红外热成像与糖尿病足预防和护理的标准护理相比:利用真实世界数据和专家小组的成本分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S396137
Olli Kurkela, Jorma Lahtela, Martti Arffman, Leena Forma
{"title":"红外热成像与糖尿病足预防和护理的标准护理相比:利用真实世界数据和专家小组的成本分析。","authors":"Olli Kurkela,&nbsp;Jorma Lahtela,&nbsp;Martti Arffman,&nbsp;Leena Forma","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S396137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive technology for screening and early detection of diabetic foot. Real-world data and the Delphi technique were used to assess IRT's potential effect on typical care pathways of diabetic foot and their costs in the Finnish healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most typical care pathways of diabetic foot were identified from national healthcare registers from 2011 to 2017. The effect of IRT in terms of avoidable care episodes was assessed by a Delphi panel including Finnish diabetic foot specialists (n=13). By combining a series of decision-analytic models, the IRT's potential effect on the costs of each pathway and their sensitivity to model assumptions were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypothetical annual savings were estimated to be EUR ~1.7 million (EUR ~1.3 million-EUR ~2.5 million), constituting approximately 20% of the total annual care pathway costs examined. In the longer and more complex pathways, the application of IRT was estimated to result in notable savings while in the shorter pathways, IRT could increase costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modeling suggests that IRT could potentially reduce costs in a Finnish healthcare setting. Given our analysis, generation of robust evidence on the effectiveness of recent IRT technologies with up-to-date protocols seems appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/8b/ceor-15-111.PMC9968423.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infrared Thermography Compared to Standard Care in the Prevention and Care of Diabetic Foot: A Cost Analysis Utilizing Real-World Data and an Expert Panel.\",\"authors\":\"Olli Kurkela,&nbsp;Jorma Lahtela,&nbsp;Martti Arffman,&nbsp;Leena Forma\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S396137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive technology for screening and early detection of diabetic foot. Real-world data and the Delphi technique were used to assess IRT's potential effect on typical care pathways of diabetic foot and their costs in the Finnish healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The most typical care pathways of diabetic foot were identified from national healthcare registers from 2011 to 2017. The effect of IRT in terms of avoidable care episodes was assessed by a Delphi panel including Finnish diabetic foot specialists (n=13). By combining a series of decision-analytic models, the IRT's potential effect on the costs of each pathway and their sensitivity to model assumptions were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hypothetical annual savings were estimated to be EUR ~1.7 million (EUR ~1.3 million-EUR ~2.5 million), constituting approximately 20% of the total annual care pathway costs examined. In the longer and more complex pathways, the application of IRT was estimated to result in notable savings while in the shorter pathways, IRT could increase costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modeling suggests that IRT could potentially reduce costs in a Finnish healthcare setting. Given our analysis, generation of robust evidence on the effectiveness of recent IRT technologies with up-to-date protocols seems appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/8b/ceor-15-111.PMC9968423.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S396137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S396137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:红外热像仪(IRT)是一种无创筛查和早期发现糖尿病足的技术。使用真实世界数据和德尔菲技术来评估IRT对糖尿病足典型护理途径的潜在影响及其在芬兰医疗保健环境中的成本。方法:从2011 - 2017年全国医疗卫生登记资料中找出糖尿病足最典型的护理途径。包括芬兰糖尿病足专家(n=13)在内的德尔菲小组评估了IRT在可避免护理事件方面的效果。通过结合一系列决策分析模型,估计了IRT对各路径成本的潜在影响及其对模型假设的敏感性。结果:假设每年节省的费用估计为170万欧元(130万- 250万欧元),约占所检查的年度护理途径总费用的20%。在较长和较复杂的路径中,IRT的应用估计会导致显着的节省,而在较短的路径中,IRT可能会增加成本。结论:我们的模型表明,IRT可以潜在地降低芬兰医疗保健环境的成本。鉴于我们的分析,对最新IRT技术和最新协议的有效性产生强有力的证据似乎是合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infrared Thermography Compared to Standard Care in the Prevention and Care of Diabetic Foot: A Cost Analysis Utilizing Real-World Data and an Expert Panel.

Aim: Infrared thermography (IRT) is a non-invasive technology for screening and early detection of diabetic foot. Real-world data and the Delphi technique were used to assess IRT's potential effect on typical care pathways of diabetic foot and their costs in the Finnish healthcare setting.

Methods: The most typical care pathways of diabetic foot were identified from national healthcare registers from 2011 to 2017. The effect of IRT in terms of avoidable care episodes was assessed by a Delphi panel including Finnish diabetic foot specialists (n=13). By combining a series of decision-analytic models, the IRT's potential effect on the costs of each pathway and their sensitivity to model assumptions were estimated.

Results: Hypothetical annual savings were estimated to be EUR ~1.7 million (EUR ~1.3 million-EUR ~2.5 million), constituting approximately 20% of the total annual care pathway costs examined. In the longer and more complex pathways, the application of IRT was estimated to result in notable savings while in the shorter pathways, IRT could increase costs.

Conclusion: Our modeling suggests that IRT could potentially reduce costs in a Finnish healthcare setting. Given our analysis, generation of robust evidence on the effectiveness of recent IRT technologies with up-to-date protocols seems appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of the Cesarean Section Clinical Pathway Model: Not Examining Cesarean Section Comprehensively [Response to Letter]. Evaluating Service Satisfaction and Sustainability of the Afya Insurance Scheme in Kuwait: An Exploratory Analysis. Health Equity Considerations in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Insights from an Umbrella Review. Real-World Adherence and Discontinuation of Oral Antipsychotics and Associated Factors in a National Sample of US Medicare Beneficiaries with Schizophrenia. Healthcare Resource Use and Costs Among Individuals with Vitiligo and Psychosocial Comorbidities: Retrospective Analysis of an Insured US Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1