紧急医疗服务采血是否能缩短缺血性脑卒中患者使用组织浆细胞酶原激活剂的时间?

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1177/87551225231182543
Abigail L Hulsizer, Sondra Davis, Caitlin M Gibson
{"title":"紧急医疗服务采血是否能缩短缺血性脑卒中患者使用组织浆细胞酶原激活剂的时间?","authors":"Abigail L Hulsizer, Sondra Davis, Caitlin M Gibson","doi":"10.1177/87551225231182543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. To reduce the likelihood of debilitating outcomes, early treatment with fibrinolytics is necessary; however, many struggle to identify strategies that limit time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify if implementing a process for obtaining laboratory blood draws by emergency medical services (EMS) prior to patient arrival at the hospital will reduce the door-to-needle time for patients arriving with acute ischemic stroke. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the door-to-needle time for patients with acute ischemic stroke who had blood drawn via EMS versus in hospital. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at a 433-bed designated Level II Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center community hospital. A comprehensive chart review was done via stroke coordinator binders and electronic medical record. Adult patients ≥18 years of age with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis who met criteria for and received alteplase were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they did not arrive via EMS. The primary end point assessed time to fibrinolytic treatment via door-to-needle times. <b>Results:</b> A total of 66 patients were included with 28 in the EMS laboratory drawn group and 38 in the usual group. Median door-to-needle time was 57.5 ± 19.0 minutes in the EMS group and 55.0 ± 31.9 minutes in the usual care group (<i>p</i> = 0.818). <b>Conclusions:</b> Collection of blood for laboratories by EMS personnel did not significantly shorten door-to-needle time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Emergency Medical Services Blood Collection Shorten Time to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke?\",\"authors\":\"Abigail L Hulsizer, Sondra Davis, Caitlin M Gibson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225231182543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. To reduce the likelihood of debilitating outcomes, early treatment with fibrinolytics is necessary; however, many struggle to identify strategies that limit time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify if implementing a process for obtaining laboratory blood draws by emergency medical services (EMS) prior to patient arrival at the hospital will reduce the door-to-needle time for patients arriving with acute ischemic stroke. <b>Objectives:</b> To compare the door-to-needle time for patients with acute ischemic stroke who had blood drawn via EMS versus in hospital. <b>Methods:</b> This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at a 433-bed designated Level II Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center community hospital. A comprehensive chart review was done via stroke coordinator binders and electronic medical record. Adult patients ≥18 years of age with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis who met criteria for and received alteplase were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they did not arrive via EMS. The primary end point assessed time to fibrinolytic treatment via door-to-needle times. <b>Results:</b> A total of 66 patients were included with 28 in the EMS laboratory drawn group and 38 in the usual group. Median door-to-needle time was 57.5 ± 19.0 minutes in the EMS group and 55.0 ± 31.9 minutes in the usual care group (<i>p</i> = 0.818). <b>Conclusions:</b> Collection of blood for laboratories by EMS personnel did not significantly shorten door-to-needle time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10387817/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231182543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231182543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,缺血性中风是导致长期残疾的主要原因。为了降低导致衰弱的可能性,有必要尽早使用纤溶药物进行治疗;然而,许多人都在努力寻找限制治疗时间的策略。本研究的目的是确定急诊医疗服务(EMS)在患者到达医院之前实施实验室抽血流程是否能缩短急性缺血性中风患者的从门到针的时间。目标:比较急性缺血性脑卒中患者通过急救服务抽血与在医院抽血的 "门到针 "时间。方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究于 2015 年至 2017 年在一家拥有 433 张床位的指定二级创伤中心和综合卒中中心社区医院进行。通过卒中协调员活页夹和电子病历进行了全面的病历审查。研究纳入了年龄≥18 岁、诊断为急性缺血性卒中且符合阿替普酶标准并接受了阿替普酶治疗的成人患者。如果患者不是通过急救服务到达,则排除在外。主要终点是评估通过门到针时间进行纤维蛋白溶解治疗的时间。研究结果研究共纳入了 66 名患者,其中急救中心实验室抽取组有 28 人,普通组有 38 人。急救医疗组的门到针时间中位数为(57.5 ± 19.0)分钟,常规护理组为(55.0 ± 31.9)分钟(P = 0.818)。结论急救人员为实验室采血并不会明显缩短 "门到针 "时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Emergency Medical Services Blood Collection Shorten Time to Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Ischemic Stroke?

Background: Ischemic stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. To reduce the likelihood of debilitating outcomes, early treatment with fibrinolytics is necessary; however, many struggle to identify strategies that limit time to treatment. The purpose of this study is to identify if implementing a process for obtaining laboratory blood draws by emergency medical services (EMS) prior to patient arrival at the hospital will reduce the door-to-needle time for patients arriving with acute ischemic stroke. Objectives: To compare the door-to-needle time for patients with acute ischemic stroke who had blood drawn via EMS versus in hospital. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2015 to 2017 at a 433-bed designated Level II Trauma Center and Comprehensive Stroke Center community hospital. A comprehensive chart review was done via stroke coordinator binders and electronic medical record. Adult patients ≥18 years of age with an acute ischemic stroke diagnosis who met criteria for and received alteplase were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they did not arrive via EMS. The primary end point assessed time to fibrinolytic treatment via door-to-needle times. Results: A total of 66 patients were included with 28 in the EMS laboratory drawn group and 38 in the usual group. Median door-to-needle time was 57.5 ± 19.0 minutes in the EMS group and 55.0 ± 31.9 minutes in the usual care group (p = 0.818). Conclusions: Collection of blood for laboratories by EMS personnel did not significantly shorten door-to-needle time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Apixaban Use in Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease. Phenobarbital Dosing for the Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: A Review of the Literature. Effectiveness of an Aerosol Inhalation Monitor in an Ambulatory Primary Care Pharmacy Clinic Implementation of Virtual Interactive Cases for Pharmacy Education: A Single-Center Experience. The Role of Telepharmacy in the Delivery of Clinical Pharmacy Services Following the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1