探索器械引导和非器械引导下慢呼吸的血压调节机制:一个小综述

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103050
Harika Pingali, Stacy D. Hunter
{"title":"探索器械引导和非器械引导下慢呼吸的血压调节机制:一个小综述","authors":"Harika Pingali,&nbsp;Stacy D. Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hypertension is a widespread disease that, if persistent, increases the risks of coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity. Slow breathing is a recommended blood pressure-lowering strategy though the mechanisms mediating its effects are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This review aims to evaluate autonomic and vascular function as potential mediators driving BP adaptive responses with slow breathing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched EBSCO host, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed using key words for optimized search results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Nineteen studies were included in this review (11 device-guided; 8 non-device-guided breathing). Though some studies showed increased vagally mediated components of heart rate variability<span> during slow breathing, results from acute and long-term studies were incongruent. Increases in baroreflex<span> sensitivity (BRS) following a single device-guided slow breathing bout were noted in normotensive and hypertensive adults. Long-term (4 weeks to 3 months) effects of slow breathing on BRS were absent. Device-guided breathing resulted in immediate reductions in muscle sympathetic nerve activity<span> (MSNA) in normo- and hyper-tensive adults though results from long-term studies yielded inconsistent findings. Non-device-guided slow breathing posed acute and chronic effects on vascular function with reductions in arterial stiffness in adults with </span></span></span></span>type I diabetes<span> and increases in microvascular endothelial function<span> in adults with irritable bowel syndrome<span>. Non-device guided breathing also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in healthy and hypertensive adults in acute and chronic studies. No adverse effects or non-adherence to treatment were noted in these trials.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Device-guided slow breathing is a feasible and effective modality in improving BRS, HRV, and arterial stiffness though its long-term effects are obscure. Though less evidence exists supporting the efficacy of non-device-guided slow breathing, acute and chronic studies demonstrate improvements in vascular function and inflammatory cytokines. More studies are needed to further explore the long-term effects of slow breathing in general and non-device-guided breathing in particular.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55410,"journal":{"name":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring mechanisms of blood pressure regulation in response to device-guided and non-device-guided slow breathing: A mini review\",\"authors\":\"Harika Pingali,&nbsp;Stacy D. Hunter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.autneu.2022.103050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Hypertension is a widespread disease that, if persistent, increases the risks of coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity. Slow breathing is a recommended blood pressure-lowering strategy though the mechanisms mediating its effects are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This review aims to evaluate autonomic and vascular function as potential mediators driving BP adaptive responses with slow breathing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched EBSCO host, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed using key words for optimized search results.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Nineteen studies were included in this review (11 device-guided; 8 non-device-guided breathing). Though some studies showed increased vagally mediated components of heart rate variability<span> during slow breathing, results from acute and long-term studies were incongruent. Increases in baroreflex<span> sensitivity (BRS) following a single device-guided slow breathing bout were noted in normotensive and hypertensive adults. Long-term (4 weeks to 3 months) effects of slow breathing on BRS were absent. Device-guided breathing resulted in immediate reductions in muscle sympathetic nerve activity<span> (MSNA) in normo- and hyper-tensive adults though results from long-term studies yielded inconsistent findings. Non-device-guided slow breathing posed acute and chronic effects on vascular function with reductions in arterial stiffness in adults with </span></span></span></span>type I diabetes<span> and increases in microvascular endothelial function<span> in adults with irritable bowel syndrome<span>. Non-device guided breathing also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in healthy and hypertensive adults in acute and chronic studies. No adverse effects or non-adherence to treatment were noted in these trials.</span></span></span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Device-guided slow breathing is a feasible and effective modality in improving BRS, HRV, and arterial stiffness though its long-term effects are obscure. Though less evidence exists supporting the efficacy of non-device-guided slow breathing, acute and chronic studies demonstrate improvements in vascular function and inflammatory cytokines. More studies are needed to further explore the long-term effects of slow breathing in general and non-device-guided breathing in particular.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222001096\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autonomic Neuroscience-Basic & Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566070222001096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景高血压是一种广泛存在的疾病,如果持续存在,会增加冠心病的死亡率和发病率。缓慢呼吸是一种推荐的降压策略,尽管其作用机制尚不清楚。目的本综述旨在评估自主神经和血管功能作为缓慢呼吸时驱动BP适应性反应的潜在介质。方法我们使用关键字搜索EBSCO主机、Web of Science、Cochrane对照试验中心注册中心和PubMed,以获得优化的搜索结果。结果本综述共纳入19项研究(11项为器械引导呼吸,8项为非器械引导呼吸)。尽管一些研究表明,在缓慢呼吸过程中,迷走神经介导的心率变异成分增加,但急性和长期研究的结果并不一致。血压正常和高血压成年人在单装置引导下缓慢呼吸后压力反射敏感性(BRS)增加。缓慢呼吸对BRS的长期影响(4周到3个月)不存在。尽管长期研究的结果不一致,但设备引导的呼吸导致正常和高血压成年人的肌肉交感神经活动(MSNA)立即减少。非设备引导的缓慢呼吸对血管功能造成急性和慢性影响,I型糖尿病成年人的动脉硬化度降低,肠易激综合征成年人的微血管内皮功能增加。在急性和慢性研究中,非设备引导呼吸也降低了健康和高血压成年人的促炎细胞因子。在这些试验中没有发现不良反应或不坚持治疗。结论器械引导下缓慢呼吸是一种可行且有效的改善BRS、HRV和动脉硬化的方法,尽管其长期效果尚不明确。尽管支持非设备引导慢呼吸疗效的证据较少,但急性和慢性研究表明,血管功能和炎症细胞因子有所改善。需要更多的研究来进一步探索缓慢呼吸的长期影响,尤其是非设备引导呼吸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring mechanisms of blood pressure regulation in response to device-guided and non-device-guided slow breathing: A mini review

Background

Hypertension is a widespread disease that, if persistent, increases the risks of coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity. Slow breathing is a recommended blood pressure-lowering strategy though the mechanisms mediating its effects are unknown.

Objective

This review aims to evaluate autonomic and vascular function as potential mediators driving BP adaptive responses with slow breathing.

Methods

We searched EBSCO host, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PubMed using key words for optimized search results.

Results

Nineteen studies were included in this review (11 device-guided; 8 non-device-guided breathing). Though some studies showed increased vagally mediated components of heart rate variability during slow breathing, results from acute and long-term studies were incongruent. Increases in baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) following a single device-guided slow breathing bout were noted in normotensive and hypertensive adults. Long-term (4 weeks to 3 months) effects of slow breathing on BRS were absent. Device-guided breathing resulted in immediate reductions in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in normo- and hyper-tensive adults though results from long-term studies yielded inconsistent findings. Non-device-guided slow breathing posed acute and chronic effects on vascular function with reductions in arterial stiffness in adults with type I diabetes and increases in microvascular endothelial function in adults with irritable bowel syndrome. Non-device guided breathing also reduced pro-inflammatory cytokines in healthy and hypertensive adults in acute and chronic studies. No adverse effects or non-adherence to treatment were noted in these trials.

Conclusion

Device-guided slow breathing is a feasible and effective modality in improving BRS, HRV, and arterial stiffness though its long-term effects are obscure. Though less evidence exists supporting the efficacy of non-device-guided slow breathing, acute and chronic studies demonstrate improvements in vascular function and inflammatory cytokines. More studies are needed to further explore the long-term effects of slow breathing in general and non-device-guided breathing in particular.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: This is an international journal with broad coverage of all aspects of the autonomic nervous system in man and animals. The main areas of interest include the innervation of blood vessels and viscera, autonomic ganglia, efferent and afferent autonomic pathways, and autonomic nuclei and pathways in the central nervous system. The Editors will consider papers that deal with any aspect of the autonomic nervous system, including structure, physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, development, evolution, ageing, behavioural aspects, integrative role and influence on emotional and physical states of the body. Interdisciplinary studies will be encouraged. Studies dealing with human pathology will be also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Intrasubject reproducibility of supine norepinephrine plasma concentrations in patients with cardiovascular sympathetic failure The role of peripheral venous distension reflex in regulating hemodynamics: mini review Carotid body interoception in health and disease Renal interoception in health and disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1