复发性直肠脱垂的手术选择-回顾性单中心经验。

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Polish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0016.2727
Tomasz Kościński, Krzysztof Szmyt
{"title":"复发性直肠脱垂的手术选择-回顾性单中心经验。","authors":"Tomasz Kościński,&nbsp;Krzysztof Szmyt","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most authors highlight the absence of international guidelines in the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP), even among coloproctologists. However, it is clearly indicated that Delormes or Thierschs surgeries are reserved for older and fragile patients, so on the other hand, transabdominal surgeries are dedicated to generally fitter patients. The aim of the study is evaluation of surgical treatment effects for recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP)Methods: The study group comprised of 20 female and 2 male patients aged from 37 to 92 years (subjected to treatment last 20 years). Initial treatment consisted of abdominal mesh rectopexy (n=4), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=9), Delormes technique (n=3), Thierschs anal banding (n=3), colpoperineoplasty (n=2), anterior sigmorectal resection (n=1). The relapses occured between 2 to 30 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reoperations consisted of abdominal without (n=8) or with resection rectopexy (n=3), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=5), Delormes technique (n=1), total pelvic floor repair (n=4), perineoplasty (n=1). 11 patients (50%) were completely cured. 6 patients developed subsequent RRP. They were successfully reoperated (2 rectopexies, 2 perineocolporectopexies, 2 perineal sigmorectal resections).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal mesh rectopexy is the most effective method for RP and RRP treatment. Total pelvic floor repair may prevent RRP. Perineal rectosigmoid resection results of less permament effects of RRP repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the surgical options for recurrent rectal prolapse - a retrospective single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Tomasz Kościński,&nbsp;Krzysztof Szmyt\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.2727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most authors highlight the absence of international guidelines in the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP), even among coloproctologists. However, it is clearly indicated that Delormes or Thierschs surgeries are reserved for older and fragile patients, so on the other hand, transabdominal surgeries are dedicated to generally fitter patients. The aim of the study is evaluation of surgical treatment effects for recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP)Methods: The study group comprised of 20 female and 2 male patients aged from 37 to 92 years (subjected to treatment last 20 years). Initial treatment consisted of abdominal mesh rectopexy (n=4), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=9), Delormes technique (n=3), Thierschs anal banding (n=3), colpoperineoplasty (n=2), anterior sigmorectal resection (n=1). The relapses occured between 2 to 30 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reoperations consisted of abdominal without (n=8) or with resection rectopexy (n=3), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=5), Delormes technique (n=1), total pelvic floor repair (n=4), perineoplasty (n=1). 11 patients (50%) were completely cured. 6 patients developed subsequent RRP. They were successfully reoperated (2 rectopexies, 2 perineocolporectopexies, 2 perineal sigmorectal resections).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Abdominal mesh rectopexy is the most effective method for RP and RRP treatment. Total pelvic floor repair may prevent RRP. Perineal rectosigmoid resection results of less permament effects of RRP repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.2727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数作者强调缺乏治疗复发性直肠脱垂(RRP)的国际指南,即使在直肠科医生中也是如此。然而,明确指出Delormes或Thierschs手术是为年长者和身体虚弱的患者保留的,而另一方面,经腹手术是为一般较健康的患者提供的。本研究旨在评价复发性直肠脱垂(RRP)手术治疗的效果。方法:研究组为女性20例,男性2例,年龄37 ~ 92岁(治疗时间近20年)。初始治疗包括腹部网状直肠固定术(n=4),会阴sigmo直肠切除术(n=9), Delormes技术(n=3), Thierschs肛门捆扎术(n=3),阴道肿瘤成形术(n=2),前sigmo直肠切除术(n=1)。复发发生在2至30个月之间。结果:再手术包括腹部不切除(n=8)或合并切除直肠固定术(n=3)、会阴sigmo直肠切除术(n=5)、Delormes技术(n=1)、全盆底修复(n=4)、会阴成形术(n=1)。11例(50%)完全治愈。6例患者出现后续RRP。再次手术成功(2例直肠切除术,2例会阴直肠切除术,2例会阴直肠直肠切除术)。结论:腹壁补片固定术是治疗RP和RRP最有效的方法。全盆底修复可预防RRP。会阴乙状结肠直肠切除术的效果较RRP修复效果小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the surgical options for recurrent rectal prolapse - a retrospective single-center experience.

Objectives: Most authors highlight the absence of international guidelines in the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP), even among coloproctologists. However, it is clearly indicated that Delormes or Thierschs surgeries are reserved for older and fragile patients, so on the other hand, transabdominal surgeries are dedicated to generally fitter patients. The aim of the study is evaluation of surgical treatment effects for recurrent rectal prolapse (RRP)Methods: The study group comprised of 20 female and 2 male patients aged from 37 to 92 years (subjected to treatment last 20 years). Initial treatment consisted of abdominal mesh rectopexy (n=4), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=9), Delormes technique (n=3), Thierschs anal banding (n=3), colpoperineoplasty (n=2), anterior sigmorectal resection (n=1). The relapses occured between 2 to 30 months.

Results: Reoperations consisted of abdominal without (n=8) or with resection rectopexy (n=3), perineal sigmorectal resection (n=5), Delormes technique (n=1), total pelvic floor repair (n=4), perineoplasty (n=1). 11 patients (50%) were completely cured. 6 patients developed subsequent RRP. They were successfully reoperated (2 rectopexies, 2 perineocolporectopexies, 2 perineal sigmorectal resections).

Conclusions: Abdominal mesh rectopexy is the most effective method for RP and RRP treatment. Total pelvic floor repair may prevent RRP. Perineal rectosigmoid resection results of less permament effects of RRP repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Hemorrhoidal laser ablation procedure: a minimally invasive treatment for grades II, III, and IV using a 1470 nm diode laser The impact of adipose fat tissue on pathogenesis of crypto-glandular anal fistula Assessment of the usefulness and effectiveness of interactive telemedicine classes in surgery – survey of polish medical students The intraoperative application of indocyanine green (ICG), in breast reconstructive surgery using a latissimus dorsi flap, as a preventive factor for tissue ischemia and postoperative complications Analysis of risk factor for surgical site infection and other postoperative complications in patients following loop ileostomy reversal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1