远程医疗:女性盆腔医学和整形外科的新 "虚拟现实"?

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001149
Haidy Morsy, Carter Scott, Ruple Jairath, Chiara Ghetti, Christine Chu, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jerry L Lowder
{"title":"远程医疗:女性盆腔医学和整形外科的新 \"虚拟现实\"?","authors":"Haidy Morsy, Carter Scott, Ruple Jairath, Chiara Ghetti, Christine Chu, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jerry L Lowder","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding women's acceptance of telemedicine as a model of care for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) allows for a more patient-centered approach to widespread implementation in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The pandemic sparked rapid and widespread implementation of telemedicine. Our goal was to assess acceptance, satisfaction, and desire for future use of telemedicine among women seeking care for PFDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a structured telephone survey of new patients who underwent video visits, and established patients who underwent video or telephone visits, when nonurgent, in-person visits were suspended. Our survey assessed the following domains: satisfaction, future use of telemedicine, level of comfort, perceived utility, and access and comfort with technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April and July 2020, we conducted telemedicine visits with 221 patients, 131 (63% of eligible patients) of whom agreed to participate in our survey (63 (74%) telephone and 68 (56%) video, including 35 established and 33 new patients). Overall, most participants (96.3%) described being \"very\" or \"somewhat satisfied\" with telemedicine in addressing their needs and \"comfortable\" sharing personal information with providers in a telemedicine visit (94.7%). However, video participants (both new and established) were more likely to view telemedicine as valuable (P = 0.02) than telephone participants. Furthermore, established video participants perceived greater quality care of care (P = 0.01) than telephone participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video telemedicine is a well-accepted adjunct model of care with the potential to expand the reach of quality subspecialty care of value to women with PFDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"28 3","pages":"e80-e87"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919843/pdf/nihms-1765770.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Telemedicine: The New \\\"Virtual Reality\\\" of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery?\",\"authors\":\"Haidy Morsy, Carter Scott, Ruple Jairath, Chiara Ghetti, Christine Chu, Siobhan Sutcliffe, Jerry L Lowder\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding women's acceptance of telemedicine as a model of care for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) allows for a more patient-centered approach to widespread implementation in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The pandemic sparked rapid and widespread implementation of telemedicine. Our goal was to assess acceptance, satisfaction, and desire for future use of telemedicine among women seeking care for PFDs.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a structured telephone survey of new patients who underwent video visits, and established patients who underwent video or telephone visits, when nonurgent, in-person visits were suspended. Our survey assessed the following domains: satisfaction, future use of telemedicine, level of comfort, perceived utility, and access and comfort with technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April and July 2020, we conducted telemedicine visits with 221 patients, 131 (63% of eligible patients) of whom agreed to participate in our survey (63 (74%) telephone and 68 (56%) video, including 35 established and 33 new patients). Overall, most participants (96.3%) described being \\\"very\\\" or \\\"somewhat satisfied\\\" with telemedicine in addressing their needs and \\\"comfortable\\\" sharing personal information with providers in a telemedicine visit (94.7%). However, video participants (both new and established) were more likely to view telemedicine as valuable (P = 0.02) than telephone participants. Furthermore, established video participants perceived greater quality care of care (P = 0.01) than telephone participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Video telemedicine is a well-accepted adjunct model of care with the potential to expand the reach of quality subspecialty care of value to women with PFDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"e80-e87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8919843/pdf/nihms-1765770.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001149\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:了解妇女对远程医疗作为盆底疾病(PFDs)治疗模式的接受程度,有助于在女性盆腔内科和整形外科广泛实施以患者为中心的方法:大流行引发了远程医疗的快速和广泛实施。我们的目标是评估寻求 PFD 治疗的女性对远程医疗的接受度、满意度和未来使用的愿望:研究设计:我们对接受视频就诊的新患者和接受视频或电话就诊的老患者进行了结构化电话调查,当时非急诊的亲自就诊被暂停。我们的调查对以下方面进行了评估:满意度、远程医疗的未来使用情况、舒适度、感知效用以及技术的可及性和舒适度:2020 年 4 月至 7 月期间,我们对 221 名患者进行了远程医疗访问,其中 131 人(占符合条件患者的 63%)同意参与我们的调查(63 人(74%)通过电话,68 人(56%)通过视频,包括 35 名老患者和 33 名新患者)。总体而言,大多数参与者(96.3%)对远程医疗满足他们的需求表示 "非常满意 "或 "比较满意",对在远程医疗就诊中与医疗服务提供者分享个人信息表示 "舒适"(94.7%)。不过,与电话参与者相比,视频参与者(包括新参与者和已建立联系者)更倾向于认为远程医疗有价值(P = 0.02)。此外,与电话参与者相比,视频参与者认为护理质量更高(P = 0.01):视频远程医疗是一种广受认可的辅助医疗模式,有可能扩大优质亚专科医疗的覆盖范围,为患有 PFD 的妇女提供有价值的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Telemedicine: The New "Virtual Reality" of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery?

Importance: Understanding women's acceptance of telemedicine as a model of care for pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) allows for a more patient-centered approach to widespread implementation in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Objectives: The pandemic sparked rapid and widespread implementation of telemedicine. Our goal was to assess acceptance, satisfaction, and desire for future use of telemedicine among women seeking care for PFDs.

Study design: We performed a structured telephone survey of new patients who underwent video visits, and established patients who underwent video or telephone visits, when nonurgent, in-person visits were suspended. Our survey assessed the following domains: satisfaction, future use of telemedicine, level of comfort, perceived utility, and access and comfort with technology.

Results: Between April and July 2020, we conducted telemedicine visits with 221 patients, 131 (63% of eligible patients) of whom agreed to participate in our survey (63 (74%) telephone and 68 (56%) video, including 35 established and 33 new patients). Overall, most participants (96.3%) described being "very" or "somewhat satisfied" with telemedicine in addressing their needs and "comfortable" sharing personal information with providers in a telemedicine visit (94.7%). However, video participants (both new and established) were more likely to view telemedicine as valuable (P = 0.02) than telephone participants. Furthermore, established video participants perceived greater quality care of care (P = 0.01) than telephone participants.

Conclusions: Video telemedicine is a well-accepted adjunct model of care with the potential to expand the reach of quality subspecialty care of value to women with PFDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care. Factors Associated With a Positive Urine Culture in Women Seeking Urogynecologic Care for Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms. Complications Reported to the Food and Drug Administration: A Cross-sectional Comparison of Urogynecologic Meshes. The Role of Pessaries in the Treatment of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Impact of Methenamine Hippurate Treatment on Urothelial Integrity and Bladder Inflammation in Aged Female Mice and Women With Urinary Tract Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1