Xin Liu MD, Li Jiang MD, Xi Peng MD, Ling Xu MD, Lingling Huang MD, Qunfang Wan PhD
{"title":"评估双重干预对姑息治疗肺癌患者非正式照护者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xin Liu MD, Li Jiang MD, Xi Peng MD, Ling Xu MD, Lingling Huang MD, Qunfang Wan PhD","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the effects of dyadic intervention on anxiety, depression, care burden and quality of life in informal caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Informal caregivers of palliative lung cancer patients bear a large number of negative emotions during the process of caring for the patients. Dyadic intervention has the potential for improving them but the overall effect is unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>All randomized controlled trials were retrieved from the following databases until 4 May 2023: Web of Science, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials, Weipu, Wanfang and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Review methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review was performed by Stata 12.0 and Review Manager 5.3.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen randomized controlled trials were in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria (<i>n</i> = 1807). The results revealed that dyadic intervention significantly improved family caregivers' anxiety, depression and caregiver burden of palliative patients with lung cancer. There was no significant difference in quality of life between the dyadic intervention group and family caregivers who did not receive the dyadic intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Dyadic intervention positively impacts the experience of family caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the effects of dyadic intervention for informal caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xin Liu MD, Li Jiang MD, Xi Peng MD, Ling Xu MD, Lingling Huang MD, Qunfang Wan PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijn.13217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the effects of dyadic intervention on anxiety, depression, care burden and quality of life in informal caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Informal caregivers of palliative lung cancer patients bear a large number of negative emotions during the process of caring for the patients. Dyadic intervention has the potential for improving them but the overall effect is unclear.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data sources</h3>\\n \\n <p>All randomized controlled trials were retrieved from the following databases until 4 May 2023: Web of Science, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials, Weipu, Wanfang and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Review methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review was performed by Stata 12.0 and Review Manager 5.3.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirteen randomized controlled trials were in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria (<i>n</i> = 1807). The results revealed that dyadic intervention significantly improved family caregivers' anxiety, depression and caregiver burden of palliative patients with lung cancer. There was no significant difference in quality of life between the dyadic intervention group and family caregivers who did not receive the dyadic intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dyadic intervention positively impacts the experience of family caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨双重干预对肺癌姑息治疗患者非正式照护者焦虑、抑郁、照护负担及生活质量的影响。背景:姑息性肺癌患者的非正式照护者在对患者的照护过程中承受着大量的负面情绪。双重干预有可能改善它们，但总体效果尚不清楚。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。数据来源:截至2023年5月4日，所有随机对照试验均从以下数据库检索:Web of Science、Embase Ovid、PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of randomized controlled trials、Weipu、Wanfang和Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure数据库。评审方法:本次评审采用Stata 12.0和Review Manager 5.3进行。结果:13项随机对照试验符合纳入和排除标准(n = 1807)。结果显示，双重干预可显著改善姑息性肺癌患者家庭照顾者的焦虑、抑郁和照顾者负担。在双重干预组和没有接受双重干预的家庭照顾者之间，生活质量没有显著差异。结论:双重干预对姑息性肺癌患者家属照顾者的体验有正向影响。
Evaluating the effects of dyadic intervention for informal caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Aim
To investigate the effects of dyadic intervention on anxiety, depression, care burden and quality of life in informal caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.
Background
Informal caregivers of palliative lung cancer patients bear a large number of negative emotions during the process of caring for the patients. Dyadic intervention has the potential for improving them but the overall effect is unclear.
Design
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data sources
All randomized controlled trials were retrieved from the following databases until 4 May 2023: Web of Science, Embase Ovid, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials, Weipu, Wanfang and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases.
Review methods
This review was performed by Stata 12.0 and Review Manager 5.3.
Results
Thirteen randomized controlled trials were in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria (n = 1807). The results revealed that dyadic intervention significantly improved family caregivers' anxiety, depression and caregiver burden of palliative patients with lung cancer. There was no significant difference in quality of life between the dyadic intervention group and family caregivers who did not receive the dyadic intervention.
Conclusions
Dyadic intervention positively impacts the experience of family caregivers of palliative patients with lung cancer.
期刊介绍：
International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
