韩国医科学生在以患者为中心的教育方面的经验和观点。

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-29 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2022.235
Inji Yeom, Kiduk Kim, Junhwan Choi, Dong-Mi Yoo
{"title":"韩国医科学生在以患者为中心的教育方面的经验和观点。","authors":"Inji Yeom, Kiduk Kim, Junhwan Choi, Dong-Mi Yoo","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2022.235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study analyzed the current status of and correlations between Korean medical students' experiences and perspectives surrounding patient-centered medical education (PCME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured PCME questionnaire composed of three categories, understanding patients within social and cultural contexts, understanding patients' individual health contexts through communication, and placement of patients at the center of medical education, was used. The students were stratified into pre-medical (Pre-med), medical (Med), and policlinic (PK) groups because of curriculum differences by grade. The χ2 test was applied to analyze the association between students' experiences with and perspectives on PCME. A Cramer's V of 0.200 was considered a large effect size for any association between experiences with and perspectives on PCME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the respondents, 50.6% answered that they did not know about patient-centered medicine before the survey. With increasing school years went up from Pre-med to PK, fewer students agreed that PCME should be added to pre-clinical medicine curricula (p&lt;0.001), that patients should be in the center throughout medical education (p=0.011), and that patients' personal histories, values, and objectives are important PCME (p=0.001). Students who said they learned PCME for each category were more likely to consider PCME important (Cramer's V was 0.219 and 0.271 for \"with,\" and \"for the patients\" respectively, p&lt;0.001 for \"about/with/for the patients\"). Students in all groups chose clinical practice as the best method for PCME (p=0.021). Med group chose the lectures as the most effective tool to learn about the importance of communication (p&lt;0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students who experienced PCME were likely to perceive PCME as important and it showed that experiences of PCME had positive effects on PCME perceptions. Despite students' preferences for clinical practice as the best method for PCME, PK reported that they did not learn PCME, and regarded PCME as less important compared to students at earlier stages of their medical education. Therefore, more intensive and holistic PCME curricula rather than only clinical practice exposure may be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"34 4","pages":"259-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/a6/kjme-2022-235.PMC9726231.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and perspectives on patient-centered education of medical students in Korea.\",\"authors\":\"Inji Yeom, Kiduk Kim, Junhwan Choi, Dong-Mi Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.3946/kjme.2022.235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study analyzed the current status of and correlations between Korean medical students' experiences and perspectives surrounding patient-centered medical education (PCME).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured PCME questionnaire composed of three categories, understanding patients within social and cultural contexts, understanding patients' individual health contexts through communication, and placement of patients at the center of medical education, was used. The students were stratified into pre-medical (Pre-med), medical (Med), and policlinic (PK) groups because of curriculum differences by grade. The χ2 test was applied to analyze the association between students' experiences with and perspectives on PCME. A Cramer's V of 0.200 was considered a large effect size for any association between experiences with and perspectives on PCME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the respondents, 50.6% answered that they did not know about patient-centered medicine before the survey. With increasing school years went up from Pre-med to PK, fewer students agreed that PCME should be added to pre-clinical medicine curricula (p&lt;0.001), that patients should be in the center throughout medical education (p=0.011), and that patients' personal histories, values, and objectives are important PCME (p=0.001). Students who said they learned PCME for each category were more likely to consider PCME important (Cramer's V was 0.219 and 0.271 for \\\"with,\\\" and \\\"for the patients\\\" respectively, p&lt;0.001 for \\\"about/with/for the patients\\\"). Students in all groups chose clinical practice as the best method for PCME (p=0.021). Med group chose the lectures as the most effective tool to learn about the importance of communication (p&lt;0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students who experienced PCME were likely to perceive PCME as important and it showed that experiences of PCME had positive effects on PCME perceptions. Despite students' preferences for clinical practice as the best method for PCME, PK reported that they did not learn PCME, and regarded PCME as less important compared to students at earlier stages of their medical education. Therefore, more intensive and holistic PCME curricula rather than only clinical practice exposure may be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"259-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/85/a6/kjme-2022-235.PMC9726231.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究分析了韩国医科学生在以患者为中心的医学教育(PCME)方面的经验和观点的现状及相互关系:方法:采用结构化 PCME 调查问卷,问卷包括三个类别,即在社会和文化背景下理解患者、通过沟通理解患者的个人健康状况以及将患者置于医学教育的中心。由于各年级的课程设置不同,学生被分为医学预科(Pre-med)组、医学(Med)组和临床医学(PK)组。采用 χ2 检验分析学生对 PCME 的体验和看法之间的关联。克莱默 V 值为 0.200 被认为是学生对 PCME 的体验和看法之间存在较大关联的效应大小:在受访者中,50.6%的人回答在调查前不了解 "以病人为中心的医疗"。随着学年的增加,从医学预科到PK,同意在临床医学预科课程中增加PCME(p<0.001)、在整个医学教育中以患者为中心(p=0.011)以及患者的个人病史、价值观和目标是重要的PCME(p=0.001)的学生越来越少。自称学到了各类PCME的学生更有可能认为PCME很重要("与患者一起 "和 "为患者 "的Cramer's V分别为0.219和0.271,"关于/与/为患者 "的P<0.001)。各组学生均选择临床实践作为 PCME 的最佳方法(p=0.021)。医学组选择讲座作为学习沟通重要性的最有效工具(p<0.001):有PCME经历的学生可能认为PCME很重要,而且PCME经历对PCME认知有积极影响。尽管学生更倾向于将临床实践作为PCME的最佳方法,但与医学教育早期阶段的学生相比,PK表示他们没有学习过PCME,并认为PCME不那么重要。因此,可能有必要开设更密集、更全面的PCME课程,而不仅仅是接触临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experiences and perspectives on patient-centered education of medical students in Korea.

Purpose: This study analyzed the current status of and correlations between Korean medical students' experiences and perspectives surrounding patient-centered medical education (PCME).

Methods: A structured PCME questionnaire composed of three categories, understanding patients within social and cultural contexts, understanding patients' individual health contexts through communication, and placement of patients at the center of medical education, was used. The students were stratified into pre-medical (Pre-med), medical (Med), and policlinic (PK) groups because of curriculum differences by grade. The χ2 test was applied to analyze the association between students' experiences with and perspectives on PCME. A Cramer's V of 0.200 was considered a large effect size for any association between experiences with and perspectives on PCME.

Results: Among the respondents, 50.6% answered that they did not know about patient-centered medicine before the survey. With increasing school years went up from Pre-med to PK, fewer students agreed that PCME should be added to pre-clinical medicine curricula (p<0.001), that patients should be in the center throughout medical education (p=0.011), and that patients' personal histories, values, and objectives are important PCME (p=0.001). Students who said they learned PCME for each category were more likely to consider PCME important (Cramer's V was 0.219 and 0.271 for "with," and "for the patients" respectively, p<0.001 for "about/with/for the patients"). Students in all groups chose clinical practice as the best method for PCME (p=0.021). Med group chose the lectures as the most effective tool to learn about the importance of communication (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Students who experienced PCME were likely to perceive PCME as important and it showed that experiences of PCME had positive effects on PCME perceptions. Despite students' preferences for clinical practice as the best method for PCME, PK reported that they did not learn PCME, and regarded PCME as less important compared to students at earlier stages of their medical education. Therefore, more intensive and holistic PCME curricula rather than only clinical practice exposure may be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a basic-clinical integrated pharmacology case-based learning program from a student perspective using the CIPP model. "Hey, can I go home?": a qualitative case study of wellbeing and the work environment in surgical training. Behind the scenes: teachers collaboration to facilitate interprofessional education between medical and pharmacy students in Indonesia. Current status and challenges of faculty development in Korean medical education and strategies for advancement. Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1