或观察组。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),采用双侧log-rank检验进行分析,显著性水平为5%。结果:2015 - 2020年,32例和31例患者随机分为维持组和观察组。随机化后,卡培他滨维持周期的中位数为6。维持组的PFS显著高于观察组(6.3个月vs 4.1个月,P=0.010)。两组患者总生存期差异无统计学意义(18.2个月vs 16.5个月,P=0.624)。一些维持组患者报告了手足综合征等毒性反应。在多变量分析中,维持治疗是与PFS相关的显著因素(风险比,0.472;95%置信区间为0.250 ~ 0.890;P = 0.020)。结论:XELOX化疗6个周期后,卡培他滨维持较观察显著延长PFS,毒副反应可控。维持治疗是与PFS相关的重要预后因素。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02289547。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Randomized Phase III Study of Patients With Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma Without Progression After Six Cycles of XELOX (Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin) Followed by Capecitabine Maintenance or Clinical Observation.

Purpose: Oxaliplatin, a component of the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) regimen, has a more favorable toxicity profile than cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, oxaliplatin can induce sensory neuropathy and cumulative, dose-related toxicities. Thus, the capecitabine maintenance regimen may achieve the maximum treatment effect while reducing the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin. This study aimed to compare the survival of patients with advanced GC between capecitabine maintenance and observation after 1st line XELOX chemotherapy.

Materials and methods: Sixty-three patients treated with six cycles of XELOX for advanced GC in six hospitals of the Catholic University of Korea were randomized 1:1 to receive capecitabine maintenance or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), analyzed using a two-sided log-rank test stratified at a 5% significance level.

Results: Between 2015 and 2020, 32 and 31 patients were randomized into the maintenance and observation groups, respectively. After randomization, the median number of capecitabine maintenance cycles was 6. The PFS was significantly higher in the maintenance group than the observation group (6.3 vs. 4.1 months, P=0.010). Overall survival was not significantly different between the 2 groups (18.2 vs. 16.5 months, P=0.624). Toxicities, such as hand-foot syndrome, were reported in some maintenance group patients. Maintenance treatment was a significant factor associated with PFS in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.472; 95% confidence interval, 0.250-0.890; P=0.020).

Conclusions: After 6 cycles of XELOX chemotherapy, capecitabine maintenance significantly prolonged PFS compared with observation, and toxicity was manageable. Maintenance treatment was a significant prognostic factor associated with PFS.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02289547.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gastric Cancer
Journal of Gastric Cancer Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastric Cancer (J Gastric Cancer) is an international peer-reviewed journal. Each issue carries high quality clinical and translational researches on gastric neoplasms. Editorial Board of J Gastric Cancer publishes original articles on pathophysiology, molecular oncology, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of gastric cancer as well as articles on dietary control and improving the quality of life for gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer includes case reports, review articles, how I do it articles, editorials, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Association of Soy Foods With Gastric Cancer Considering Helicobacter pylori: A Multi-Center Case-Control Study. Clinical Feasibility of Vascular Navigation System During Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Comparison With Propensity-Score Matching. Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Trop Family Proteins (Trop-2 and EpCAM) in Gastric Carcinoma. Clinicopathologic Features and Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Foveolar-Type Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach. Development and Feasibility Assessment of Mobile Application-Based Digital Therapeutics for Postoperative Supportive Care in Gastric Cancer Patients Following Gastrectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1