炎症性关节炎患者的疫苗接种率、认知和信息来源。

Andrea Lyon, Alannah Quinlivan, Susan Lester, Claire Barrett, Samuel L Whittle, Debra Rowett, Rachel Black, Premarani Sinnathurai, Lyn March, Rachelle Buchbinder, Catherine L Hill
{"title":"炎症性关节炎患者的疫苗接种率、认知和信息来源。","authors":"Andrea Lyon,&nbsp;Alannah Quinlivan,&nbsp;Susan Lester,&nbsp;Claire Barrett,&nbsp;Samuel L Whittle,&nbsp;Debra Rowett,&nbsp;Rachel Black,&nbsp;Premarani Sinnathurai,&nbsp;Lyn March,&nbsp;Rachelle Buchbinder,&nbsp;Catherine L Hill","doi":"10.1002/acr2.11525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine vaccination rates, perceptions, and information sources in people with inflammatory arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database were invited to participate in an online questionnaire, conducted in January 2020, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Included questions were about vaccination history, modified World Health Organization Vaccination Hesitancy Scale, views of the information sources consulted, the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire, education, and the Single-Item Health Literacy Screener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 994 of 1498 (66%). The median age of participants was 62 years, with 67% female. Self-reported adherence was 83% for the influenza vaccine. Participants generally expressed positive vaccination views, particularly regarding safety, efficacy, and access. However, only 43% knew which vaccines were recommended for them. Vaccine hesitancy was primarily attributable to uncertainty and a perceived lack of information about which vaccines were recommended. Participants consulted multiple vaccination information sources (median 3, interquartile range 2-7). General practitioners (89%) and rheumatologists (76%) were the most frequently used information sources and were most likely to yield positive views. Negative views of vaccination were most often from internet chatrooms, social media, and mainstream media. Factors of younger age, male gender, and having more concerns about the harms and overuse of medicines in general were associated with lower adherence and greater uncertainty about vaccinations, whereas education and self-reported literacy were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with inflammatory arthritis generally held positive views about vaccination, although there was considerable uncertainty as to which vaccinations were recommended for them. This study highlights the need for improved consumer information about vaccination recommendations for people with inflammatory arthritis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7084,"journal":{"name":"ACR Open Rheumatology","volume":"5 2","pages":"84-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926066/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vaccination Rates, Perceptions, and Information Sources Used by People With Inflammatory Arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Lyon,&nbsp;Alannah Quinlivan,&nbsp;Susan Lester,&nbsp;Claire Barrett,&nbsp;Samuel L Whittle,&nbsp;Debra Rowett,&nbsp;Rachel Black,&nbsp;Premarani Sinnathurai,&nbsp;Lyn March,&nbsp;Rachelle Buchbinder,&nbsp;Catherine L Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr2.11525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine vaccination rates, perceptions, and information sources in people with inflammatory arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database were invited to participate in an online questionnaire, conducted in January 2020, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Included questions were about vaccination history, modified World Health Organization Vaccination Hesitancy Scale, views of the information sources consulted, the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire, education, and the Single-Item Health Literacy Screener.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rate was 994 of 1498 (66%). The median age of participants was 62 years, with 67% female. Self-reported adherence was 83% for the influenza vaccine. Participants generally expressed positive vaccination views, particularly regarding safety, efficacy, and access. However, only 43% knew which vaccines were recommended for them. Vaccine hesitancy was primarily attributable to uncertainty and a perceived lack of information about which vaccines were recommended. Participants consulted multiple vaccination information sources (median 3, interquartile range 2-7). General practitioners (89%) and rheumatologists (76%) were the most frequently used information sources and were most likely to yield positive views. Negative views of vaccination were most often from internet chatrooms, social media, and mainstream media. Factors of younger age, male gender, and having more concerns about the harms and overuse of medicines in general were associated with lower adherence and greater uncertainty about vaccinations, whereas education and self-reported literacy were not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants with inflammatory arthritis generally held positive views about vaccination, although there was considerable uncertainty as to which vaccinations were recommended for them. This study highlights the need for improved consumer information about vaccination recommendations for people with inflammatory arthritis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"84-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9926066/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR Open Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR Open Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:确定炎症性关节炎患者的疫苗接种率、认知和信息来源。方法:在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前,澳大利亚风湿病协会数据库的参与者被邀请参加2020年1月进行的在线问卷调查。包括关于疫苗接种史、修订的世界卫生组织疫苗接种犹豫量表、咨询信息来源的观点、对药物的信念问卷、教育和单项健康素养筛查。结果:1498例患者中有效率994例(66%)。参与者的中位年龄为62岁,其中67%为女性。自我报告的流感疫苗依从性为83%。与会者普遍表达了积极的疫苗接种观点,特别是在安全性、有效性和可及性方面。然而,只有43%的人知道哪些疫苗是推荐给他们的。疫苗犹豫主要是由于不确定和缺乏关于推荐哪些疫苗的信息。参与者咨询了多个疫苗接种信息源(中位数3,四分位数范围2-7)。全科医生(89%)和风湿病学家(76%)是最常用的信息来源,最有可能产生积极的看法。对疫苗接种的负面看法最常来自互联网聊天室、社交媒体和主流媒体。年龄较小、男性以及对药物危害和过度使用的更多关注通常与较低的依从性和更大的不确定性有关,而教育和自我报告的识字率则与此无关。结论:炎症性关节炎的参与者普遍对疫苗接种持积极态度,尽管在建议他们接种哪种疫苗方面存在相当大的不确定性。这项研究强调需要改善消费者对炎症性关节炎患者的疫苗接种建议的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vaccination Rates, Perceptions, and Information Sources Used by People With Inflammatory Arthritis.

Objective: To determine vaccination rates, perceptions, and information sources in people with inflammatory arthritis.

Methods: Participants enrolled in the Australian Rheumatology Association Database were invited to participate in an online questionnaire, conducted in January 2020, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Included questions were about vaccination history, modified World Health Organization Vaccination Hesitancy Scale, views of the information sources consulted, the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire, education, and the Single-Item Health Literacy Screener.

Results: Response rate was 994 of 1498 (66%). The median age of participants was 62 years, with 67% female. Self-reported adherence was 83% for the influenza vaccine. Participants generally expressed positive vaccination views, particularly regarding safety, efficacy, and access. However, only 43% knew which vaccines were recommended for them. Vaccine hesitancy was primarily attributable to uncertainty and a perceived lack of information about which vaccines were recommended. Participants consulted multiple vaccination information sources (median 3, interquartile range 2-7). General practitioners (89%) and rheumatologists (76%) were the most frequently used information sources and were most likely to yield positive views. Negative views of vaccination were most often from internet chatrooms, social media, and mainstream media. Factors of younger age, male gender, and having more concerns about the harms and overuse of medicines in general were associated with lower adherence and greater uncertainty about vaccinations, whereas education and self-reported literacy were not.

Conclusion: Participants with inflammatory arthritis generally held positive views about vaccination, although there was considerable uncertainty as to which vaccinations were recommended for them. This study highlights the need for improved consumer information about vaccination recommendations for people with inflammatory arthritis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redox Pathogenesis in Rheumatic Diseases. Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis Associated With Alterations in the Gastrointestinal Microbiota. CD14+ Dendritic-Shaped Cells Functioning as Dendritic Cells in Rheumatoid Arthritis Synovial Tissues. Patient-Led Urate Self-Monitoring to Improve Clinical Outcomes in People With Gout: A Feasibility Study. Detection and Grading of Radiographic Hand Osteoarthritis Using an Automated Machine Learning Platform.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1