护理教师:应对大流行。

Q3 Social Sciences Journal of Applied Social Science Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1177/19367244221142757
Debra Marshall, Sara Hoskin
{"title":"护理教师:应对大流行。","authors":"Debra Marshall,&nbsp;Sara Hoskin","doi":"10.1177/19367244221142757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myriad research examines benefits and drawbacks of working from home, both pre- and post-pandemic. Our research looks at how work from home mandates due to the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented, primarily by those who also had caregiver roles to fulfill. We used a convenience sample, drawing from full-time college faculty at a mid-sized state college in Florida, gathering information from caregivers and non-caregivers for comparative purposes. As we analyzed our data, we considered two additional concepts: Elmore's backward mapping, which asks us to consider how employer mandates are implemented and will assist us in making policy recommendations, and Smith's Standpoint, which allowed us to consider our own different gendered experiences as we analyzed survey responses. Our findings reveal that there are some employees well suited to working from home, while others are less enthusiastic about this initiative, and that a significant factor is household caregiving responsibilities, often considered to be the domain of women. Our insights shed light on differences in caregiver-employee statuses; we hope to help guide effective institutional policy should there be a need for workplaces to shut down again and to encourage administrators to consider faculty who may be a good work from home fit should it be considered for everyday work. Understanding where the strengths and weaknesses were/are for workers who work from home will benefit employers.</p>","PeriodicalId":39829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Science","volume":"17 1","pages":"37-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899694/pdf/10.1177_19367244221142757.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caregiver Faculty: Working through a Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Debra Marshall,&nbsp;Sara Hoskin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19367244221142757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Myriad research examines benefits and drawbacks of working from home, both pre- and post-pandemic. Our research looks at how work from home mandates due to the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented, primarily by those who also had caregiver roles to fulfill. We used a convenience sample, drawing from full-time college faculty at a mid-sized state college in Florida, gathering information from caregivers and non-caregivers for comparative purposes. As we analyzed our data, we considered two additional concepts: Elmore's backward mapping, which asks us to consider how employer mandates are implemented and will assist us in making policy recommendations, and Smith's Standpoint, which allowed us to consider our own different gendered experiences as we analyzed survey responses. Our findings reveal that there are some employees well suited to working from home, while others are less enthusiastic about this initiative, and that a significant factor is household caregiving responsibilities, often considered to be the domain of women. Our insights shed light on differences in caregiver-employee statuses; we hope to help guide effective institutional policy should there be a need for workplaces to shut down again and to encourage administrators to consider faculty who may be a good work from home fit should it be considered for everyday work. Understanding where the strengths and weaknesses were/are for workers who work from home will benefit employers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Social Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"37-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9899694/pdf/10.1177_19367244221142757.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244221142757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244221142757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无数的研究调查了在大流行之前和之后在家工作的利弊。我们的研究着眼于2019冠状病毒病大流行导致的在家工作任务是如何实施的,主要是那些也有照顾者角色需要履行的人。我们使用了一个方便的样本,从佛罗里达州一所中等规模的州立大学的全日制大学教师中抽取,从护理人员和非护理人员中收集信息以进行比较。在分析我们的数据时,我们考虑了另外两个概念:埃尔莫尔的反向映射,它要求我们考虑雇主的命令是如何实施的,这将有助于我们制定政策建议;史密斯的立场,它允许我们在分析调查回应时考虑我们自己不同的性别经验。我们的研究结果显示,有些员工非常适合在家工作,而另一些人则对这一举措不太感兴趣,其中一个重要因素是照顾家庭的责任,这通常被认为是女性的领域。我们的见解揭示了照顾者-雇员状态的差异;如果有必要再次关闭工作场所,我们希望能帮助指导有效的制度政策,并鼓励管理人员考虑那些可能适合在家工作的教员,如果考虑日常工作的话。了解在家工作的员工的优点和缺点将使雇主受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caregiver Faculty: Working through a Pandemic.

Myriad research examines benefits and drawbacks of working from home, both pre- and post-pandemic. Our research looks at how work from home mandates due to the COVID-19 pandemic were implemented, primarily by those who also had caregiver roles to fulfill. We used a convenience sample, drawing from full-time college faculty at a mid-sized state college in Florida, gathering information from caregivers and non-caregivers for comparative purposes. As we analyzed our data, we considered two additional concepts: Elmore's backward mapping, which asks us to consider how employer mandates are implemented and will assist us in making policy recommendations, and Smith's Standpoint, which allowed us to consider our own different gendered experiences as we analyzed survey responses. Our findings reveal that there are some employees well suited to working from home, while others are less enthusiastic about this initiative, and that a significant factor is household caregiving responsibilities, often considered to be the domain of women. Our insights shed light on differences in caregiver-employee statuses; we hope to help guide effective institutional policy should there be a need for workplaces to shut down again and to encourage administrators to consider faculty who may be a good work from home fit should it be considered for everyday work. Understanding where the strengths and weaknesses were/are for workers who work from home will benefit employers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Social Science
Journal of Applied Social Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Social Science publishes research articles, essays, research reports, teaching notes, and book reviews on a wide range of topics of interest to the social science practitioner. Specifically, we encourage submission of manuscripts that, in a concrete way, apply social science or critically reflect on the application of social science. Authors must address how they either improved a social condition or propose to do so, based on social science research.
期刊最新文献
“Don’t Really Figure Wages . . . Just Pay Bills”: Family Home Child Care Providers as Small Business Owners Considering Contextual Influences on Fatherhood Program Participants’ Experiences Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close: Creating Connection in Divisive Times Categorization of Health Insurance Coverage Type from Survey Questions after Health Reform: The Case of the Current Population Survey Peer-Led Groups in Sexual Assault Prevention Programming: Myth Adherence and Self-Defense Efficacy within Gender and Race
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1