{"title":"反复经颅磁刺激对甲基苯丙胺使用障碍个体的心理影响:系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Zhiming Tang, Zhicheng Zhu, Jisheng Xu","doi":"10.1177/10998004221122522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of rTMS on drug craving, depression, anxiety, sleep, and cognitive function in methamphetamine (MA) dependent individuals.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS interventions for MA-dependent patients were searched through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing Vipers (VIP) and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBLD). The included literature was statistically processed using Revman 5.4, and STATA 16.0 for sensitivity and bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 papers were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed that rTMS was effective in reducing craving scores (SMD = -1.53, 95%CI:-2.08 ∼ -0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), improving depression (SMD = -0.32, 95%CI:-0.58 ∼ -0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and sleep scores (WMD = -1.26, 95%CI:-2.26 ∼ -0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.01), but had no effect on anxiety scores (SMD = -0.42, 95%CI:-0.88 ∼ 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.07); in terms of cognitive function, there were improvements in the international shopping list task (ISL), Groton maze learning task (GML) and continuous paired association learning task (CPAL), except for no effect on the social emotional cognition task (SEC) and two back task (TWOB). Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effects of different intervention period on craving in MA-dependent individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTMS was effective in reducing MA dependent individuals' cravings, alleviating depressive symptoms, improving sleep quality and language learning, collaborative learning and executive skills. Due to the small sample size of this study, a large number of RCTs are needed to validate this.</p>","PeriodicalId":8997,"journal":{"name":"Biological research for nursing","volume":"25 1","pages":"117-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Individuals With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhiming Tang, Zhicheng Zhu, Jisheng Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10998004221122522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of rTMS on drug craving, depression, anxiety, sleep, and cognitive function in methamphetamine (MA) dependent individuals.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS interventions for MA-dependent patients were searched through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing Vipers (VIP) and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBLD). The included literature was statistically processed using Revman 5.4, and STATA 16.0 for sensitivity and bias analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 papers were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed that rTMS was effective in reducing craving scores (SMD = -1.53, 95%CI:-2.08 ∼ -0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), improving depression (SMD = -0.32, 95%CI:-0.58 ∼ -0.07, <i>p</i> = 0.01) and sleep scores (WMD = -1.26, 95%CI:-2.26 ∼ -0.27, <i>p</i> = 0.01), but had no effect on anxiety scores (SMD = -0.42, 95%CI:-0.88 ∼ 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.07); in terms of cognitive function, there were improvements in the international shopping list task (ISL), Groton maze learning task (GML) and continuous paired association learning task (CPAL), except for no effect on the social emotional cognition task (SEC) and two back task (TWOB). Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effects of different intervention period on craving in MA-dependent individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTMS was effective in reducing MA dependent individuals' cravings, alleviating depressive symptoms, improving sleep quality and language learning, collaborative learning and executive skills. Due to the small sample size of this study, a large number of RCTs are needed to validate this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"117-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological research for nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221122522\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological research for nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10998004221122522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:评价rTMS对甲基苯丙胺依赖者药物渴望、抑郁、焦虑、睡眠和认知功能的影响。数据来源和方法:通过PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库、重庆Vipers (VIP)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBLD)检索rTMS干预ma依赖患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。纳入的文献采用Revman 5.4进行统计学处理,采用STATA 16.0进行敏感性和偏倚分析。结果:共纳入13篇论文,荟萃分析结果显示,rTMS在降低渴望得分(SMD = -1.53, 95%CI:-2.08 ~ -0.98, p < 0.00001)、改善抑郁得分(SMD = -0.32, 95%CI:-0.58 ~ -0.07, p = 0.01)和睡眠得分(WMD = -1.26, 95%CI:-2.26 ~ -0.27, p = 0.01)方面有效,但对焦虑得分(SMD = -0.42, 95%CI:-0.88 ~ 0.03, p = 0.07)没有影响;在认知功能方面,国际购物清单任务(ISL)、格罗顿迷宫学习任务(GML)和连续配对联想学习任务(CPAL)均有改善,但对社会情绪认知任务(SEC)和双背任务(TWOB)无影响。亚组分析显示,不同干预期对ma依赖个体渴望的影响有显著差异。结论:rTMS能有效减少MA依赖个体的渴望,缓解抑郁症状,改善睡眠质量和语言学习、协作学习和执行能力。由于本研究样本量较小,需要大量的rct来验证。
Psychological Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Individuals With Methamphetamine Use Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Objective: To evaluate the effects of rTMS on drug craving, depression, anxiety, sleep, and cognitive function in methamphetamine (MA) dependent individuals.
Data sources and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rTMS interventions for MA-dependent patients were searched through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Chongqing Vipers (VIP) and China Biomedical Literature Database (CBLD). The included literature was statistically processed using Revman 5.4, and STATA 16.0 for sensitivity and bias analysis.
Results: A total of 13 papers were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed that rTMS was effective in reducing craving scores (SMD = -1.53, 95%CI:-2.08 ∼ -0.98, p < 0.00001), improving depression (SMD = -0.32, 95%CI:-0.58 ∼ -0.07, p = 0.01) and sleep scores (WMD = -1.26, 95%CI:-2.26 ∼ -0.27, p = 0.01), but had no effect on anxiety scores (SMD = -0.42, 95%CI:-0.88 ∼ 0.03, p = 0.07); in terms of cognitive function, there were improvements in the international shopping list task (ISL), Groton maze learning task (GML) and continuous paired association learning task (CPAL), except for no effect on the social emotional cognition task (SEC) and two back task (TWOB). Subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the effects of different intervention period on craving in MA-dependent individuals.
Conclusion: rTMS was effective in reducing MA dependent individuals' cravings, alleviating depressive symptoms, improving sleep quality and language learning, collaborative learning and executive skills. Due to the small sample size of this study, a large number of RCTs are needed to validate this.
期刊介绍:
Biological Research For Nursing (BRN) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that helps nurse researchers, educators, and practitioners integrate information from many basic disciplines; biology, physiology, chemistry, health policy, business, engineering, education, communication and the social sciences into nursing research, theory and clinical practice. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)