法匹拉韦治疗门诊COVID-19:一项多中心、随机、三盲、安慰剂对照临床试验

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Advances in respiratory medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-28 DOI:10.3390/arm91010004
Atefeh Vaezi, Mehrzad Salmasi, Forogh Soltaninejad, Mehrdad Salahi, Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard, Babak Amra
{"title":"法匹拉韦治疗门诊COVID-19:一项多中心、随机、三盲、安慰剂对照临床试验","authors":"Atefeh Vaezi,&nbsp;Mehrzad Salmasi,&nbsp;Forogh Soltaninejad,&nbsp;Mehrdad Salahi,&nbsp;Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard,&nbsp;Babak Amra","doi":"10.3390/arm91010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i>-value = 0.3). No adverse event was reported in the treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7391,"journal":{"name":"Advances in respiratory medicine","volume":"91 1","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951951/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Favipiravir in the Treatment of Outpatient COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Atefeh Vaezi,&nbsp;Mehrzad Salmasi,&nbsp;Forogh Soltaninejad,&nbsp;Mehrdad Salahi,&nbsp;Shaghayegh Haghjooy Javanmard,&nbsp;Babak Amra\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/arm91010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Finding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (<i>p</i>-value = 0.3). No adverse event was reported in the treatment group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in respiratory medicine\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9951951/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in respiratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/arm91010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/arm91010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:寻找有效的门诊治疗方法预防COVID-19进展和住院是必要的,有助于管理有限的医院资源。重新利用先前存在的治疗方法是非常可取的。在本研究中,我们评估了Favipiravir在不符合住院条件的有症状的COVID-19患者中预防住院的疗效。方法:本研究是一项三盲随机对照试验,于2020年12月5日至2021年3月31日在伊朗伊斯法罕的三个门诊中心进行。干预组患者每天服用1600mg Favipiravir,连续5天,对照组患者服用安慰剂。我们的主要结局是从第0天到第28天住院参与者的比例。在第3天、第7天、第14天、第21天和第28天通过电话评估结果。结果:77例患者随机分为法匹拉韦组和安慰剂组。考虑基线特征,两组间无显著差异。在研究期间,Favipiravir组10.5%的患者住院,安慰剂组5.1%的患者住院,但两者之间无显著差异(p值= 0.3)。治疗组无不良事件发生。结论:我们的研究表明,Favipiravir并没有降低门诊轻中度COVID-19患者的住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Favipiravir in the Treatment of Outpatient COVID-19: A Multicenter, Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Finding effective outpatient treatments to prevent COVID-19 progression and hospitalization is necessary and is helpful in managing limited hospital resources. Repurposing previously existing treatments is highly desirable. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of Favipiravir in the prevention of hospitalization in symptomatic COVID-19 patients who were not eligible for hospitalization.

Methods: This study was a triple-blind randomized controlled trial conducted between 5 December 2020 and 31 March 2021 in three outpatient centers in Isfahan, Iran. Patients in the intervention group received Favipiravir 1600 mg daily for five days, and the control group received a placebo. Our primary outcome was the proportion of hospitalized participants from day 0 to day 28. The outcome was assessed on days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 through phone calls.

Results: Seventy-seven patients were randomly allocated to Favipiravir and placebo groups. There was no significant difference between groups considering baseline characteristics. During the study period, 10.5% of patients in the Favipiravir group and 5.1% of patients in the placebo group were hospitalized, but there was no significant difference between them (p-value = 0.3). No adverse event was reported in the treatment group.

Conclusions: Our study shows that Favipiravir did not reduce the hospitalization rate of mild to moderate COVID-19 patients in outpatient settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in respiratory medicine
Advances in respiratory medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is a new international title for "Pneumonologia i Alergologia Polska", edited bimonthly and addressed to respiratory professionals. The Journal contains peer-reviewed original research papers, short communications, case-reports, recommendations of the Polish Respiratory Society concerning the diagnosis and treatment of lung diseases, editorials, postgraduate education articles, letters and book reviews in the field of pneumonology, allergology, oncology, immunology and infectious diseases. "Advances in Respiratory Medicine" is an open access, official journal of Polish Society of Lung Diseases, Polish Society of Allergology and National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases.
期刊最新文献
Expression of Epithelial Alarmin Receptor on Innate Lymphoid Cells Type 2 in Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Utility of Raman Spectroscopy in Pulmonary Medicine. Secure and Transparent Lung and Colon Cancer Classification Using Blockchain and Microsoft Azure. Comparing the Effects of Two Surfactant Administration Methods: Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) with Intubation (INSURE) in Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The Impact of Different Telerehabilitation Methods on Peripheral Muscle Strength and Aerobic Capacity in COPD Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1