Marion Leary, Pamela Z Cacchione, George Demiris, J Margo Brooks Carthon, Jose A Bauermeister
{"title":"以人为本的设计和健康干预措施设计思维的综合回顾。","authors":"Marion Leary, Pamela Z Cacchione, George Demiris, J Margo Brooks Carthon, Jose A Bauermeister","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1137-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Marion Leary, Pamela Z Cacchione, George Demiris, J Margo Brooks Carthon, Jose A Bauermeister\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nuf.12805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"1137-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions.
Background: In the United States, we have a healthcare system crisis with high rates of dissatisfaction among patients and providers. To transform health and healthcare, clinical providers must be proficient in the human-centered approach of design thinking (DT).
Objective: To synthesize the human-centered design (HCD) and DT literature for the creation of health interventions.
Methods: We performed an integrative literature review focused on how HCD and DT are used in the clinical healthcare setting. Four research databases were searched from inception through November 6, 2020. We analyzed the methodology used, who is using the frameworks, and the DT phases included.
Results: Twenty-four articles were included in the final analysis. Of the 24 manuscripts, 6 (25%) were nurse-led and 15 (63%) had interdisciplinary first and last authors (e.g., Nursing and Medicine). Overall, 10/24 (42%) included all DT method. When analyzing the articles by approach or methodology, 12 (50%) stated they were using the HCD approach, 5 (21%) the DT methodology, and 7 (29%) stated they were using both the HCD approach and DT methodology.
Conclusion: There are inconsistencies in who uses DT and the phases used to create healthcare interventions.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.