医疗保健行业的员工沉默:为领导和管理开辟新途径。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000349
Anthony Montgomery, Olga Lainidi, Judith Johnson, Jennifer Creese, Fredrik Baathe, Adriana Baban, Anindo Bhattacharjee, Madeline Carter, Lotta Dellve, Eva Doherty, Mimmi Kheddache Jendeby, Karen Morgan, Manjari Srivastava, Neill Thompson, Reidar Tyssen, Veena Vohra
{"title":"医疗保健行业的员工沉默:为领导和管理开辟新途径。","authors":"Anthony Montgomery,&nbsp;Olga Lainidi,&nbsp;Judith Johnson,&nbsp;Jennifer Creese,&nbsp;Fredrik Baathe,&nbsp;Adriana Baban,&nbsp;Anindo Bhattacharjee,&nbsp;Madeline Carter,&nbsp;Lotta Dellve,&nbsp;Eva Doherty,&nbsp;Mimmi Kheddache Jendeby,&nbsp;Karen Morgan,&nbsp;Manjari Srivastava,&nbsp;Neill Thompson,&nbsp;Reidar Tyssen,&nbsp;Veena Vohra","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Issue: </strong>Health care management is faced with a basic conundrum about organizational behavior; why do professionals who are highly dedicated to their work choose to remain silent on critical issues that they recognize as being professionally and organizationally significant? Speaking-up interventions in health care achieve disappointing outcomes because of a professional and organizational culture that is not supportive.</p><p><strong>Critical theoretical analysis: </strong>Our understanding of the different types of employee silence is in its infancy, and more ethnographic and qualitative work is needed to reveal the complex nature of silence in health care. We use the sensemaking theory to elucidate how the difficulties to overcoming silence in health care are interwoven in health care culture.</p><p><strong>Insight/advance: </strong>The relationship between withholding information and patient safety is complex, highlighting the need for differentiated conceptualizations of silence in health care. We present three Critical Challenge points to advance our understanding of silence and its roots by (1) challenging the predominance of psychological safety, (2) explaining how we operationalize sensemaking, and (3) transforming the role of clinical leaders as sensemakers who can recognize and reshape employee silence. These challenges also point to how employee silence can also result in a form of dysfunctional professionalism that supports maladaptive health care structures in practice.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Delineating the contextual factors that prompt employee silence and encourage speaking up among health care workers is crucial to addressing this issue in health care organizations. For clinical leaders, the challenge is to valorize behaviors that enhance adaptive and deep psychological safety among teams and within professions while modeling the sharing of information that leads to improvements in patient safety and quality of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"52-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employee silence in health care: Charting new avenues for leadership and management.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Montgomery,&nbsp;Olga Lainidi,&nbsp;Judith Johnson,&nbsp;Jennifer Creese,&nbsp;Fredrik Baathe,&nbsp;Adriana Baban,&nbsp;Anindo Bhattacharjee,&nbsp;Madeline Carter,&nbsp;Lotta Dellve,&nbsp;Eva Doherty,&nbsp;Mimmi Kheddache Jendeby,&nbsp;Karen Morgan,&nbsp;Manjari Srivastava,&nbsp;Neill Thompson,&nbsp;Reidar Tyssen,&nbsp;Veena Vohra\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Issue: </strong>Health care management is faced with a basic conundrum about organizational behavior; why do professionals who are highly dedicated to their work choose to remain silent on critical issues that they recognize as being professionally and organizationally significant? Speaking-up interventions in health care achieve disappointing outcomes because of a professional and organizational culture that is not supportive.</p><p><strong>Critical theoretical analysis: </strong>Our understanding of the different types of employee silence is in its infancy, and more ethnographic and qualitative work is needed to reveal the complex nature of silence in health care. We use the sensemaking theory to elucidate how the difficulties to overcoming silence in health care are interwoven in health care culture.</p><p><strong>Insight/advance: </strong>The relationship between withholding information and patient safety is complex, highlighting the need for differentiated conceptualizations of silence in health care. We present three Critical Challenge points to advance our understanding of silence and its roots by (1) challenging the predominance of psychological safety, (2) explaining how we operationalize sensemaking, and (3) transforming the role of clinical leaders as sensemakers who can recognize and reshape employee silence. These challenges also point to how employee silence can also result in a form of dysfunctional professionalism that supports maladaptive health care structures in practice.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Delineating the contextual factors that prompt employee silence and encourage speaking up among health care workers is crucial to addressing this issue in health care organizations. For clinical leaders, the challenge is to valorize behaviors that enhance adaptive and deep psychological safety among teams and within professions while modeling the sharing of information that leads to improvements in patient safety and quality of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"52-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000349\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000349","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

问题:卫生保健管理面临着一个关于组织行为的基本难题;为什么那些高度专注于自己工作的专业人士会选择在他们认为对专业和组织意义重大的关键问题上保持沉默?由于专业和组织文化不支持,在卫生保健中直言不讳的干预措施取得了令人失望的结果。批判性理论分析:我们对不同类型的员工沉默的理解尚处于起步阶段,需要更多的民族志和定性工作来揭示卫生保健中沉默的复杂性。我们使用语义理论来阐明在医疗保健中克服沉默的困难是如何在医疗保健文化中相互交织的。洞察/进展:隐瞒信息与患者安全之间的关系是复杂的,突出了医疗保健中沉默的差异化概念的必要性。我们提出了三个关键挑战点,通过(1)挑战心理安全的优势,(2)解释我们如何操作意义构建,(3)将临床领导者的角色转变为能够识别和重塑员工沉默的意义构建者,来推进我们对沉默及其根源的理解。这些挑战还表明,员工的沉默也可能导致一种功能失调的专业精神,从而在实践中支持不适应的医疗保健结构。实践启示:在卫生保健组织中,描述促使员工沉默并鼓励卫生保健工作者直言不讳的背景因素对于解决这一问题至关重要。对于临床领导者来说,挑战是在建立信息共享模型的同时,在团队和专业内部加强适应性和深层心理安全的行为,从而改善患者安全和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Employee silence in health care: Charting new avenues for leadership and management.

Issue: Health care management is faced with a basic conundrum about organizational behavior; why do professionals who are highly dedicated to their work choose to remain silent on critical issues that they recognize as being professionally and organizationally significant? Speaking-up interventions in health care achieve disappointing outcomes because of a professional and organizational culture that is not supportive.

Critical theoretical analysis: Our understanding of the different types of employee silence is in its infancy, and more ethnographic and qualitative work is needed to reveal the complex nature of silence in health care. We use the sensemaking theory to elucidate how the difficulties to overcoming silence in health care are interwoven in health care culture.

Insight/advance: The relationship between withholding information and patient safety is complex, highlighting the need for differentiated conceptualizations of silence in health care. We present three Critical Challenge points to advance our understanding of silence and its roots by (1) challenging the predominance of psychological safety, (2) explaining how we operationalize sensemaking, and (3) transforming the role of clinical leaders as sensemakers who can recognize and reshape employee silence. These challenges also point to how employee silence can also result in a form of dysfunctional professionalism that supports maladaptive health care structures in practice.

Practice implications: Delineating the contextual factors that prompt employee silence and encourage speaking up among health care workers is crucial to addressing this issue in health care organizations. For clinical leaders, the challenge is to valorize behaviors that enhance adaptive and deep psychological safety among teams and within professions while modeling the sharing of information that leads to improvements in patient safety and quality of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Unraveling the chains: Exploring the impact of ownership on administrator turnover in nursing homes. Improving joy at work and reducing burnout in health care workers in Victoria, Australia using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement joy in work framework: A mixed-methods study. What makes proactive behaviors at work effective? Perspectives of health care executives. Guest editorial: Leading with soft skills. Health information technology to advance care in accountable care organizations: Implications for Medicare patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1