COVID-19的扩展健康信念模型:理解基于媒体的导致社交距离和恐慌性购买的过程。

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8
Marie Louise Radanielina Hita, Yany Grégoire, Bruno Lussier, Simon Boissonneault, Christian Vandenberghe, Sylvain Sénécal
{"title":"COVID-19的扩展健康信念模型:理解基于媒体的导致社交距离和恐慌性购买的过程。","authors":"Marie Louise Radanielina Hita,&nbsp;Yany Grégoire,&nbsp;Bruno Lussier,&nbsp;Simon Boissonneault,&nbsp;Christian Vandenberghe,&nbsp;Sylvain Sénécal","doi":"10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Building on the health belief model (HBM), this research tests, over six months, how the exposure to COVID-related information in the media affects fear, which in turn conditions beliefs about the severity of the virus, susceptibility of getting the virus, and benefits of safety measures. These health beliefs ultimately lead to social distancing and panic buying. As a first contribution, we find that fear is not directly triggered by the objective severity of a crisis, but rather formed over time by the way individuals are exposed to media. Second, we show that fear affects behaviors through the components of the HBM which relate to the risks/benefits of a situation. Last, we find that critical thinking about media content amplifies the \"adaptive\" responses of our model (e.g., health beliefs, social distancing) and reduces its \"maladaptive\" responses (e.g., panic buying). Interestingly, we note that the beneficial effect of critical thinking about media content disappears as the level of fear increases over time. The implications of these findings for policymakers, media companies, and theory are further discussed.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"51 1","pages":"132-152"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109429/pdf/","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An extended health belief model for COVID-19: understanding the media-based processes leading to social distancing and panic buying.\",\"authors\":\"Marie Louise Radanielina Hita,&nbsp;Yany Grégoire,&nbsp;Bruno Lussier,&nbsp;Simon Boissonneault,&nbsp;Christian Vandenberghe,&nbsp;Sylvain Sénécal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Building on the health belief model (HBM), this research tests, over six months, how the exposure to COVID-related information in the media affects fear, which in turn conditions beliefs about the severity of the virus, susceptibility of getting the virus, and benefits of safety measures. These health beliefs ultimately lead to social distancing and panic buying. As a first contribution, we find that fear is not directly triggered by the objective severity of a crisis, but rather formed over time by the way individuals are exposed to media. Second, we show that fear affects behaviors through the components of the HBM which relate to the risks/benefits of a situation. Last, we find that critical thinking about media content amplifies the \\\"adaptive\\\" responses of our model (e.g., health beliefs, social distancing) and reduces its \\\"maladaptive\\\" responses (e.g., panic buying). Interestingly, we note that the beneficial effect of critical thinking about media content disappears as the level of fear increases over time. The implications of these findings for policymakers, media companies, and theory are further discussed.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"132-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9109429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本研究以健康信念模型(HBM)为基础,在六个多月的时间里测试了在媒体上接触与covid - 19相关的信息如何影响恐惧,这反过来又影响了对病毒严重程度、感染病毒的易感性以及安全措施益处的信念。这些健康信念最终会导致社交距离和恐慌性购买。作为第一个贡献,我们发现恐惧不是由危机的客观严重性直接引发的,而是由个人接触媒体的方式随着时间的推移而形成的。其次,我们表明恐惧通过与情境的风险/收益相关的HBM成分影响行为。最后,我们发现对媒体内容的批判性思考放大了我们模型的“适应性”反应(例如,健康信念,社会距离)并减少了其“不适应”反应(例如,恐慌性购买)。有趣的是,我们注意到,随着时间的推移,对媒体内容进行批判性思考的有益影响会随着恐惧程度的增加而消失。进一步讨论了这些发现对政策制定者、媒体公司和理论的影响。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An extended health belief model for COVID-19: understanding the media-based processes leading to social distancing and panic buying.

Building on the health belief model (HBM), this research tests, over six months, how the exposure to COVID-related information in the media affects fear, which in turn conditions beliefs about the severity of the virus, susceptibility of getting the virus, and benefits of safety measures. These health beliefs ultimately lead to social distancing and panic buying. As a first contribution, we find that fear is not directly triggered by the objective severity of a crisis, but rather formed over time by the way individuals are exposed to media. Second, we show that fear affects behaviors through the components of the HBM which relate to the risks/benefits of a situation. Last, we find that critical thinking about media content amplifies the "adaptive" responses of our model (e.g., health beliefs, social distancing) and reduces its "maladaptive" responses (e.g., panic buying). Interestingly, we note that the beneficial effect of critical thinking about media content disappears as the level of fear increases over time. The implications of these findings for policymakers, media companies, and theory are further discussed.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00865-8.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses Purpose orientation: An emerging theory transforming business for a better world Shifting focus in the fight against core environmental challenges Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1