ADHD患者中断的等待行为:探索奖励可得性和预测线索的影响。

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Child Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518
Emi Furukawa, Brent Alsop, Heloisa Alves, Valerie Vorderstrasse, Kelly D Carrasco, Chi-Ching Chuang, Gail Tripp
{"title":"ADHD患者中断的等待行为:探索奖励可得性和预测线索的影响。","authors":"Emi Furukawa,&nbsp;Brent Alsop,&nbsp;Heloisa Alves,&nbsp;Valerie Vorderstrasse,&nbsp;Kelly D Carrasco,&nbsp;Chi-Ching Chuang,&nbsp;Gail Tripp","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Altered motivational processing is purported to contribute to ADHD symptoms. A stronger preference for immediate over delayed reward is well documented in ADHD. However, little attention has been paid to children's capacity to withhold responding until a \"better\" reward becomes available, and their actions while waiting. Using a novel computer task, we examine the ability of children with and without ADHD to wait to collect a large reward in the presence of a small available reward. The effects of a reward-predicting cue on response times and response choices are also explored. Data from 136 children (6-12 years), 90 with ADHD and 46 typically developing (TD) children, are included. The children could collect a small immediately available reward or wait to access a larger reward after a variable delay, its imminent availability sometimes signaled by a cue. Subsequent probe trials explored the effects of longer waiting times and disruption of the cue-reward association. As expected, children with ADHD collected the small immediately available reward more often than TD children. Importantly, they were more likely to terminate waiting once commenced, collecting the small reward or attempting to collect the large reward early. The cue decreased their response time but disrupted their waiting when it no longer consistently predicted reward. Children with ADHD were more likely to abandon efforts to wait, especially when wait times were extended and when expected rewards failed to appear. Behavioral interventions for ADHD should take into account reduced waiting capacity that extends beyond children's preference for immediate reward.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":"29 1","pages":"76-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disrupted waiting behavior in ADHD: exploring the impact of reward availability and predictive cues.\",\"authors\":\"Emi Furukawa,&nbsp;Brent Alsop,&nbsp;Heloisa Alves,&nbsp;Valerie Vorderstrasse,&nbsp;Kelly D Carrasco,&nbsp;Chi-Ching Chuang,&nbsp;Gail Tripp\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Altered motivational processing is purported to contribute to ADHD symptoms. A stronger preference for immediate over delayed reward is well documented in ADHD. However, little attention has been paid to children's capacity to withhold responding until a \\\"better\\\" reward becomes available, and their actions while waiting. Using a novel computer task, we examine the ability of children with and without ADHD to wait to collect a large reward in the presence of a small available reward. The effects of a reward-predicting cue on response times and response choices are also explored. Data from 136 children (6-12 years), 90 with ADHD and 46 typically developing (TD) children, are included. The children could collect a small immediately available reward or wait to access a larger reward after a variable delay, its imminent availability sometimes signaled by a cue. Subsequent probe trials explored the effects of longer waiting times and disruption of the cue-reward association. As expected, children with ADHD collected the small immediately available reward more often than TD children. Importantly, they were more likely to terminate waiting once commenced, collecting the small reward or attempting to collect the large reward early. The cue decreased their response time but disrupted their waiting when it no longer consistently predicted reward. Children with ADHD were more likely to abandon efforts to wait, especially when wait times were extended and when expected rewards failed to appear. Behavioral interventions for ADHD should take into account reduced waiting capacity that extends beyond children's preference for immediate reward.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"76-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2068518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机处理过程的改变被认为会导致ADHD症状。ADHD患者对即时奖励的偏好比延迟奖励更强。然而,很少有人注意到儿童在获得“更好”奖励之前不做出反应的能力,以及他们在等待时的行为。使用一种新颖的计算机任务,我们检查了患有和没有多动症的儿童在小奖励存在的情况下等待收集大奖励的能力。研究还探讨了奖励预测线索对反应时间和反应选择的影响。数据来自136名儿童(6-12岁),90名ADHD儿童和46名典型发育(TD)儿童。孩子们可以立即获得一个小的奖励,也可以在一段可变的延迟后等待获得一个更大的奖励,这个奖励的即将获得有时会通过提示来表示。随后的探针试验探索了更长等待时间和线索-奖励关联中断的影响。正如预期的那样,患有多动症的儿童比患有多动症的儿童更经常地收集即时可用的小奖励。重要的是,一旦开始等待,他们更有可能终止等待,收集小奖励或试图提前收集大奖励。提示减少了他们的反应时间,但当提示不再持续预测奖励时,会打断他们的等待。患有多动症的儿童更有可能放弃等待的努力,尤其是当等待时间延长,预期的奖励没有出现时。ADHD的行为干预应该考虑到等待能力的减少,这超出了儿童对即时奖励的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Disrupted waiting behavior in ADHD: exploring the impact of reward availability and predictive cues.

Altered motivational processing is purported to contribute to ADHD symptoms. A stronger preference for immediate over delayed reward is well documented in ADHD. However, little attention has been paid to children's capacity to withhold responding until a "better" reward becomes available, and their actions while waiting. Using a novel computer task, we examine the ability of children with and without ADHD to wait to collect a large reward in the presence of a small available reward. The effects of a reward-predicting cue on response times and response choices are also explored. Data from 136 children (6-12 years), 90 with ADHD and 46 typically developing (TD) children, are included. The children could collect a small immediately available reward or wait to access a larger reward after a variable delay, its imminent availability sometimes signaled by a cue. Subsequent probe trials explored the effects of longer waiting times and disruption of the cue-reward association. As expected, children with ADHD collected the small immediately available reward more often than TD children. Importantly, they were more likely to terminate waiting once commenced, collecting the small reward or attempting to collect the large reward early. The cue decreased their response time but disrupted their waiting when it no longer consistently predicted reward. Children with ADHD were more likely to abandon efforts to wait, especially when wait times were extended and when expected rewards failed to appear. Behavioral interventions for ADHD should take into account reduced waiting capacity that extends beyond children's preference for immediate reward.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive performance, psychiatric comorbidities, and quality of life in pediatric patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative analysis with healthy controls. Development of inattention and executive dysfunction in youth with spina bifida: condition severity variables as predictors. Evidence of validity of the Head-Toes-Knees-Shoulders Revised (HTKS-R) for Brazilian children. Early life parechovirus infection neuropsychological outcomes at 8 years: a cohort study. Validation of the autism behavior checklist in Egyptian children with autism spectrum disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1