在门诊环境中照顾有显著智力残疾水平的成年人:一项全国医生调查的结果。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1352/1944-7558-128.1.36
Eric G Campbell, Sowmya R Rao, Julie Ressalam, Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic, Rosa Lawrence, Jaime M Moore, Lisa I Iezzoni
{"title":"在门诊环境中照顾有显著智力残疾水平的成年人:一项全国医生调查的结果。","authors":"Eric G Campbell,&nbsp;Sowmya R Rao,&nbsp;Julie Ressalam,&nbsp;Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic,&nbsp;Rosa Lawrence,&nbsp;Jaime M Moore,&nbsp;Lisa I Iezzoni","doi":"10.1352/1944-7558-128.1.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Between 1% and 2% of the U.S. population has an intellectual disability (ID) and often experience disparities in health care. Communication patterns and sedation use for routine medical procedures are important aspects of care for this population. We explored physicians' communication patterns and sedation use in caring for patients with significant levels of ID through a mailed survey of 1,400 physicians among seven specialties in outpatient settings (response rate = 61.0%). Among physicians who saw at least one patient with significant levels of ID in an average month, 74.8% reported usually/always communicating primarily with someone other than the patient. Among specialists, 85.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-90.5%) reported doing so, compared to 69.9% (95% CI: 64.4%-75.4%) for primary care physicians (p < 0.001). Also, 11.4% reported sedating at least one patient with significant levels of ID for a routine procedure. Three quarters of physicians reported communicating primarily with persons other than the patient usually or always-an approach that, in some instances, may not align with best medical practice. The percentage of physicians who report sedating at least one individual is associated with significant ID and the physician's volume of patients with significant ID.</p>","PeriodicalId":51508,"journal":{"name":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"128 1","pages":"36-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caring for Adults With Significant Levels of Intellectual Disability in Outpatient Settings: Results of a National Survey of Physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Eric G Campbell,&nbsp;Sowmya R Rao,&nbsp;Julie Ressalam,&nbsp;Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic,&nbsp;Rosa Lawrence,&nbsp;Jaime M Moore,&nbsp;Lisa I Iezzoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/1944-7558-128.1.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Between 1% and 2% of the U.S. population has an intellectual disability (ID) and often experience disparities in health care. Communication patterns and sedation use for routine medical procedures are important aspects of care for this population. We explored physicians' communication patterns and sedation use in caring for patients with significant levels of ID through a mailed survey of 1,400 physicians among seven specialties in outpatient settings (response rate = 61.0%). Among physicians who saw at least one patient with significant levels of ID in an average month, 74.8% reported usually/always communicating primarily with someone other than the patient. Among specialists, 85.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-90.5%) reported doing so, compared to 69.9% (95% CI: 64.4%-75.4%) for primary care physicians (p < 0.001). Also, 11.4% reported sedating at least one patient with significant levels of ID for a routine procedure. Three quarters of physicians reported communicating primarily with persons other than the patient usually or always-an approach that, in some instances, may not align with best medical practice. The percentage of physicians who report sedating at least one individual is associated with significant ID and the physician's volume of patients with significant ID.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"36-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-128.1.36\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajidd-American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-128.1.36","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国人口中有1%到2%的人患有智力残疾(ID),并且经常在医疗保健方面存在差异。沟通模式和镇静在常规医疗程序中的使用是护理这一人群的重要方面。通过对门诊7个专科的1400名医生的邮寄调查(回复率= 61.0%),我们探讨了医生的沟通模式和镇静在照顾显著水平ID患者中的使用。在平均每月至少见过一名有明显ID水平的病人的医生中,74.8%的医生报告通常/总是主要与病人以外的人交流。在专科医生中,85.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-90.5%)报告这样做,而初级保健医生的这一比例为69.9% (95% CI: 64.4%-75.4%) (p < 0.001)。此外,11.4%的人报告说,在常规手术中至少有一名患者有明显的ID水平。四分之三的医生报告说,他们通常或总是主要与病人以外的人交流——在某些情况下,这种方法可能不符合最佳医疗实践。报告至少有一个人使用镇静剂的医生的百分比与严重的ID和医生认为的严重ID患者的数量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caring for Adults With Significant Levels of Intellectual Disability in Outpatient Settings: Results of a National Survey of Physicians.

Between 1% and 2% of the U.S. population has an intellectual disability (ID) and often experience disparities in health care. Communication patterns and sedation use for routine medical procedures are important aspects of care for this population. We explored physicians' communication patterns and sedation use in caring for patients with significant levels of ID through a mailed survey of 1,400 physicians among seven specialties in outpatient settings (response rate = 61.0%). Among physicians who saw at least one patient with significant levels of ID in an average month, 74.8% reported usually/always communicating primarily with someone other than the patient. Among specialists, 85.5% (95% CI: 80.5%-90.5%) reported doing so, compared to 69.9% (95% CI: 64.4%-75.4%) for primary care physicians (p < 0.001). Also, 11.4% reported sedating at least one patient with significant levels of ID for a routine procedure. Three quarters of physicians reported communicating primarily with persons other than the patient usually or always-an approach that, in some instances, may not align with best medical practice. The percentage of physicians who report sedating at least one individual is associated with significant ID and the physician's volume of patients with significant ID.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (Print ISSN: 1944–7515; Online ISSN: 1944–7558) is published by the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. It is a scientifi c, scholarly, and archival multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions of the highest quality to knowledge of intellectual disabilities, its causes, treatment, and prevention.
期刊最新文献
Examining Sociodemographic Variability in the Amount and Type of Interventions for Children With Autism. Medication Management in Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Psychiatric Pharmacists in Primary Care. Providing Care to People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Medical Education. Resúmenes al Español. Résumés en Français.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1