急诊护士感知障碍和解决方案,以参与患者的生命限制疾病在严重疾病的谈话:美国多中心混合方法分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2023.09.010
Oluwaseun Adeyemi MBBS, PhD, Laura Walker MD, MBA, Elizabeth Sherrill Bermudez MD, Allison M. Cuthel MPH, Nicole Zhao, Nina Siman MA, MSed, Keith Goldfeld DrPH, MS, MPA, Abraham A. Brody PhD, RN, FAAN, Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois MD, Charles DiMaggio PhD, Joshua Chodosh MD, MSHS, Corita R. Grudzen MD, MSHS, FACEP
{"title":"急诊护士感知障碍和解决方案,以参与患者的生命限制疾病在严重疾病的谈话:美国多中心混合方法分析。","authors":"Oluwaseun Adeyemi MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Laura Walker MD, MBA,&nbsp;Elizabeth Sherrill Bermudez MD,&nbsp;Allison M. Cuthel MPH,&nbsp;Nicole Zhao,&nbsp;Nina Siman MA, MSed,&nbsp;Keith Goldfeld DrPH, MS, MPA,&nbsp;Abraham A. Brody PhD, RN, FAAN,&nbsp;Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois MD,&nbsp;Charles DiMaggio PhD,&nbsp;Joshua Chodosh MD, MSHS,&nbsp;Corita R. Grudzen MD, MSHS, FACEP","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2023.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to assess emergency nurses’ perceived barriers toward engaging patients in serious illness conversations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a mixed-method (quant + QUAL) convergent design, we pooled data on the emergency nurses who underwent the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium training across 33 emergency departments. Data were extracted from the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium post-training questionnaire, comprising a 5-item survey and 1 open-ended question. Our quantitative analysis employed a cross-sectional design to assess the proportion of emergency nurses who report that they will encounter barriers in engaging seriously ill patients in serious illness conversations in the emergency department. Our qualitative analysis used conceptual content analysis to generate themes and meaning units of the perceived barriers and possible solutions toward having serious illness conversations in the emergency department.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2176 emergency nurses responded to the survey. Results from the quantitative analysis showed that 1473 (67.7%) emergency nurses reported that they will encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Three thematic barriers—human factors, time constraints, and challenges in the emergency department work environment—emerged from the content analysis. Some of the subthemes included the perceived difficulty of serious illness conversations, delay in daily throughput, and lack of privacy in the emergency department. The potential solutions extracted included the need for continued training, the provision of dedicated emergency nurses to handle serious illness conversations, and the creation of dedicated spaces for serious illness conversations.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Emergency nurses may encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Institutional-level policies may be required in creating a palliative care-friendly emergency department work environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Nurses’ Perceived Barriers and Solutions to Engaging Patients With Life-Limiting Illnesses in Serious Illness Conversations: A United States Multicenter Mixed-Method Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Oluwaseun Adeyemi MBBS, PhD,&nbsp;Laura Walker MD, MBA,&nbsp;Elizabeth Sherrill Bermudez MD,&nbsp;Allison M. Cuthel MPH,&nbsp;Nicole Zhao,&nbsp;Nina Siman MA, MSed,&nbsp;Keith Goldfeld DrPH, MS, MPA,&nbsp;Abraham A. Brody PhD, RN, FAAN,&nbsp;Jean-Baptiste Bouillon-Minois MD,&nbsp;Charles DiMaggio PhD,&nbsp;Joshua Chodosh MD, MSHS,&nbsp;Corita R. Grudzen MD, MSHS, FACEP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2023.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study aimed to assess emergency nurses’ perceived barriers toward engaging patients in serious illness conversations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using a mixed-method (quant + QUAL) convergent design, we pooled data on the emergency nurses who underwent the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium training across 33 emergency departments. Data were extracted from the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium post-training questionnaire, comprising a 5-item survey and 1 open-ended question. Our quantitative analysis employed a cross-sectional design to assess the proportion of emergency nurses who report that they will encounter barriers in engaging seriously ill patients in serious illness conversations in the emergency department. Our qualitative analysis used conceptual content analysis to generate themes and meaning units of the perceived barriers and possible solutions toward having serious illness conversations in the emergency department.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2176 emergency nurses responded to the survey. Results from the quantitative analysis showed that 1473 (67.7%) emergency nurses reported that they will encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Three thematic barriers—human factors, time constraints, and challenges in the emergency department work environment—emerged from the content analysis. Some of the subthemes included the perceived difficulty of serious illness conversations, delay in daily throughput, and lack of privacy in the emergency department. The potential solutions extracted included the need for continued training, the provision of dedicated emergency nurses to handle serious illness conversations, and the creation of dedicated spaces for serious illness conversations.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Emergency nurses may encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Institutional-level policies may be required in creating a palliative care-friendly emergency department work environment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176723002490\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099176723002490","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在评估急诊护士在与患者进行严重疾病对话时所感受到的障碍。方法:采用混合方法(quant + QUAL)聚合设计,我们汇集了33个急诊科接受临终护理教育联盟培训的急诊护士的数据。数据来自临终护理教育联盟培训后问卷,包括5项调查和1个开放式问题。我们的定量分析采用了横断面设计来评估急诊护士的比例,他们报告说,他们会遇到障碍,参与重症病人在急诊科的重病谈话。我们的定性分析使用概念内容分析来生成主题和意义单元,以感知障碍和可能的解决方案,以便在急诊科进行严重疾病对话。结果:共有2176名急诊护士参与调查。定量分析结果显示,1473名(67.7%)急诊护士报告说,他们在进行严重疾病对话时会遇到障碍。从内容分析中发现了三个主题障碍:人为因素、时间限制和急诊科工作环境的挑战。其中一些次要主题包括严重疾病对话的感知困难,日常吞吐量的延迟,以及在急诊科缺乏隐私。提出的潜在解决办法包括:需要继续进行培训,提供专门的急救护士来处理严重疾病的谈话,以及为严重疾病的谈话创造专门的空间。讨论:急诊护士在进行重病谈话时可能会遇到障碍。在创造有利于姑息治疗的急诊科工作环境方面,可能需要机构层面的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Nurses’ Perceived Barriers and Solutions to Engaging Patients With Life-Limiting Illnesses in Serious Illness Conversations: A United States Multicenter Mixed-Method Analysis

Introduction

This study aimed to assess emergency nurses’ perceived barriers toward engaging patients in serious illness conversations.

Methods

Using a mixed-method (quant + QUAL) convergent design, we pooled data on the emergency nurses who underwent the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium training across 33 emergency departments. Data were extracted from the End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium post-training questionnaire, comprising a 5-item survey and 1 open-ended question. Our quantitative analysis employed a cross-sectional design to assess the proportion of emergency nurses who report that they will encounter barriers in engaging seriously ill patients in serious illness conversations in the emergency department. Our qualitative analysis used conceptual content analysis to generate themes and meaning units of the perceived barriers and possible solutions toward having serious illness conversations in the emergency department.

Results

A total of 2176 emergency nurses responded to the survey. Results from the quantitative analysis showed that 1473 (67.7%) emergency nurses reported that they will encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Three thematic barriers—human factors, time constraints, and challenges in the emergency department work environment—emerged from the content analysis. Some of the subthemes included the perceived difficulty of serious illness conversations, delay in daily throughput, and lack of privacy in the emergency department. The potential solutions extracted included the need for continued training, the provision of dedicated emergency nurses to handle serious illness conversations, and the creation of dedicated spaces for serious illness conversations.

Discussion

Emergency nurses may encounter barriers while engaging in serious illness conversations. Institutional-level policies may be required in creating a palliative care-friendly emergency department work environment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Frailty Scales in Emergency Department: Highlighting the Strengths of the Triage Frailty and Comorbidity Tool. An Analysis of Psychological Capital and Influencing Factors Among Disaster Care Reservists. Uncovering the Driving Forces of Emergency Nurses' Retention: Findings From a Grounded Theory Study. Emergency Management and Nursing Considerations of Carotid Blowout Syndrome. An Introduction to the Semantics and Statistics Behind the Firearm Policy Debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1