通过电话随访应用EQ-5D-3L的心理测量特性:波斯交通队列的经验。

Nasrin Shahedifar, Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Mostafa Farahbakhsh, Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi, Alireza Razzaghi, Mina Golestani, Faramarz Pourasghar
{"title":"通过电话随访应用EQ-5D-3L的心理测量特性:波斯交通队列的经验。","authors":"Nasrin Shahedifar,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani,&nbsp;Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi,&nbsp;Mostafa Farahbakhsh,&nbsp;Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi,&nbsp;Alireza Razzaghi,&nbsp;Mina Golestani,&nbsp;Faramarz Pourasghar","doi":"10.30476/BEAT.2022.95972.1375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess psychometric properties of the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) commonly used tool for measuring road traffic injury (RTI) patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The psychometric study assessed the reliability and applicability of EQ-5D-3L through phone surveys, based on a national cohort platform. Data of 150 RTI patients recruited from the cohort study were included as 50 patients per each follow-up phase (one, six, and twelve months after discharge). A 12- day-time span was between test and retest. We measured psychometric properties (internal consistency reliability and stability reliability) and agreement using Kappa coefficients and percentages of agreement and Bland-Altman method. Data were analysed using software STATA statistical package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were men (80%) with mean age (SD) of 41(14.7%), employed (78%) and educated (86%). The Persian version represented high internal consistency reliability at total level (Cronbach's α=0.81) and moderate to good reliability at phase levels (0.62-0.87). The stability reliability was excellent at total (ICC=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.98) and phase levels (0.97-0.98. The kappa agreement coefficients were valued moderate to perfect (0.6-0.8, <i>p</i>>0.0001). The Bland-altman plot illustrated high agreement between test and retest scores. No floor and ceiling effects were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that EQ-5D-3L was highly reliable and responsive to be applied through phone interviews at three different times post injury and discharge, as no previous study considered its psychometric properties at various phone follow-ups after RTIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"10 4","pages":"181-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/07/bet-10-181.PMC9758709.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of EQ-5D-3L Applied through Phone Follow-Ups: An Experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Nasrin Shahedifar,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani,&nbsp;Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi,&nbsp;Mostafa Farahbakhsh,&nbsp;Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi,&nbsp;Alireza Razzaghi,&nbsp;Mina Golestani,&nbsp;Faramarz Pourasghar\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/BEAT.2022.95972.1375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess psychometric properties of the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) commonly used tool for measuring road traffic injury (RTI) patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The psychometric study assessed the reliability and applicability of EQ-5D-3L through phone surveys, based on a national cohort platform. Data of 150 RTI patients recruited from the cohort study were included as 50 patients per each follow-up phase (one, six, and twelve months after discharge). A 12- day-time span was between test and retest. We measured psychometric properties (internal consistency reliability and stability reliability) and agreement using Kappa coefficients and percentages of agreement and Bland-Altman method. Data were analysed using software STATA statistical package.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of patients were men (80%) with mean age (SD) of 41(14.7%), employed (78%) and educated (86%). The Persian version represented high internal consistency reliability at total level (Cronbach's α=0.81) and moderate to good reliability at phase levels (0.62-0.87). The stability reliability was excellent at total (ICC=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.98) and phase levels (0.97-0.98. The kappa agreement coefficients were valued moderate to perfect (0.6-0.8, <i>p</i>>0.0001). The Bland-altman plot illustrated high agreement between test and retest scores. No floor and ceiling effects were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that EQ-5D-3L was highly reliable and responsive to be applied through phone interviews at three different times post injury and discharge, as no previous study considered its psychometric properties at various phone follow-ups after RTIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"181-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/07/bet-10-181.PMC9758709.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.95972.1375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/BEAT.2022.95972.1375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估欧洲生活质量5维3级版本(EQ-5D-3L)常用的道路交通伤害(RTI)患者生活质量测量工具的心理测量特性。方法:心理测量学研究基于全国队列平台,通过电话调查评估EQ-5D-3L的信度和适用性。从队列研究中招募的150例RTI患者的数据包括每个随访阶段(出院后1、6和12个月)50例患者。两次测试之间的时间间隔为12天。我们使用Kappa系数、一致性百分比和Bland-Altman方法测量心理测量特性(内部一致性信度和稳定性信度)和一致性。采用STATA统计软件包对数据进行分析。结果:大多数患者为男性(80%),平均年龄(SD) 41岁(14.7%),有工作(78%),受过教育(86%)。波斯版本在总水平上具有较高的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's α=0.81),在阶段水平上具有中等至良好的信度(0.62-0.87)。在总水平(ICC=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.98)和相水平(0.97-0.98)上稳定性可靠度极佳。kappa一致系数为中等至完美(0.6-0.8,p>0.0001)。Bland-altman图说明了测试分数和复试分数之间的高度一致性。没有发现地板和天花板效应。结论:EQ-5D-3L在伤后和出院后三个不同时间的电话访谈中具有较高的可靠性和反应性,因为之前的研究没有考虑过其在rti后各种电话随访中的心理测量特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of EQ-5D-3L Applied through Phone Follow-Ups: An Experience in PERSIAN Traffic Cohort.

Objective: To assess psychometric properties of the European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 3-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) commonly used tool for measuring road traffic injury (RTI) patients' quality of life.

Methods: The psychometric study assessed the reliability and applicability of EQ-5D-3L through phone surveys, based on a national cohort platform. Data of 150 RTI patients recruited from the cohort study were included as 50 patients per each follow-up phase (one, six, and twelve months after discharge). A 12- day-time span was between test and retest. We measured psychometric properties (internal consistency reliability and stability reliability) and agreement using Kappa coefficients and percentages of agreement and Bland-Altman method. Data were analysed using software STATA statistical package.

Results: The majority of patients were men (80%) with mean age (SD) of 41(14.7%), employed (78%) and educated (86%). The Persian version represented high internal consistency reliability at total level (Cronbach's α=0.81) and moderate to good reliability at phase levels (0.62-0.87). The stability reliability was excellent at total (ICC=0.98, 95% CI: 0.97, 0.98) and phase levels (0.97-0.98. The kappa agreement coefficients were valued moderate to perfect (0.6-0.8, p>0.0001). The Bland-altman plot illustrated high agreement between test and retest scores. No floor and ceiling effects were found.

Conclusion: The study revealed that EQ-5D-3L was highly reliable and responsive to be applied through phone interviews at three different times post injury and discharge, as no previous study considered its psychometric properties at various phone follow-ups after RTIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
期刊最新文献
An Epidemiological Investigation on Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from 2010 to 2020. A Novel Skin Incision for Posterior Fossa Midline and Paramedian Lesions: A Technical Note and Case Series. Surgical Treatment versus Conservative Management of Splenic Rupture: Outcomes and Risk Factors. Effect of Intranasal Remifentanil versus Lidocaine on Facilitation of Laryngeal Mask Airway Insertion and Cardiovascular Response: A Double-blind Clinical Trial Study. Ten-year Causes of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis in Patients Referred to Ghaem Hospital from 2009 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1