医疗专业人员层级中的亲社会声音:有害患者安全事件后情绪的作用。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Organization and Management Pub Date : 2023-02-28 DOI:10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0027
John G Richmond, Nicola Burgess
{"title":"医疗专业人员层级中的亲社会声音:有害患者安全事件后情绪的作用。","authors":"John G Richmond,&nbsp;Nicola Burgess","doi":"10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Supporting and nurturing effective communication between healthcare professionals is vital to protect patients from harm. However, not all forms of employee voice are effective. Fear can lead to defensive voice, while the role of other emotions to drive voice behaviour is less well understood. This paper aims to understand what role the broader range of emotions, including compassion and shame, experienced by healthcare professionals following patient safety incidents (PSI) play in the subsequent enactment of prosocial voice, a positive and other-oriented form of communication.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This study is based on data from a single English NHS hospital: interviews with healthcare professionals involved in PSIs (<i>N</i> = 40), observations at quality and risk committees and meetings (<i>N</i> = 26 h) and review of investigative documents (<i>N</i> = 33). Three recent PSIs were selected for cross-case analysis based upon organisational theory related to professional hierarchy, employee voice and literature on emotions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among three cases, the authors found variance in context, emotional experience and voice behaviour. Where professionals feared blame and repercussion, voice was defensive. Meanwhile where they experienced shame and compassion, prosocial voice was enacted to protect patients.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Healthcare organisations seeking to foster prosocial voice should: (1) be more considerate of professionals' emotional experiences post-PSI and ensure adequate support for recovery (2) establish norms for professionals to share their struggles with others (3) reward professionals who demonstrate caring behaviour (4) buffer professionals from workplace pressures.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The authors' study highlights how emotional experiences, such as shame and compassion, can mediate blame and defensiveness and lead to the enactment of prosocial voice in the professional hierarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":47447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prosocial voice in the hierarchy of healthcare professionals: the role of emotions after harmful patient safety incidents.\",\"authors\":\"John G Richmond,&nbsp;Nicola Burgess\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Supporting and nurturing effective communication between healthcare professionals is vital to protect patients from harm. However, not all forms of employee voice are effective. Fear can lead to defensive voice, while the role of other emotions to drive voice behaviour is less well understood. This paper aims to understand what role the broader range of emotions, including compassion and shame, experienced by healthcare professionals following patient safety incidents (PSI) play in the subsequent enactment of prosocial voice, a positive and other-oriented form of communication.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This study is based on data from a single English NHS hospital: interviews with healthcare professionals involved in PSIs (<i>N</i> = 40), observations at quality and risk committees and meetings (<i>N</i> = 26 h) and review of investigative documents (<i>N</i> = 33). Three recent PSIs were selected for cross-case analysis based upon organisational theory related to professional hierarchy, employee voice and literature on emotions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among three cases, the authors found variance in context, emotional experience and voice behaviour. Where professionals feared blame and repercussion, voice was defensive. Meanwhile where they experienced shame and compassion, prosocial voice was enacted to protect patients.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>Healthcare organisations seeking to foster prosocial voice should: (1) be more considerate of professionals' emotional experiences post-PSI and ensure adequate support for recovery (2) establish norms for professionals to share their struggles with others (3) reward professionals who demonstrate caring behaviour (4) buffer professionals from workplace pressures.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>The authors' study highlights how emotional experiences, such as shame and compassion, can mediate blame and defensiveness and lead to the enactment of prosocial voice in the professional hierarchy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Organization and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-01-2022-0027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:支持和培养医疗保健专业人员之间的有效沟通对于保护患者免受伤害至关重要。然而,并不是所有形式的员工发声都有效。恐惧会导致防御性的声音,而其他情绪在驱动声音行为中的作用还不太清楚。本文旨在了解医疗保健专业人员在患者安全事件(PSI)后所经历的更广泛的情感,包括同情和羞耻,在随后制定亲社会声音(一种积极的和面向他人的沟通形式)中发挥的作用。设计/方法/方法:本研究基于一家英国NHS医院的数据:对参与psi的医疗保健专业人员的访谈(N = 40),在质量和风险委员会和会议上的观察(N = 26小时)和调查文件的审查(N = 33)。基于与专业等级相关的组织理论、员工声音和情感文献,选择了最近的三个psi进行跨案例分析。研究发现:在三个案例中,作者发现了语境、情感体验和建言行为的差异。当专业人士害怕指责和反响时,他们的声音是防御性的。与此同时,当他们经历羞耻和同情时,亲社会的声音被发出来保护病人。实际意义:寻求促进亲社会声音的医疗机构应该:(1)更多地考虑专业人员在psi后的情绪体验,并确保为康复提供足够的支持;(2)建立专业人员与他人分享他们的斗争的规范;(3)奖励表现出关怀行为的专业人员;(4)缓冲专业人员的工作压力。原创性/价值:作者的研究强调了情感体验,如羞耻和同情,如何调解责备和防御,并导致职业等级中亲社会声音的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prosocial voice in the hierarchy of healthcare professionals: the role of emotions after harmful patient safety incidents.

Purpose: Supporting and nurturing effective communication between healthcare professionals is vital to protect patients from harm. However, not all forms of employee voice are effective. Fear can lead to defensive voice, while the role of other emotions to drive voice behaviour is less well understood. This paper aims to understand what role the broader range of emotions, including compassion and shame, experienced by healthcare professionals following patient safety incidents (PSI) play in the subsequent enactment of prosocial voice, a positive and other-oriented form of communication.

Design/methodology/approach: This study is based on data from a single English NHS hospital: interviews with healthcare professionals involved in PSIs (N = 40), observations at quality and risk committees and meetings (N = 26 h) and review of investigative documents (N = 33). Three recent PSIs were selected for cross-case analysis based upon organisational theory related to professional hierarchy, employee voice and literature on emotions.

Findings: Among three cases, the authors found variance in context, emotional experience and voice behaviour. Where professionals feared blame and repercussion, voice was defensive. Meanwhile where they experienced shame and compassion, prosocial voice was enacted to protect patients.

Practical implications: Healthcare organisations seeking to foster prosocial voice should: (1) be more considerate of professionals' emotional experiences post-PSI and ensure adequate support for recovery (2) establish norms for professionals to share their struggles with others (3) reward professionals who demonstrate caring behaviour (4) buffer professionals from workplace pressures.

Originality/value: The authors' study highlights how emotional experiences, such as shame and compassion, can mediate blame and defensiveness and lead to the enactment of prosocial voice in the professional hierarchy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: ■International health and international organizations ■Organisational behaviour, governance, management and leadership ■The inter-relationship of health and public sector services ■Theories and practices of management and leadership in health and related organizations ■Emotion in health care organizations ■Management education and training ■Industrial relations and human resource theory and management. As the demands on the health care industry both polarize and intensify, effective management of financial and human resources, the restructuring of organizations and the handling of market forces are increasingly important areas for the industry to address.
期刊最新文献
"This has reinvigorated me": perceived impacts of an innovation training program on employee experience and innovation support. Included and engaged: the significance of perceived inclusion among healthcare workers. Socioeconomic and demographic factors predictive of same day access utilization in outpatient radiation oncology. Why do aged care employees leave? Two explanations compared. Institutional work aimed at increasing employment orientation in mental health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1