深度学习在冠状动脉解剖成像中的应用:系统综述与荟萃分析。

Ebraham Alskaf, Utkarsh Dutta, Cian M Scannell, Amedeo Chiribiri
{"title":"深度学习在冠状动脉解剖成像中的应用:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Ebraham Alskaf, Utkarsh Dutta, Cian M Scannell, Amedeo Chiribiri","doi":"10.21037/jmai-22-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of deep learning on medical imaging is growing in prevalence in the recent literature. One of the most studied areas is coronary artery disease (CAD). Imaging of coronary artery anatomy is fundamental, which has led to a high number of publications describing a variety of techniques. The aim of this systematic review is to review the evidence behind the accuracy of deep learning applications in coronary anatomy imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search for the relevant studies, which applied deep learning on coronary anatomy imaging, was performed in a systematic approach on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, followed by reviewing of abstracts and full texts. The data from the final studies was retrieved using data extraction forms. A meta-analysis was performed on a subgroup of studies, which looked at fractional flow reserve (FFR) prediction. Heterogeneity was tested using tau<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Q tests. Finally, a risk of bias was performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common imaging modality was coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (58%) and the most common deep learning method was convolutional neural network (CNN) (52%). The majority of studies demonstrated good performance metrics. The most common outputs were focused on coronary artery segmentation, clinical outcome prediction, coronary calcium quantification and FFR prediction, and most studies reported area under the curve (AUC) of ≥80%. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) derived from 8 studies looking at FFR prediction using CCTA was 12.5 using the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method. There was no significant heterogeneity amongst studies according to Q test (P=0.2496).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning has been used in many applications on coronary anatomy imaging, most of which are yet to be externally validated and prepared for clinical use. The performance of deep learning, especially CNN models, proved to be powerful and some applications have already translated into medical practice, such as computed tomography (CT)-FFR. These applications have the potential to translate technology into better care of CAD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical artificial intelligence","volume":"5 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/84/EMS163415.PMC7614252.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning applications in coronary anatomy imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ebraham Alskaf, Utkarsh Dutta, Cian M Scannell, Amedeo Chiribiri\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jmai-22-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of deep learning on medical imaging is growing in prevalence in the recent literature. One of the most studied areas is coronary artery disease (CAD). Imaging of coronary artery anatomy is fundamental, which has led to a high number of publications describing a variety of techniques. The aim of this systematic review is to review the evidence behind the accuracy of deep learning applications in coronary anatomy imaging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search for the relevant studies, which applied deep learning on coronary anatomy imaging, was performed in a systematic approach on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, followed by reviewing of abstracts and full texts. The data from the final studies was retrieved using data extraction forms. A meta-analysis was performed on a subgroup of studies, which looked at fractional flow reserve (FFR) prediction. Heterogeneity was tested using tau<sup>2</sup>, I<sup>2</sup> and Q tests. Finally, a risk of bias was performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common imaging modality was coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (58%) and the most common deep learning method was convolutional neural network (CNN) (52%). The majority of studies demonstrated good performance metrics. The most common outputs were focused on coronary artery segmentation, clinical outcome prediction, coronary calcium quantification and FFR prediction, and most studies reported area under the curve (AUC) of ≥80%. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) derived from 8 studies looking at FFR prediction using CCTA was 12.5 using the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method. There was no significant heterogeneity amongst studies according to Q test (P=0.2496).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deep learning has been used in many applications on coronary anatomy imaging, most of which are yet to be externally validated and prepared for clinical use. The performance of deep learning, especially CNN models, proved to be powerful and some applications have already translated into medical practice, such as computed tomography (CT)-FFR. These applications have the potential to translate technology into better care of CAD patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical artificial intelligence\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b7/84/EMS163415.PMC7614252.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical artificial intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jmai-22-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jmai-22-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在最近的文献中,深度学习在医学成像中的应用越来越普遍。研究最多的领域之一是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。冠状动脉解剖成像是基础,这导致了大量描述各种技术的出版物。本系统综述旨在回顾深度学习应用于冠状动脉解剖成像的准确性背后的证据:方法:在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 数据库中以系统方法搜索冠状动脉解剖成像中应用深度学习的相关研究,然后审阅摘要和全文。使用数据提取表对最终研究的数据进行了检索。对研究的一个分组进行了荟萃分析,该分组研究了分数血流储备(FFR)预测。使用 tau2、I2 和 Q 检验对异质性进行了检验。最后,使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS)方法进行了偏倚风险分析:共有 81 项研究符合纳入标准。最常见的成像模式是冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)(58%),最常见的深度学习方法是卷积神经网络(CNN)(52%)。大多数研究显示了良好的性能指标。最常见的输出结果集中在冠状动脉分割、临床结果预测、冠状动脉钙化定量和 FFR 预测上,大多数研究报告的曲线下面积(AUC)≥80%。使用曼特尔-海恩泽尔(MH)法,从 8 项使用 CCTA 预测 FFR 的研究中得出的诊断几率比(DOR)为 12.5。根据Q检验(P=0.2496),各研究之间不存在明显的异质性:深度学习已被用于冠状动脉解剖成像的许多应用中,但其中大多数尚未经过外部验证并准备用于临床。深度学习的性能,尤其是 CNN 模型,被证明是强大的,一些应用已经转化为医疗实践,如计算机断层扫描(CT)-FFR。这些应用有可能将技术转化为对 CAD 患者的更好护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning applications in coronary anatomy imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The application of deep learning on medical imaging is growing in prevalence in the recent literature. One of the most studied areas is coronary artery disease (CAD). Imaging of coronary artery anatomy is fundamental, which has led to a high number of publications describing a variety of techniques. The aim of this systematic review is to review the evidence behind the accuracy of deep learning applications in coronary anatomy imaging.

Methods: The search for the relevant studies, which applied deep learning on coronary anatomy imaging, was performed in a systematic approach on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, followed by reviewing of abstracts and full texts. The data from the final studies was retrieved using data extraction forms. A meta-analysis was performed on a subgroup of studies, which looked at fractional flow reserve (FFR) prediction. Heterogeneity was tested using tau2, I2 and Q tests. Finally, a risk of bias was performed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) approach.

Results: A total of 81 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common imaging modality was coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (58%) and the most common deep learning method was convolutional neural network (CNN) (52%). The majority of studies demonstrated good performance metrics. The most common outputs were focused on coronary artery segmentation, clinical outcome prediction, coronary calcium quantification and FFR prediction, and most studies reported area under the curve (AUC) of ≥80%. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) derived from 8 studies looking at FFR prediction using CCTA was 12.5 using the Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method. There was no significant heterogeneity amongst studies according to Q test (P=0.2496).

Conclusions: Deep learning has been used in many applications on coronary anatomy imaging, most of which are yet to be externally validated and prepared for clinical use. The performance of deep learning, especially CNN models, proved to be powerful and some applications have already translated into medical practice, such as computed tomography (CT)-FFR. These applications have the potential to translate technology into better care of CAD patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative American Heart Association plot of late gadolinium enhancement with mortality and ventricular arrhythmia prediction using artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence in periodontology and implantology—a narrative review Exploring the capabilities and limitations of large language models in nuclear medicine knowledge with primary focus on GPT-3.5, GPT-4 and Google Bard Hybrid artificial intelligence outcome prediction using features extraction from stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance images and electronic health records Analysis of factors influencing maternal mortality and newborn health—a machine learning approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1