Olaf Neumann, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels, Nicole Pfarr, Thomas Albrecht, Katharina Ilm, Jens Christmann, Anna-Lena Volckmar, Hannah Goldschmid, Martina Kirchner, Michael Allgäuer, Maria Walker, Hans Kreipe, Andrea Tannapfel, Wilko Weichert, Peter Schirmacher, Daniel Kazdal, Albrecht Stenzinger
{"title":"基于NGS和基于NGS和fish联合检测肝内胆管癌中FGFR2融合物的首次熟练测试","authors":"Olaf Neumann, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels, Nicole Pfarr, Thomas Albrecht, Katharina Ilm, Jens Christmann, Anna-Lena Volckmar, Hannah Goldschmid, Martina Kirchner, Michael Allgäuer, Maria Walker, Hans Kreipe, Andrea Tannapfel, Wilko Weichert, Peter Schirmacher, Daniel Kazdal, Albrecht Stenzinger","doi":"10.1002/cjp2.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>BICC1</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>DBP</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>TRIM8</i>, and <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>ATE1</i> fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"9 2","pages":"100-107"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.308","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Olaf Neumann, Ulrich Lehmann, Stephan Bartels, Nicole Pfarr, Thomas Albrecht, Katharina Ilm, Jens Christmann, Anna-Lena Volckmar, Hannah Goldschmid, Martina Kirchner, Michael Allgäuer, Maria Walker, Hans Kreipe, Andrea Tannapfel, Wilko Weichert, Peter Schirmacher, Daniel Kazdal, Albrecht Stenzinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence <i>in situ</i> hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for <i>FGFR2</i> fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>BICC1</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>DBP</i>, <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>TRIM8</i>, and <i>FGFR2</i>::<i>ATE1</i> fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of <i>FGFR2</i> gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"100-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pathsocjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjp2.308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First proficiency testing for NGS-based and combined NGS- and FISH-based detection of FGFR2 fusions in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harbours druggable genetic lesions including FGFR2 gene fusions. Reliable and accurate detection of these fusions is becoming a critical component of the molecular work-up, but real-world data on the performance of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and targeted RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) are very limited. Bridging this gap, we report results of the first round robin test for FGFR2 fusions in cholangiocarcinoma and contextualise test data with genomic architecture. A cohort of 10 cholangiocarcinoma (4 fusion positive and 6 fusion negative) was tested by the Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany. Data were validated by four academic pathology departments in Germany. Fusion-positive cases comprised FGFR2::BICC1, FGFR2::DBP, FGFR2::TRIM8, and FGFR2::ATE1 fusions. In a second step, a round robin test involving 21 academic and non-academic centres testing with RNA-based NGS approaches was carried out; five participants performed FISH testing in addition. Thirteen of 16 (81%) centres successfully passed the NGS only and 3 of 5 (60%) centres passed the combined NGS + FISH round robin test. Identified obstacles were bioinformatic pipelines not optimised for the detection of FGFR2 fusions and assays not capable of detecting unknown fusion partners. This study shows the benefit of targeted RNA-NGS for the detection of FGFR2 gene fusions. Due to the marked heterogeneity of the genomic architecture of these fusions, fusion partner agnostic (i.e. open) methodological approaches that are capable of identifying yet unknown fusion partners are superior. Furthermore, we highlight pitfalls in subsequent bioinformatic analysis and limitations of FISH-based tests.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies.
The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.