解释成功执行家庭监督令的风险因素:荷兰儿童保护中的智障家庭。

IF 4.5 2区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Maltreatment Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1177/10775595231159665
Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, I B Wissink Inge, Annick Zijlstra, G J J M Stams Geert Jan
{"title":"解释成功执行家庭监督令的风险因素:荷兰儿童保护中的智障家庭。","authors":"Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, I B Wissink Inge, Annick Zijlstra, G J J M Stams Geert Jan","doi":"10.1177/10775595231159665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Families with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID) are overrepresented in child protection, and are at higher risk for long and unsuccessful family supervision orders (FSOs). This is worrisome, as many children apparently are exposed to unsafe parenting situations for longer periods of time. Therefore, the present study examined which child and parental factors and child maltreatment are related to the duration and success of an FSO in families with MBID in the Netherlands. Casefile data were analysed of 140 children with an ended FSO. Results from binary logistic regression analyses showed that in families with MBID, young children, children with psychiatric problems, and children with MBID were at higher risk for a longer duration of FSOs. Furthermore, young children, children with MBID and children who were sexually abused had a lower chance of a successful FSO. Unexpectedly, children who witnessed domestic violence or whose parents were divorced, had a higher chance of a successful FSO. The discussion focuses on implications of these results for treatment and care of families with MBID from the perspective of child protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48052,"journal":{"name":"Child Maltreatment","volume":" ","pages":"297-308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining Risk Factors for Successful Family Supervision Orders: Families with Intellectual Disabilities in Child Protection in the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Tessel Sterenborg, Maroesjka van Nieuwenhuijzen, I B Wissink Inge, Annick Zijlstra, G J J M Stams Geert Jan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10775595231159665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Families with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID) are overrepresented in child protection, and are at higher risk for long and unsuccessful family supervision orders (FSOs). This is worrisome, as many children apparently are exposed to unsafe parenting situations for longer periods of time. Therefore, the present study examined which child and parental factors and child maltreatment are related to the duration and success of an FSO in families with MBID in the Netherlands. Casefile data were analysed of 140 children with an ended FSO. Results from binary logistic regression analyses showed that in families with MBID, young children, children with psychiatric problems, and children with MBID were at higher risk for a longer duration of FSOs. Furthermore, young children, children with MBID and children who were sexually abused had a lower chance of a successful FSO. Unexpectedly, children who witnessed domestic violence or whose parents were divorced, had a higher chance of a successful FSO. The discussion focuses on implications of these results for treatment and care of families with MBID from the perspective of child protection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Maltreatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"297-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Maltreatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231159665\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Maltreatment","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595231159665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有轻度至边缘智力障碍(MBID)的家庭在儿童保护中所占比例过高,而且更有可能面临长期和不成功的家庭监督令(FSO)。这一点令人担忧,因为许多儿童显然更长时间地处于不安全的养育环境中。因此,本研究调查了荷兰患有 MBID 的家庭中,哪些儿童和父母因素以及儿童虐待与家庭监管令的持续时间和成功率有关。研究分析了 140 名已结束 FSO 的儿童的病例资料。二元逻辑回归分析的结果显示,在患有 MBID 的家庭中,幼儿、有精神问题的儿童和患有 MBID 的儿童的 FSO 持续时间较长的风险较高。此外,幼儿、患有 MBID 的儿童和遭受过性虐待的儿童成功完成 FSO 的几率较低。出乎意料的是,目睹家庭暴力或父母离异的儿童成功进行 FSO 的几率更高。讨论的重点是从儿童保护的角度出发,探讨这些结果对治疗和照顾患有甲基溴性脑膜炎的家庭的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining Risk Factors for Successful Family Supervision Orders: Families with Intellectual Disabilities in Child Protection in the Netherlands.

Families with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities (MBID) are overrepresented in child protection, and are at higher risk for long and unsuccessful family supervision orders (FSOs). This is worrisome, as many children apparently are exposed to unsafe parenting situations for longer periods of time. Therefore, the present study examined which child and parental factors and child maltreatment are related to the duration and success of an FSO in families with MBID in the Netherlands. Casefile data were analysed of 140 children with an ended FSO. Results from binary logistic regression analyses showed that in families with MBID, young children, children with psychiatric problems, and children with MBID were at higher risk for a longer duration of FSOs. Furthermore, young children, children with MBID and children who were sexually abused had a lower chance of a successful FSO. Unexpectedly, children who witnessed domestic violence or whose parents were divorced, had a higher chance of a successful FSO. The discussion focuses on implications of these results for treatment and care of families with MBID from the perspective of child protection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Maltreatment
Child Maltreatment Multiple-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.80%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Child Maltreatment is the official journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC), the nation"s largest interdisciplinary child maltreatment professional organization. Child Maltreatment"s object is to foster professional excellence in the field of child abuse and neglect by reporting current and at-issue scientific information and technical innovations in a form immediately useful to practitioners and researchers from mental health, child protection, law, law enforcement, medicine, nursing, and allied disciplines. Child Maltreatment emphasizes perspectives with a rigorous scientific base that are relevant to policy, practice, and research.
期刊最新文献
Child Protective Services Reports After Reunification: An Examination of the Risk of Being Rereported to Child Protective Services After Returning Home From Foster Care. Factors Associated With Permanency for Children in Out-Of-Home Placement: A Survival Analysis. Clinical Consultation During a Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Community-Based Learning Collaborative: Examination of Consultation Content, Consultative Strategies, and Provider Engagement. Contamination in Observational Research on Child Maltreatment: A Conceptual and Empirical Review With Implications for Future Research. Prevalence of Diverse Genders and Sexualities in Australia and Associations With Five Forms of Child Maltreatment and Multi-type Maltreatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1