参与、发展、学习:一项试点随机临床试验,旨在测试移动应用程序是否能增强家庭对贫困儿童早期认知发展的支持。

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES mHealth Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-22-13
Maureen A Cunningham, Carol Gorman, Monica C McNulty, Catia Chavez, Claudia Luna-Asturias, Cinnamon A Dixon, Sheana Bull, Stephen Berman, Mandy A Allison
{"title":"参与、发展、学习:一项试点随机临床试验,旨在测试移动应用程序是否能增强家庭对贫困儿童早期认知发展的支持。","authors":"Maureen A Cunningham,&nbsp;Carol Gorman,&nbsp;Monica C McNulty,&nbsp;Catia Chavez,&nbsp;Claudia Luna-Asturias,&nbsp;Cinnamon A Dixon,&nbsp;Sheana Bull,&nbsp;Stephen Berman,&nbsp;Mandy A Allison","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-22-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile applications (apps) exist to promote early child development; however, few studies have examined use of these apps among low-income families. Our objectives were to measure engagement with the Engage, Develop, Learn (EDL) app and determine if it promoted engagement and behavior change among low-income caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot study among English and Spanish-speaking, low-income families with children ages 12 to 15 months who received either the EDL app or injury prevention text messages. Baseline data were collected and interventions delivered over two home visits. App engagement was measured using messages opened. Caregiver development-promoting behaviors were measured with STIMQ score changes from baseline to follow-up at child age 2 years. We conducted key informant interviews among families randomized to receive the EDL app to identify barriers and facilitators to app use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 caregivers were recruited at their children's preventive care visit with 50 randomized to receive the EDL app and 50 to receive the injury prevention text messages; however, only 25 in the development app and 34 in the injury prevention group completed both home visits. Follow-up data were collected from 14 in the development app group and 30 in the injury prevention group. Over 10 weeks, 24% (6/25) remained engaged with the development app. STIMQ scores did not differ between groups. Barriers included technical difficulties accessing the app, social stressors, and 'forgetting' to use it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our pilot randomized trial of a child development app suggests that it may not be effective for promoting behavior change among low-income caregivers due to low engagement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This pilot trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02717390).</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"9 ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/9a/mh-09-22-13.PMC9902235.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engage, Develop, Learn: a pilot randomized clinical trial to test if a mobile application can enhance home support for early cognitive development among children living in poverty.\",\"authors\":\"Maureen A Cunningham,&nbsp;Carol Gorman,&nbsp;Monica C McNulty,&nbsp;Catia Chavez,&nbsp;Claudia Luna-Asturias,&nbsp;Cinnamon A Dixon,&nbsp;Sheana Bull,&nbsp;Stephen Berman,&nbsp;Mandy A Allison\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/mhealth-22-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile applications (apps) exist to promote early child development; however, few studies have examined use of these apps among low-income families. Our objectives were to measure engagement with the Engage, Develop, Learn (EDL) app and determine if it promoted engagement and behavior change among low-income caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a pilot study among English and Spanish-speaking, low-income families with children ages 12 to 15 months who received either the EDL app or injury prevention text messages. Baseline data were collected and interventions delivered over two home visits. App engagement was measured using messages opened. Caregiver development-promoting behaviors were measured with STIMQ score changes from baseline to follow-up at child age 2 years. We conducted key informant interviews among families randomized to receive the EDL app to identify barriers and facilitators to app use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 caregivers were recruited at their children's preventive care visit with 50 randomized to receive the EDL app and 50 to receive the injury prevention text messages; however, only 25 in the development app and 34 in the injury prevention group completed both home visits. Follow-up data were collected from 14 in the development app group and 30 in the injury prevention group. Over 10 weeks, 24% (6/25) remained engaged with the development app. STIMQ scores did not differ between groups. Barriers included technical difficulties accessing the app, social stressors, and 'forgetting' to use it.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our pilot randomized trial of a child development app suggests that it may not be effective for promoting behavior change among low-income caregivers due to low engagement.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This pilot trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02717390).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"mHealth\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ca/9a/mh-09-22-13.PMC9902235.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"mHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-22-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-22-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动应用程序(app)的存在是为了促进儿童早期发展;然而,很少有研究调查这些应用程序在低收入家庭中的使用情况。我们的目标是衡量参与、发展、学习(EDL)应用程序的参与度,并确定它是否促进了低收入护理人员的参与度和行为改变。方法:我们在英语和西班牙语低收入家庭中进行了一项试点研究,这些家庭有12至15个月大的孩子,他们收到了EDL应用程序或伤害预防短信。通过两次家访收集基线数据并提供干预措施。应用粘性是通过打开的消息来衡量的。在儿童2岁时,用STIMQ评分从基线到随访的变化来测量照顾者的发展促进行为。我们在随机接受EDL应用程序的家庭中进行了关键信息提供者访谈,以确定应用程序使用的障碍和促进因素。结果:共有100名护理人员在儿童预防保健就诊时被招募,其中50人随机接受EDL应用程序,50人接受伤害预防短信;然而,在开发应用程序组中只有25人完成了两次家访,在伤害预防组中只有34人完成了两次家访。随访数据来自14名开发应用程序组和30名伤害预防组。在10周的时间里,24%(6/25)的人仍然在开发应用程序。STIMQ得分在各组之间没有差异。障碍包括访问应用程序的技术困难、社会压力和“忘记”使用它。结论:我们对儿童发展应用程序的随机试验表明,由于低参与度,它可能无法有效促进低收入照顾者的行为改变。试验注册:该试点试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(ID NCT02717390)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engage, Develop, Learn: a pilot randomized clinical trial to test if a mobile application can enhance home support for early cognitive development among children living in poverty.

Background: Mobile applications (apps) exist to promote early child development; however, few studies have examined use of these apps among low-income families. Our objectives were to measure engagement with the Engage, Develop, Learn (EDL) app and determine if it promoted engagement and behavior change among low-income caregivers.

Methods: We conducted a pilot study among English and Spanish-speaking, low-income families with children ages 12 to 15 months who received either the EDL app or injury prevention text messages. Baseline data were collected and interventions delivered over two home visits. App engagement was measured using messages opened. Caregiver development-promoting behaviors were measured with STIMQ score changes from baseline to follow-up at child age 2 years. We conducted key informant interviews among families randomized to receive the EDL app to identify barriers and facilitators to app use.

Results: A total of 100 caregivers were recruited at their children's preventive care visit with 50 randomized to receive the EDL app and 50 to receive the injury prevention text messages; however, only 25 in the development app and 34 in the injury prevention group completed both home visits. Follow-up data were collected from 14 in the development app group and 30 in the injury prevention group. Over 10 weeks, 24% (6/25) remained engaged with the development app. STIMQ scores did not differ between groups. Barriers included technical difficulties accessing the app, social stressors, and 'forgetting' to use it.

Conclusions: Our pilot randomized trial of a child development app suggests that it may not be effective for promoting behavior change among low-income caregivers due to low engagement.

Trial registration: This pilot trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT02717390).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring online health resources and self-care among irritable bowel syndrome patients: analyzing internet use and AI chatbot interactions. Not just a Barbie in hijab: participant perspectives on culturally tailoring a virtual health assistant for Bangladeshi immigrants in the US promoting colorectal cancer screening. Development, usability, and preliminary efficacy of a virtual reality experience to promote healthy lifestyle behaviors in children: pilot randomized controlled trial. Telehealth adoption for substance use and mental health disorders in Minnesota and North Dakota: a quasi-experimental study. Feasibility and reliability to assess the motor development of infants exposed to gestational COVID-19 using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale remotely.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1