MOTEMO-OUTDOOR:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过高等教育中的户外和在线环境确保学习和健康安全。

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y
Corel Mateo-Canedo, Neus Crespo-Puig, Ramon Cladellas, Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich, Antoni Sanz
{"title":"MOTEMO-OUTDOOR:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过高等教育中的户外和在线环境确保学习和健康安全。","authors":"Corel Mateo-Canedo, Neus Crespo-Puig, Ramon Cladellas, Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich, Antoni Sanz","doi":"10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The restriction measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic posed notable challenges for formal teaching-learning processes because they had to be adapted to ensure health security. An active learning programme applied to three environments (indoors, outdoors, and online) was tested with 273 undergraduate university students in a within-subjects experimental study. Each student was assigned to two indoor and two outdoor seminars, with a subsample (<i>n</i> = 30) also participating in online seminars implemented in response to the university's lockdown protocols. The learning experience and learning conditions were evaluated through six dimensions: learning, evaluative impact, hedonic experience, technical conditions, environmental conditions, and health security. Outdoor seminars were more effective than indoor seminars in terms of the learning experience, with greater differences in hedonic experience, while the indoor seminars were rated more highly than the outdoor seminars in terms of learning conditions, with a larger difference in the environmental conditions. No differences were found between online and face-to-face environments in terms of the learning experience, even though the online environment yielded better scores in the learning conditions. Apparently, this adaptation to both outdoor and online contexts through active methodologies allows overcoming of technical, environmental, and teaching limitations and improves health security, while ensuring a good learning experience and added flexibility to teaching-learning processes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MOTEMO-OUTDOOR: ensuring learning and health security during the COVID-19 pandemic through outdoor and online environments in higher education.\",\"authors\":\"Corel Mateo-Canedo, Neus Crespo-Puig, Ramon Cladellas, Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich, Antoni Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The restriction measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic posed notable challenges for formal teaching-learning processes because they had to be adapted to ensure health security. An active learning programme applied to three environments (indoors, outdoors, and online) was tested with 273 undergraduate university students in a within-subjects experimental study. Each student was assigned to two indoor and two outdoor seminars, with a subsample (<i>n</i> = 30) also participating in online seminars implemented in response to the university's lockdown protocols. The learning experience and learning conditions were evaluated through six dimensions: learning, evaluative impact, hedonic experience, technical conditions, environmental conditions, and health security. Outdoor seminars were more effective than indoor seminars in terms of the learning experience, with greater differences in hedonic experience, while the indoor seminars were rated more highly than the outdoor seminars in terms of learning conditions, with a larger difference in the environmental conditions. No differences were found between online and face-to-face environments in terms of the learning experience, even though the online environment yielded better scores in the learning conditions. Apparently, this adaptation to both outdoor and online contexts through active methodologies allows overcoming of technical, environmental, and teaching limitations and improves health security, while ensuring a good learning experience and added flexibility to teaching-learning processes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9909139/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的限制措施对正规的教学过程提出了显著的挑战,因为它们必须进行调整以确保健康安全。在一项主体内实验研究中,273 名大学本科生对应用于三种环境(室内、室外和网络)的主动学习计划进行了测试。每个学生被分配到两次室内和两次室外研讨会,其中一个子样本(n = 30)还参加了根据大学封锁协议实施的在线研讨会。学习体验和学习条件通过六个维度进行评估:学习、评价影响、享乐体验、技术条件、环境条件和健康安全。在学习体验方面,室外研讨班比室内研讨班更有效,在享乐体验方面的差异更大;而在学习条件方面,室内研讨班比室外研讨班的评价更高,在环境条件方面的差异更大。在线环境和面对面环境在学习体验方面没有发现差异,尽管在线环境在学习条件方面得分更高。显然,这种通过主动方法适应室外和在线环境的做法可以克服技术、环境和教学方面的限制,提高健康保障,同时确保良好的学习体验,增加教与学过程的灵活性:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MOTEMO-OUTDOOR: ensuring learning and health security during the COVID-19 pandemic through outdoor and online environments in higher education.

The restriction measures put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic posed notable challenges for formal teaching-learning processes because they had to be adapted to ensure health security. An active learning programme applied to three environments (indoors, outdoors, and online) was tested with 273 undergraduate university students in a within-subjects experimental study. Each student was assigned to two indoor and two outdoor seminars, with a subsample (n = 30) also participating in online seminars implemented in response to the university's lockdown protocols. The learning experience and learning conditions were evaluated through six dimensions: learning, evaluative impact, hedonic experience, technical conditions, environmental conditions, and health security. Outdoor seminars were more effective than indoor seminars in terms of the learning experience, with greater differences in hedonic experience, while the indoor seminars were rated more highly than the outdoor seminars in terms of learning conditions, with a larger difference in the environmental conditions. No differences were found between online and face-to-face environments in terms of the learning experience, even though the online environment yielded better scores in the learning conditions. Apparently, this adaptation to both outdoor and online contexts through active methodologies allows overcoming of technical, environmental, and teaching limitations and improves health security, while ensuring a good learning experience and added flexibility to teaching-learning processes.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10984-023-09456-y.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Learning Environments Research publishes original academic papers dealing with the study of learning environments, including theoretical reflections, reports of quantitative and qualitative research, critical and integrative literature reviews and meta-analyses, discussion of methodological issues, reports of the development and validation of assessment instruments, and reviews of books and evaluation instruments.  The scope of the journal deliberately is very broad in terms of both substance and methods. `Learning environment'' refers to the social, physical, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs and which affect student achievement and attitudes. The aim of the journal is to increase our understanding of pre-primary, primary, high school, college and university, and lifelong learning environments irrespective of subject area. Apart from classroom-level and school-level environments, special attention is given to the many out-of-school learning environments such as the home, science centres, and television, etc. The influence of the rapidly developing field of Information Technology with its whole new range of learning environments is an important aspect of the scope of the journal. A wide range of qualitative and quantitative methods for studying learning enviromnents, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, are strongly encouraged. The journal has an affiliation with the American Educational Research Association''s Special Interest Group on the Study of Learning Environments. However, having Regional Editors and an Editorial Board from around the world ensures that LER is a truly international journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of university online teaching and learning delivery approaches and students’ performance during COVID-19 Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) Pedagogical strategies employed in the Emergency Remote Learning Environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The tale of teachers and school ICT coordinators Promoting adolescent subjective well-being: a classroom environment approach Value vs. vulnerability: exploring asynchronous commenting in lecture-capture video recordings for undergraduate medical and dental students and its impact on learning through a pre and post survey design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1