评估产科和新生儿紧急情况在线跨专业模拟讲习班。

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES International Journal of Medical Education Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.5116/ijme.6342.9214
Namrata Prasad, Shavi Fernando, Sue Willey, Kym Davey, Jennifer Hocking, Atul Malhotra, Arunaz Kumar
{"title":"评估产科和新生儿紧急情况在线跨专业模拟讲习班。","authors":"Namrata Prasad,&nbsp;Shavi Fernando,&nbsp;Sue Willey,&nbsp;Kym Davey,&nbsp;Jennifer Hocking,&nbsp;Atul Malhotra,&nbsp;Arunaz Kumar","doi":"10.5116/ijme.6342.9214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14029,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Education","volume":"13 ","pages":"287-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911278/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies.\",\"authors\":\"Namrata Prasad,&nbsp;Shavi Fernando,&nbsp;Sue Willey,&nbsp;Kym Davey,&nbsp;Jennifer Hocking,&nbsp;Atul Malhotra,&nbsp;Arunaz Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5116/ijme.6342.9214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"287-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911278/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6342.9214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.6342.9214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:通过基于在线模拟的研讨会,探讨学生对产科和新生儿急诊的学习和跨专业方面的看法。方法:本定性研究在澳大利亚莫纳什大学进行。数据来自2020年5月至2021年8月期间举行的六次独立的在线产科新生儿紧急情况模拟讲习班。共有385名学生参加了这项研究,并被邀请在两到三周后完成一项在线调查。在参与者中,144名学生完成了调查(95名医学学生,45名助产学生),相当于37%的回复率。调查回复从在线调查平台下载,分为医疗回复和助产回复。使用编码框架对数据进行了专题分析,从而制定了主题和分主题。结果:主题为适应性、联系主义、实践准备、体验式学习、建模学习和在线互动动态。学生们报告说,在线研讨会是一种有用的替代方法,可以体验基于模拟的学习,为临床实践做好准备,并培养积极的跨专业关系。与现有评估类似面对面课程的文献一致,助产学学生对专业间互动最感兴趣(主要主题:在线互动的动态),而医科学生更关心发展临床技能(主要主题:通过建模和体验式学习进行学习)。结论:在疫情大流行期间,在偏远地区,在线学习可能是提供跨专业模拟教育的一种有用和方便的方式,并可作为面对面教学的辅助手段。未来的研究应该通过混合方法的研究来评估在线学习的影响,并与面对面的课程进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of online interprofessional simulation workshops for obstetric and neonatal emergencies.

Objectives: To explore student perceptions of learning and interprofessional aspects of obstetric and neonatal emergencies through online simulation-based workshops.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at Monash University, Australia. Data were obtained from six separate online Obstetric Neonatal Emergency Simulation workshops held between May 2020 and August 2021. A total of 385 students attended and were invited to participate in the study by completing an online survey two-three weeks later. Of the attendees, 144 students completed the survey (95 medical, 45 midwifery), equating to a response rate of 37%. Survey responses were downloaded from online survey platform and separated into medical and midwifery responses. Thematic analysis of data was performed using a coding framework, resulting in development of themes and subthemes.

Results: Main themes were adaptability, connectivism, preparedness for practice, experiential learning, learning through modelling and dynamics of online interaction. Students reported that online workshop was a useful alternative method to experience simulation-based learning, increase their readiness for clinical practice and foster positive interprofessional relationships. Consistent with existing literature evaluating similar in-person programs, midwifery students were most interested in interprofessional interaction (predominant theme: dynamics of online interaction), whilst medical students were more concerned with developing clinical skills (predominant themes: learning through modelling, experiential learning).

Conclusions: Online learning may be a useful and convenient way of delivering interprofessional simulation-based education during the pandemic, in remote areas and as an adjunct to in-person teaching. Future studies should evaluate the impact of online learning with a mixed methods study and in comparison, to in-person programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Education
International Journal of Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do mentors perceive and perform their role in a reflection-based mentoring programme for medical students? Enhancing the learning experience by empowering medical students to co-create learning tools and classroom activities. Profiles of intercultural sensitivity of healthcare students: a person-centred approach. Effectively supporting widening participation learners in medical education through a capability approach lens. Exploring a metacognitive approach for case analysis based learning of anxiety adjustment in nurses: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1