st段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局与住院时间的关系

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Saudi Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25
Mehmet Ozbek, Kamran Ildirimli, Baran Arik, Adem Aktan, Mehmet Sait Coskun, Ali Evsen, Tuncay Guzel, Halit Acet, Muhammed Demira
{"title":"st段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局与住院时间的关系","authors":"Mehmet Ozbek,&nbsp;Kamran Ildirimli,&nbsp;Baran Arik,&nbsp;Adem Aktan,&nbsp;Mehmet Sait Coskun,&nbsp;Ali Evsen,&nbsp;Tuncay Guzel,&nbsp;Halit Acet,&nbsp;Muhammed Demira","doi":"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (<i>P</i>=.012); 32.9% of the patients whose symptoms started at night presented with Killip class II-IV, while during the daytime, 21.4% presented with Killip class II-IV (<i>P</i>=.001). Among the patients, the most common was inferior STEMI (38.6%). However, no-reflow was significantly higher during the daytime compared to the nighttime (<i>P</i>=.12). The risk of the cardiac arrest on admission was 1.2 times higher in patients admitted at night (<i>P</i>=.034). Neither time interval of admission nor several other variables had an effect on clinical outcome or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>More \"real world\" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":8016,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/35/0256-4947.2023.25.PMC9899343.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dependence of clinical outcomes on time of hospital admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Ozbek,&nbsp;Kamran Ildirimli,&nbsp;Baran Arik,&nbsp;Adem Aktan,&nbsp;Mehmet Sait Coskun,&nbsp;Ali Evsen,&nbsp;Tuncay Guzel,&nbsp;Halit Acet,&nbsp;Muhammed Demira\",\"doi\":\"10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Investigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Clinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (<i>P</i>=.012); 32.9% of the patients whose symptoms started at night presented with Killip class II-IV, while during the daytime, 21.4% presented with Killip class II-IV (<i>P</i>=.001). Among the patients, the most common was inferior STEMI (38.6%). However, no-reflow was significantly higher during the daytime compared to the nighttime (<i>P</i>=.12). The risk of the cardiac arrest on admission was 1.2 times higher in patients admitted at night (<i>P</i>=.034). Neither time interval of admission nor several other variables had an effect on clinical outcome or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>More \\\"real world\\\" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI.</p><p><strong>Conflict of interest: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e6/35/0256-4947.2023.25.PMC9899343.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Saudi Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Saudi Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2023.25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)对st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在医院正常工作时间内或工作时间外预后影响的研究结果相互矛盾。虽然一些研究人员报告了在工作时间以外入院的STEMI患者的死亡率更高,但其他研究人员没有发现统计学上的显著差异。目的:按入院时间调查STEMI患者的短期终点和长期结局。设计:回顾性设置:三级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心。患者和方法:患者按入院时间分组,分为4个时间段:06:00 ~主要结局指标:临床资料和死亡率样本大小:735例;中位(IQR)年龄62(22)岁;215名(29.3%)女性。结果:夜间住院患者发生肺水肿的可能性是白天住院患者的1.37倍(P= 0.012);夜间出现症状的患者中有32.9%为Killip II-IV级,而白天出现症状的患者中有21.4%为Killip II-IV级(P= 0.001)。其中以下位STEMI最为常见(38.6%)。然而,无回流在白天明显高于夜间(P=.12)。夜间住院患者入院时发生心脏骤停的风险是夜间住院患者的1.2倍(P= 0.034)。入院时间间隔和其他几个变量对临床结果和死亡率都没有影响。结论:夜间入院的患者出现肺水肿和心源性休克的频率更高,但手术后白天未观察到血流。虽然夜间入院的STEMI患者临床状况较差,但两组临床结果相似。局限性:如果该研究复制了更典型的PCI转诊条件,则可能获得更多“真实世界”的结果。利益冲突:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dependence of clinical outcomes on time of hospital admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Background: There are conflicting results in studies investigating the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during or outside of usual hospital working hours. While some researchers have reported higher mortality rates in STEMI patients admitted outside of working hours, others did not find a statistically significant difference.

Objectives: Investigate the short-term endpoints and long-term outcomes of STEMI patients by time of admission.

Design: Retrospective SETTING: Tertiary percutaneous coronary intervention center.

Patients and methods: Patients were grouped by admission, which consisted of four intervals: 06:00 to <12:00, 12:00 to <18:00, 18:00 to <24:00, and 24:00 to <06:00. We analyzed demographic, clinical and mortality by admission time interval and mortality by multivariate analyses, including the time intervals.

Main outcome measures: Clinical data and mortality SAMPLE SIZE: 735 patients; median (IQR) age 62 (22) years; 215 (29.3%) women.

Results: Patients admitted at night were 1.37 times more likely to experience pulmonary edema than patients whose symptoms started in the daytime (P=.012); 32.9% of the patients whose symptoms started at night presented with Killip class II-IV, while during the daytime, 21.4% presented with Killip class II-IV (P=.001). Among the patients, the most common was inferior STEMI (38.6%). However, no-reflow was significantly higher during the daytime compared to the nighttime (P=.12). The risk of the cardiac arrest on admission was 1.2 times higher in patients admitted at night (P=.034). Neither time interval of admission nor several other variables had an effect on clinical outcome or mortality.

Conclusions: While patients admitted at night presented with pulmonary edema and cardiogenic shock more frequently, no reflow was observed during the day after the procedure. Although patients admitted at night with STEMI presented with worse clinical conditions, similar results were observed between the groups in clinical outcomes.

Limitations: More "real world" results might have been obtained if the study had replicated more typical referral conditions for PCI.

Conflict of interest: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Saudi Medicine
Annals of Saudi Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Saudi Medicine (ASM) is published bimonthly by King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We publish scientific reports of clinical interest in English. All submissions are subject to peer review by the editorial board and by reviewers in appropriate specialties. The journal will consider for publication manuscripts from any part of the world, but particularly reports that would be of interest to readers in the Middle East or other parts of Asia and Africa. Please go to the Author Resource Center for additional information.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of secondary infections and association with mortality rates of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Management of twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence: eight cases over 13 years. Effect of atmospheric pressure changes on the development of pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis of 8 years of data. Placenta accreta spectrum in major placenta previa diagnosed only by MRI: incidence, risk factors, and maternal morbidity. Effect of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on the fetus in pregnant women who recovered from infection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1