以人为本的设计和健康干预措施设计思维的综合回顾。

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12805
Marion Leary, Pamela Z Cacchione, George Demiris, J Margo Brooks Carthon, Jose A Bauermeister
{"title":"以人为本的设计和健康干预措施设计思维的综合回顾。","authors":"Marion Leary,&nbsp;Pamela Z Cacchione,&nbsp;George Demiris,&nbsp;J Margo Brooks Carthon,&nbsp;Jose A Bauermeister","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1137-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Marion Leary,&nbsp;Pamela Z Cacchione,&nbsp;George Demiris,&nbsp;J Margo Brooks Carthon,&nbsp;Jose A Bauermeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nuf.12805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"1137-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在美国,我们有一个医疗保健系统危机与患者和提供者的高不满率。为了改变健康和医疗保健,临床提供者必须精通以人为本的设计思维(DT)方法。目的:综合以人为本设计(HCD)和以人为本设计(DT)的文献,为健康干预措施的制定提供参考。方法:我们对HCD和DT在临床医疗环境中的应用进行了综合文献综述。从开始到2020年11月6日,搜索了四个研究数据库。我们分析了所使用的方法,谁在使用框架,以及包括的DT阶段。结果:24篇文章纳入最终分析。在24篇论文中,6篇(25%)由护士主导,15篇(63%)的第一作者和最后作者是跨学科的(例如,护理和医学)。总体而言,10/24(42%)包括所有DT方法。当通过方法或方法分析文章时,12(50%)表示他们使用HCD方法,5(21%)使用DT方法,7(29%)表示他们同时使用HCD方法和DT方法。结论:世卫组织使用DT和用于创建卫生保健干预措施的阶段存在不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions.

Background: In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).

Objective: To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.

Methods: We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.

Results: Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.

Conclusion: There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Enrollment ADN-BSN Programs: A Call to Expand Access to This Innovative Approach to the BSN Clinical Supervision in Improving the Quality of Nursing Care: Empowerment of Medical-Surgical Hospitalization Teams Preterm Infant Care Practice among Nurses in Neonatal Care Units of Selected Hospitals of Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study Self-Management Social Support in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis Stigma towards Chronically Ill Patients among Healthcare Workers Caring for COVID-19 Patients during the Outbreak in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1