怀孕期间流感和百日咳疫苗的摄取:通过对孕妇和医疗保健专业人员的多中心问卷研究发现的决定因素。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2021.1987853
Ioannis Tsamandouras, Panagiota Spyromitrou-Xioufi, Michail Matalliotakis, Charoula Matalliotaki, Fani Ladomenou
{"title":"怀孕期间流感和百日咳疫苗的摄取:通过对孕妇和医疗保健专业人员的多中心问卷研究发现的决定因素。","authors":"Ioannis Tsamandouras,&nbsp;Panagiota Spyromitrou-Xioufi,&nbsp;Michail Matalliotakis,&nbsp;Charoula Matalliotaki,&nbsp;Fani Ladomenou","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2021.1987853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this article is to assess the adherence of pregnant women to the national recommendations for influenza and pertussis vaccination and the reasons behind their non-adherence. This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a well-defined puerperant population of adequate healthcare standards from December 2018 to December 2019. The study was carried out with 1006 puerperants and 66 health care practitioners. Data were collected, including demographic-obstetric features of pregnant women, whether they received antenatal vaccination, the reasons for having been vaccinated or not as well as health professional's opinion regarding antenatal immunization. The uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccine during pregnancy was suboptimal with lack of recommendation of the vaccine by the healthcare providers being the main barrier. Factors positively associated with antenatal vaccination against influenza were higher level of maternal education and advanced maternal age while antenatal vaccination against pertussis was positively associated with higher level of maternal education. This large-scale retrospective study reveals the inadequacy of antenatal vaccination rates against pertussis and influenza in Crete, Greece. Results suggest that obstetricians' confidence in vaccination is of outmost importance for implementing immunization in pregnancy and any doubts on vaccine effectiveness and safety should be resolved. Routine antenatal vaccination counseling and pregnancy immunization campaigns are essential to improve vaccine uptake during pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influenza and Pertussis Vaccine Uptake during Pregnancy: Determinants Found through a Multi-Center Questionnaire Study of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Tsamandouras,&nbsp;Panagiota Spyromitrou-Xioufi,&nbsp;Michail Matalliotakis,&nbsp;Charoula Matalliotaki,&nbsp;Fani Ladomenou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08964289.2021.1987853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this article is to assess the adherence of pregnant women to the national recommendations for influenza and pertussis vaccination and the reasons behind their non-adherence. This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a well-defined puerperant population of adequate healthcare standards from December 2018 to December 2019. The study was carried out with 1006 puerperants and 66 health care practitioners. Data were collected, including demographic-obstetric features of pregnant women, whether they received antenatal vaccination, the reasons for having been vaccinated or not as well as health professional's opinion regarding antenatal immunization. The uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccine during pregnancy was suboptimal with lack of recommendation of the vaccine by the healthcare providers being the main barrier. Factors positively associated with antenatal vaccination against influenza were higher level of maternal education and advanced maternal age while antenatal vaccination against pertussis was positively associated with higher level of maternal education. This large-scale retrospective study reveals the inadequacy of antenatal vaccination rates against pertussis and influenza in Crete, Greece. Results suggest that obstetricians' confidence in vaccination is of outmost importance for implementing immunization in pregnancy and any doubts on vaccine effectiveness and safety should be resolved. Routine antenatal vaccination counseling and pregnancy immunization campaigns are essential to improve vaccine uptake during pregnancy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1987853\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2021.1987853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是评估孕妇对流感和百日咳疫苗接种的国家建议的依从性及其不依从性背后的原因。这是一项回顾性观察性研究,在2018年12月至2019年12月期间,在医疗保健标准良好的明确产妇人群中进行。研究对象为1006名产妇和66名医护人员。收集的数据包括孕妇的人口-产科特征、她们是否接受了产前免疫接种、接种疫苗的原因以及保健专业人员对产前免疫接种的意见。怀孕期间流感和百日咳疫苗的吸收是次优的,缺乏卫生保健提供者的疫苗推荐是主要障碍。与产前流感疫苗接种呈正相关的因素是较高的母亲教育水平和高龄,而产前百日咳疫苗接种与较高的母亲教育水平呈正相关。这项大规模的回顾性研究揭示了希腊克里特岛产前百日咳和流感疫苗接种率的不足。结果提示,产科医生对疫苗接种的信心对妊娠期实施免疫至关重要,应消除对疫苗有效性和安全性的任何疑虑。常规产前疫苗接种咨询和妊娠免疫运动对于提高妊娠期间疫苗的吸收率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influenza and Pertussis Vaccine Uptake during Pregnancy: Determinants Found through a Multi-Center Questionnaire Study of Pregnant Women and Healthcare Professionals.

The objective of this article is to assess the adherence of pregnant women to the national recommendations for influenza and pertussis vaccination and the reasons behind their non-adherence. This was a retrospective observational study conducted in a well-defined puerperant population of adequate healthcare standards from December 2018 to December 2019. The study was carried out with 1006 puerperants and 66 health care practitioners. Data were collected, including demographic-obstetric features of pregnant women, whether they received antenatal vaccination, the reasons for having been vaccinated or not as well as health professional's opinion regarding antenatal immunization. The uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccine during pregnancy was suboptimal with lack of recommendation of the vaccine by the healthcare providers being the main barrier. Factors positively associated with antenatal vaccination against influenza were higher level of maternal education and advanced maternal age while antenatal vaccination against pertussis was positively associated with higher level of maternal education. This large-scale retrospective study reveals the inadequacy of antenatal vaccination rates against pertussis and influenza in Crete, Greece. Results suggest that obstetricians' confidence in vaccination is of outmost importance for implementing immunization in pregnancy and any doubts on vaccine effectiveness and safety should be resolved. Routine antenatal vaccination counseling and pregnancy immunization campaigns are essential to improve vaccine uptake during pregnancy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Habit and Its Determinants with Medication Adherence in Chilean Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Randomized Controlled Trial of the Behavioral Intervention for Increasing Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Project: Fidelity Monitoring and Outcomes Sociodemographic Factors, Health-Risk Behaviors, and Chronic Conditions Are Associated with a High Prevalence of Depressive Symptoms: Findings from the Indonesian Family Life Survey-5. The Indirect Effects of Recalled Trauma Severity on Pain Ratings among People with Fibromyalgia: a Moderated Mediation Model. Health Related Quality of Life and Cardiovascular Risk Factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1