慢性冠脉综合征患者冠脉ct血管造影检测冠脉狭窄程度与ACEF风险评分的关系

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35
Mehmet Kis, Ferhat Siyamend Yurdam
{"title":"慢性冠脉综合征患者冠脉ct血管造影检测冠脉狭窄程度与ACEF风险评分的关系","authors":"Mehmet Kis,&nbsp;Ferhat Siyamend Yurdam","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>148 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, <i>P</i>=.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, <i>P</i>=.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), <i>P</i><.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/fe/0256-4947.2023.35.PMC9899341.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Kis,&nbsp;Ferhat Siyamend Yurdam\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.</p><p><strong>Sample size: </strong>148 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, <i>P</i>=.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, <i>P</i>=.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), <i>P</i><.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/97/fe/0256-4947.2023.35.PMC9899341.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.35","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:ACEF风险评分(年龄、肌酐和射血分数)不仅对短期和长期死亡率有令人满意的预测价值,而且对主要不良心血管事件也有令人满意的预测价值。目的:探讨ACEF危险评分与冠状动脉狭窄程度的关系。设计:回顾性观察性研究。地点:三级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心。主要观察指标:冠脉CTA中ACEF风险评分与冠脉狭窄程度的关系。样本量:148例。结果:在多变量回归分析中;左心室射血分数(OR: 0.94;95%CI: 0.89-0.99, P= 0.015)和ACEF风险评分(OR: 5.63;95% CI: 1.62 ~ 19.57, P= 0.007)是冠状动脉狭窄程度的独立预测因子。冠脉狭窄≥70%患者的ACEF风险评分(1.43[0.59])高于冠脉狭窄患者,P1.04是冠脉CTA检测CCS患者是否存在严重冠脉狭窄的预测指标,敏感性66%,特异性69%。结论:CCS患者的高ACEF风险评分(年龄、肌酐、射血分数)与冠状动脉CTA检测到的严重冠状动脉狭窄相关,可作为CCS患者冠状动脉造影的评估工具。局限性:由于我们没有长期随访结果,我们不知道ACEF风险评分在CCS患者长期随访中的预后价值。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between degree of coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and ACEF risk score in patients with chronic coronary syndrome.

Background: The ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, and ejection fraction) has been associated with satisfactory predictive values not only for short-term and long-term mortality but also for major adverse cardiovascular events.

Objectives: Investigate the relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis.

Design: Retrospective, observational study.

Setting: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.

Patients and methods: In patients with coronary coronary artery stenosis <70% were compared with patients with stenosis ≥70%. All were diagnosed with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and had undergone coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed for the cut-off value of the ACEF risk score. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed for significant parameters related to degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.

Main outcome measures: Relationship between ACEF risk score and degree of coronary artery stenosis in coronary CTA.

Sample size: 148 patients.

Results: In the multivariable regression analysis; left ventricular ejection fraction (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.89-0.99, P=.015) and ACEF risk score (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.62-19.57, P=.007) were independent predictors for degree of coronary artery stenosis. The ACEF risk score was statistically significantly higher in with patients with stenosis ≥70% (1.43 [0.59]) than in patients with stenosis <70% (0.98 [0.35]), P<.001). An ACEF risk score value >1.04 was a predictor of the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA in patients with CCS, with 66% sensitivity and 69% specificity.

Conclusions: A high ACEF risk score (age, creatinine, ejection fraction) in patients with CCS is associated with the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis detected by coronary CTA, and was useful as an assessment tool for coronary angiography in patients with CCS.

Limitations: Since we do not have long-term follow-up results, we do not know the prognostic value of the ACEF risk score in the long-term follow-up of patients with CCS.

Conflict of interest: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of secondary infections and association with mortality rates of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Management of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: eight cases over 13 years. Effect of atmospheric pressure changes on the development of pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis of 8 years of data. Placenta accreta spectrum in major placenta previa diagnosed only by MRI: incidence, risk factors, and maternal morbidity. Effect of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on the fetus in pregnant women who recovered from infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1