自动工资指数化会毁掉工作吗?机器学习方法。

IF 2.4 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economist-Netherlands Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s10645-023-09418-y
Gert Bijnens, Shyngys Karimov, Jozef Konings
{"title":"自动工资指数化会毁掉工作吗?机器学习方法。","authors":"Gert Bijnens, Shyngys Karimov, Jozef Konings","doi":"10.1007/s10645-023-09418-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper analyzes the impact of automatic wage indexation on employment. To boost competitiveness and increase employment, Belgium suspended its automatic wage indexation system in 2015. This resulted in a 2% fall in real wages for all workers. In the absence of a suitable control group, we use machine learning for the counterfactual analysis. We artificially construct the control group for a difference-in-difference analysis based on the pre-treatment evolution of treated firms. We find a positive impact on employment of 1.2%, which corresponds to a labor demand elasticity of - 0.6. This effect is more pronounced for manufacturing firms, where the elasticity reaches - 1. These results show that a suspension of the automatic wage indexation mechanism can be effective in preserving employment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46156,"journal":{"name":"Economist-Netherlands","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Automatic Wage Indexation Destroy Jobs? A Machine Learning Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Gert Bijnens, Shyngys Karimov, Jozef Konings\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10645-023-09418-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper analyzes the impact of automatic wage indexation on employment. To boost competitiveness and increase employment, Belgium suspended its automatic wage indexation system in 2015. This resulted in a 2% fall in real wages for all workers. In the absence of a suitable control group, we use machine learning for the counterfactual analysis. We artificially construct the control group for a difference-in-difference analysis based on the pre-treatment evolution of treated firms. We find a positive impact on employment of 1.2%, which corresponds to a labor demand elasticity of - 0.6. This effect is more pronounced for manufacturing firms, where the elasticity reaches - 1. These results show that a suspension of the automatic wage indexation mechanism can be effective in preserving employment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economist-Netherlands\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9932419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economist-Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-023-09418-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economist-Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-023-09418-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了工资自动指数化对就业的影响。为了提高竞争力和增加就业,比利时于2015年暂停了工资自动指数化制度。这导致所有工人的实际工资下降了 2%。由于没有合适的对照组,我们使用机器学习进行反事实分析。我们人为地构建了一个对照组,根据受治疗企业在治疗前的变化情况进行差分分析。我们发现这对就业产生了 1.2% 的积极影响,相当于劳动力需求弹性为 -0.6。对制造业企业的影响更为明显,其弹性为-1。这些结果表明,暂停工资自动指数化机制可以有效地保护就业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Automatic Wage Indexation Destroy Jobs? A Machine Learning Approach.

This paper analyzes the impact of automatic wage indexation on employment. To boost competitiveness and increase employment, Belgium suspended its automatic wage indexation system in 2015. This resulted in a 2% fall in real wages for all workers. In the absence of a suitable control group, we use machine learning for the counterfactual analysis. We artificially construct the control group for a difference-in-difference analysis based on the pre-treatment evolution of treated firms. We find a positive impact on employment of 1.2%, which corresponds to a labor demand elasticity of - 0.6. This effect is more pronounced for manufacturing firms, where the elasticity reaches - 1. These results show that a suspension of the automatic wage indexation mechanism can be effective in preserving employment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Since 1852, De Economist, the Netherlands Economic Review, has provided an outlet for high quality research in economics. Emphasizing European issues, it offers insightful studies that deal with theoretical issues as well as applied work. The journal also publishes important surveys of current research. Authors of articles based on empirical research are required to make their datasets available to readers, enabling them to replicate the research results. Officially cited as: De Economist
期刊最新文献
The Price of Flexible Jobs: Wage Differentials between Permanent and Flexible Jobs in the Netherlands Distortions in Investment Timing and Quantity in Real Options with Asymmetric Information Call for Papers: Special Issue on "Scientific Insights to Deliver Sustainable Growth and Full Employment" Call for Papers: Special Issue on “Inequality in the Housing Market” Foreign Supply Shocks and the Structure of Trade in a Small Open Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1