当日颈动脉支架置入和冠状动脉搭桥手术。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Texas Heart Institute journal Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14503/THIJ-21-7781
Igor Zivkovic, Stasa Krasic, Petar Milacic, Miroslav Milicic, Petar Vukovic, Zoran Tabakovic, Dragan Sagic, Nenad Ilijevski, Ivana Petrovic, Miodrag Peric, Milovan Bojic, Slobodan Micovic
{"title":"当日颈动脉支架置入和冠状动脉搭桥手术。","authors":"Igor Zivkovic,&nbsp;Stasa Krasic,&nbsp;Petar Milacic,&nbsp;Miroslav Milicic,&nbsp;Petar Vukovic,&nbsp;Zoran Tabakovic,&nbsp;Dragan Sagic,&nbsp;Nenad Ilijevski,&nbsp;Ivana Petrovic,&nbsp;Miodrag Peric,&nbsp;Milovan Bojic,&nbsp;Slobodan Micovic","doi":"10.14503/THIJ-21-7781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment strategy for patients with severe carotid artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is still problematic. The important question is whether it is necessary to treat significant carotid disease in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. This study analyzed short- and midterm results after same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2013 to 2020, a total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study. Same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting were performed in all patients. The study's primary end points were the evaluation rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within short- and midterm periods after the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-day mortality was 0%. The occurrences of perioperative adverse events, namely stroke, myocardial infarction, and transient ischemic attack, were 1 (1.4%), 1 (1.4%), and 4 (5.8%), respectively. Mean (IQR) follow-up time was 28 (IQR, 17-43) months. Six (8.8%) patients died during this period. Fatal stroke was registered in 2 cases, and 1 patient experienced a disabling stroke with a fatal outcome. The other 3 patients died because of chronic renal disease, a traffic accident, and for an unknown reason, respectively. Midterm survival in the group was 91.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed that same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting for concomitant carotid and coronary disease treatment could be a promising and feasible therapeutic strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22352,"journal":{"name":"Texas Heart Institute journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969787/pdf/i1526-6702-50-1-e217781.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Same-Day Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Igor Zivkovic,&nbsp;Stasa Krasic,&nbsp;Petar Milacic,&nbsp;Miroslav Milicic,&nbsp;Petar Vukovic,&nbsp;Zoran Tabakovic,&nbsp;Dragan Sagic,&nbsp;Nenad Ilijevski,&nbsp;Ivana Petrovic,&nbsp;Miodrag Peric,&nbsp;Milovan Bojic,&nbsp;Slobodan Micovic\",\"doi\":\"10.14503/THIJ-21-7781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment strategy for patients with severe carotid artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is still problematic. The important question is whether it is necessary to treat significant carotid disease in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. This study analyzed short- and midterm results after same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2013 to 2020, a total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study. Same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting were performed in all patients. The study's primary end points were the evaluation rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within short- and midterm periods after the procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-day mortality was 0%. The occurrences of perioperative adverse events, namely stroke, myocardial infarction, and transient ischemic attack, were 1 (1.4%), 1 (1.4%), and 4 (5.8%), respectively. Mean (IQR) follow-up time was 28 (IQR, 17-43) months. Six (8.8%) patients died during this period. Fatal stroke was registered in 2 cases, and 1 patient experienced a disabling stroke with a fatal outcome. The other 3 patients died because of chronic renal disease, a traffic accident, and for an unknown reason, respectively. Midterm survival in the group was 91.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study showed that same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting for concomitant carotid and coronary disease treatment could be a promising and feasible therapeutic strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9969787/pdf/i1526-6702-50-1-e217781.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Texas Heart Institute journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-21-7781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Heart Institute journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-21-7781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重颈动脉病变患者行冠状动脉搭桥术的最佳治疗策略仍是一个问题。重要的问题是是否有必要治疗冠状动脉搭桥术患者的重大颈动脉疾病。本研究分析了当日颈动脉支架置入术和冠状动脉旁路移植术的短期和中期结果。方法:2013 - 2020年共纳入69例患者。所有患者均于当日行颈动脉支架置入术和冠状动脉搭桥术。研究的主要终点是手术后短期和中期中风、心肌梗死和死亡的评估率。结果:30天死亡率为0%。围手术期不良事件发生率分别为卒中1例(1.4%)、心肌梗死1例(1.4%)、短暂性脑缺血发作4例(5.8%)。平均(IQR)随访时间28 (IQR, 17-43)个月。6例(8.8%)患者在此期间死亡。2例发生致死性中风,1例发生致残性中风并导致死亡。另外3名患者分别死于慢性肾病、交通事故和不明原因。该组中期生存率为91.2%。结论:当日行颈动脉支架植入术联合冠状动脉搭桥术治疗颈动脉和冠状动脉病变是一种可行的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Same-Day Carotid Artery Stenting and Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for patients with severe carotid artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting is still problematic. The important question is whether it is necessary to treat significant carotid disease in patients who have undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. This study analyzed short- and midterm results after same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting.

Methods: From 2013 to 2020, a total of 69 patients were enrolled in the study. Same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting were performed in all patients. The study's primary end points were the evaluation rate of stroke, myocardial infarction, and death within short- and midterm periods after the procedures.

Results: The 30-day mortality was 0%. The occurrences of perioperative adverse events, namely stroke, myocardial infarction, and transient ischemic attack, were 1 (1.4%), 1 (1.4%), and 4 (5.8%), respectively. Mean (IQR) follow-up time was 28 (IQR, 17-43) months. Six (8.8%) patients died during this period. Fatal stroke was registered in 2 cases, and 1 patient experienced a disabling stroke with a fatal outcome. The other 3 patients died because of chronic renal disease, a traffic accident, and for an unknown reason, respectively. Midterm survival in the group was 91.2%.

Conclusion: The study showed that same-day carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass grafting for concomitant carotid and coronary disease treatment could be a promising and feasible therapeutic strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Texas Heart Institute journal
Texas Heart Institute journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
131
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: For more than 45 years, the Texas Heart Institute Journal has been published by the Texas Heart Institute as part of its medical education program. Our bimonthly peer-reviewed journal enjoys a global audience of physicians, scientists, and healthcare professionals who are contributing to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The Journal was printed under the name of Cardiovascular Diseases from 1974 through 1981 (ISSN 0093-3546). The name was changed to Texas Heart Institute Journal in 1982 and was printed through 2013 (ISSN 0730-2347). In 2014, the Journal moved to online-only publication. It is indexed by Index Medicus/MEDLINE and by other indexing and abstracting services worldwide. Our full archive is available at PubMed Central. The Journal invites authors to submit these article types for review: -Clinical Investigations- Laboratory Investigations- Reviews- Techniques- Coronary Anomalies- History of Medicine- Case Reports/Case Series (Submission Fee: $70.00 USD)- Images in Cardiovascular Medicine (Submission Fee: $35.00 USD)- Guest Editorials- Peabody’s Corner- Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Fulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Autoimmune Disease That Requires Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. Strategies for Catheter Ablation of Premature Ventricular Contractions and Ventricular Tachycardia With Intramural Origins. Heart Transplantation in a Patient With Rheumatic Heart Disease and Severe Left Atrial Calcification. Incidence and Impact of Takotsubo Syndrome in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. Does Serum Uric Acid to Creatinine Ratio Predict Mortality Risk in Patients With Heart Failure?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1