利用人工神经网络推荐腰椎内镜手术通道。

IF 1.4 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_281_21
Chien-Min Chen, Pei-Chen Chen, Ying-Chieh Chen, Guan-Chyuan Wang
{"title":"利用人工神经网络推荐腰椎内镜手术通道。","authors":"Chien-Min Chen,&nbsp;Pei-Chen Chen,&nbsp;Ying-Chieh Chen,&nbsp;Guan-Chyuan Wang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_281_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The transforaminal and interlaminar approaches are the two main surgical corridors of full endoscopic lumbar surgery. However, there are no quantifying methods for assessing the best surgical approach for each patient. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) model using an artificial neural network (ANN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent full endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery were enrolled in this research. Fourteen pre-operative factors were fed into the ANN. A three-layer deep neural network was constructed. Patient data were divided into the training, validation, and testing datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 899 patients enrolled. The accuracy of the training, validation, and test datasets were 87.3%, 85.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. The positive predictive values for the transforaminal and interlaminar approaches were 85.1% and 89.1%, respectively. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.91. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was utilized to explain the relative importance of each factor. The surgical lumbar level was the most important factor, followed by herniated disc localization and migrating disc zone level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANN can effectively learn from the choice of an experienced spinal endoscopic surgeon and can accurately predict the appropriate surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"34 4","pages":"434-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/cc/TCMJ-34-434.PMC9791850.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use artificial neural network to recommend the lumbar spinal endoscopic surgical corridor.\",\"authors\":\"Chien-Min Chen,&nbsp;Pei-Chen Chen,&nbsp;Ying-Chieh Chen,&nbsp;Guan-Chyuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_281_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The transforaminal and interlaminar approaches are the two main surgical corridors of full endoscopic lumbar surgery. However, there are no quantifying methods for assessing the best surgical approach for each patient. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) model using an artificial neural network (ANN).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent full endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery were enrolled in this research. Fourteen pre-operative factors were fed into the ANN. A three-layer deep neural network was constructed. Patient data were divided into the training, validation, and testing datasets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 899 patients enrolled. The accuracy of the training, validation, and test datasets were 87.3%, 85.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. The positive predictive values for the transforaminal and interlaminar approaches were 85.1% and 89.1%, respectively. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.91. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was utilized to explain the relative importance of each factor. The surgical lumbar level was the most important factor, followed by herniated disc localization and migrating disc zone level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ANN can effectively learn from the choice of an experienced spinal endoscopic surgeon and can accurately predict the appropriate surgical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"434-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/cc/TCMJ-34-434.PMC9791850.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tzu Chi Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_281_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_281_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经椎间孔入路和椎间入路是全内窥镜腰椎手术的两个主要手术通道。然而,没有量化的方法来评估每个患者的最佳手术入路。本研究旨在利用人工神经网络(ANN)建立人工智能(AI)模型。材料和方法:接受全内窥镜腰椎手术的患者被纳入本研究。将14个术前因素输入人工神经网络。构造了一个三层深度神经网络。患者数据被分为训练、验证和测试数据集。结果:共纳入899例患者。训练、验证和测试数据集的准确率分别为87.3%、85.5%和85.0%。经椎间孔入路和椎间入路的阳性预测值分别为85.1%和89.1%。受试者工作特性曲线下面积为0.91。使用SHapley加性解释算法来解释每个因素的相对重要性。手术腰椎水平是最重要的因素,其次是椎间盘突出定位和椎间盘迁移区水平。结论:人工神经网络能有效学习经验丰富的脊柱内镜外科医生的选择,并能准确预测合适的手术入路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use artificial neural network to recommend the lumbar spinal endoscopic surgical corridor.

Objectives: The transforaminal and interlaminar approaches are the two main surgical corridors of full endoscopic lumbar surgery. However, there are no quantifying methods for assessing the best surgical approach for each patient. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence (AI) model using an artificial neural network (ANN).

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent full endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery were enrolled in this research. Fourteen pre-operative factors were fed into the ANN. A three-layer deep neural network was constructed. Patient data were divided into the training, validation, and testing datasets.

Results: There were 899 patients enrolled. The accuracy of the training, validation, and test datasets were 87.3%, 85.5%, and 85.0%, respectively. The positive predictive values for the transforaminal and interlaminar approaches were 85.1% and 89.1%, respectively. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.91. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was utilized to explain the relative importance of each factor. The surgical lumbar level was the most important factor, followed by herniated disc localization and migrating disc zone level.

Conclusion: ANN can effectively learn from the choice of an experienced spinal endoscopic surgeon and can accurately predict the appropriate surgical approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Epigenetic modification in radiotherapy and immunotherapy for cancers. Natural phytochemicals as small-molecule proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. The obesity paradox exists in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of body mass index effects on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in Asia. Unraveling the interplay between inflammation and stem cell mobilization or homing: Implications for tissue repair and therapeutics. C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12-C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 signaling axis in cancer and the development of chemotherapeutic molecules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1